• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

农村痴呆症护理中正在进行的研究项目的利益相关者参与策略:利益相关者和研究人员的观点。

A stakeholder engagement strategy for an ongoing research program in rural dementia care: Stakeholder and researcher perspectives.

机构信息

Canadian Centre for Health & Safety in Agriculture, Department of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274769. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0274769
PMID:36137130
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9499231/
Abstract

Participatory research approaches have developed in response to the growing emphasis on translation of research evidence into practice. However, there are few published examples of stakeholder engagement strategies, and little guidance specific to larger ongoing research programs or those with a rural focus. This paper describes the evolution, structure, and processes of an annual Rural Dementia Summit launched in 2008 as an engagement strategy for the Rural Dementia Action Research (RaDAR) program and ongoing for more than 10 years; and reports findings from a parallel mixed-methods study that includes stakeholder and researcher perspectives on the Summit's value and impact. Twelve years of stakeholder evaluations were analyzed. Rating scale data were summarized with descriptive statistics; open-ended questions were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. A thematic analysis was also used to analyze interviews with RaDAR researchers. Rating scale data showed high stakeholder satisfaction with all aspects of the Summit. Five themes were identified in the qualitative data: hearing diverse perspectives, building connections, collaborating for change, developing research and practice capacity, and leaving recharged. Five themes were identified in the researcher data: impact on development as a researcher, understanding stakeholder needs, informing research design, deepening commitment to rural dementia research, and building a culture of engagement. These findings reflect the key principles and impacts of stakeholder engagement reported in the literature. Additional findings include the value stakeholders place on connecting with stakeholders from diverse backgrounds, how the Summit was revitalizing, and how it developed stakeholder capacity to support change in their communities. Findings indicate that the Summit has developed into a community of practice where people with a common interest come together to learn and collaborate to improve rural dementia care. The Summit's success and sustainability are linked to RaDAR's responsiveness to stakeholder needs, the trust that has been established, and the value that stakeholders and researchers find in their participation.

摘要

参与式研究方法是为了响应将研究证据转化为实践的日益重视而发展起来的。然而,很少有关于利益相关者参与策略的发表案例,也几乎没有针对大型正在进行的研究计划或以农村为重点的研究计划的具体指导。本文描述了 2008 年发起的年度农村痴呆症峰会作为农村痴呆症行动研究(RaDAR)计划的参与策略的演变、结构和过程,以及对峰会价值和影响的利益相关者和研究人员的平行混合方法研究的结果。对 12 年来的利益相关者评估进行了分析。评分量表数据采用描述性统计进行总结;对开放式问题采用归纳主题分析进行分析。对 RaDAR 研究人员的访谈也采用了主题分析。评分量表数据显示,利益相关者对峰会的各个方面都非常满意。定性数据中确定了五个主题:听取不同观点、建立联系、合作变革、发展研究和实践能力、充满活力。研究人员的数据中确定了五个主题:对作为研究人员的发展的影响、了解利益相关者的需求、为研究设计提供信息、加深对农村痴呆症研究的承诺以及建立参与文化。这些发现反映了文献中报告的利益相关者参与的关键原则和影响。其他发现包括利益相关者对与来自不同背景的利益相关者建立联系的重视程度、峰会的复兴方式以及峰会如何发展利益相关者的能力以支持其社区的变革。研究结果表明,峰会已经发展成为一个实践社区,有共同兴趣的人聚集在一起学习和合作,以改善农村痴呆症护理。峰会的成功和可持续性与 RaDAR 对利益相关者需求的响应能力、建立的信任以及利益相关者和研究人员在参与中发现的价值有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ef/9499231/0b50377eb185/pone.0274769.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ef/9499231/c2bbb9890f32/pone.0274769.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ef/9499231/0b50377eb185/pone.0274769.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ef/9499231/c2bbb9890f32/pone.0274769.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/72ef/9499231/0b50377eb185/pone.0274769.g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A stakeholder engagement strategy for an ongoing research program in rural dementia care: Stakeholder and researcher perspectives.农村痴呆症护理中正在进行的研究项目的利益相关者参与策略:利益相关者和研究人员的观点。
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 22;17(9):e0274769. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274769. eCollection 2022.
2
Engagement with a diverse Stakeholder Advisory Council for research in dementia care.与一个多元化的利益相关者咨询委员会合作开展痴呆症护理研究。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 23;7(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00297-8.
3
A lung cancer research agenda that reflects the diverse perspectives of community stakeholders: process and outcomes of the SEED method.一项反映社区利益相关者不同观点的肺癌研究议程:SEED方法的过程与成果
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y. eCollection 2019.
4
Using Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) research techniques for inter-stakeholder dialogue in primary healthcare: an analysis of stakeholders' experiences.运用参与式学习与行动(PLA)研究技术开展基层医疗保健中的利益相关者间对话:利益相关者经验分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Dec 6;3:28. doi: 10.1186/s40900-017-0077-8. eCollection 2017.
5
Rules of engagement: perspectives on stakeholder engagement for genomic biobanking research in South Africa.参与规则:南非基因组生物样本库研究中利益相关者参与的视角
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0252-y.
6
Evolution of a community-based participatory approach in a rural and remote dementia care research program.农村及偏远地区痴呆症护理研究项目中基于社区参与式方法的演变
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2014 Autumn;8(3):337-45. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2014.0040.
7
The ethical challenges and opportunities of implementing engagement strategies in health research.实施健康研究参与策略的伦理挑战与机遇。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:37-43. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.009. Epub 2021 Apr 21.
8
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
9
Lessons learned from CMS's National Partnership to Improve Dementia Care: a thematic synthesis of multiple stakeholder-engaged studies.从 CMS 的国家改善痴呆症护理伙伴关系中吸取的经验教训:多利益相关者参与研究的主题综合分析。
Psychogeriatrics. 2024 Sep;24(5):1045-1050. doi: 10.1111/psyg.13157. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
10
Rural and remote dementia care challenges and needs: perspectives of formal and informal care providers residing in Saskatchewan, Canada.农村和偏远地区痴呆症护理的挑战与需求:加拿大萨斯喀彻温省正规和非正规护理提供者的观点
Rural Remote Health. 2014;14(3):2747. Epub 2014 Aug 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Adaptation of a digital health intervention for rural adults: application of the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Enhanced.针对农村成年人的数字健康干预措施的调整:《报告调整与修改-增强版框架》的应用
Front Digit Health. 2025 Feb 18;7:1493814. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1493814. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
A five-step approach for developing and implementing a Rural Primary Health Care Model for Dementia: a community-academic partnership.一种用于开发和实施农村痴呆症初级卫生保健模式的五步方法:社区-学术伙伴关系。
Prim Health Care Res Dev. 2019 May 15;20:e29. doi: 10.1017/S1463423618000968.
2
A review of reviews on principles, strategies, outcomes and impacts of research partnerships approaches: a first step in synthesising the research partnership literature.对研究伙伴关系方法的原则、策略、结果和影响的综述:综合研究伙伴关系文献的第一步。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 May 25;18(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0544-9.
3
Lessons learned from developing and sustaining a community-research collaborative through translational research.
从通过转化研究建立和维持社区-研究合作中获得的经验教训。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug 8;2(2):79-85. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.7. eCollection 2018 Apr.
4
Barriers and facilitators to development and implementation of a rural primary health care intervention for dementia: a process evaluation.农村初级卫生保健干预措施制定和实施的障碍和促进因素:过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Oct 17;19(1):709. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4548-5.
5
Engaging Individuals with Neurological Conditions and Caregivers in Rural Communities in a Health Research Team.让农村社区患有神经系统疾病的患者及护理人员参与健康研究团队。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(2):129-139. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2019.0027.
6
Patient stakeholder engagement in research: A narrative review to describe foundational principles and best practice activities.患者利益相关者参与研究:描述基础原则和最佳实践活动的叙述性综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):307-316. doi: 10.1111/hex.12873. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
7
How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.如何让利益相关者参与研究:支持改进的设计原则。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6.
8
Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge.基于社区的参与式研究和综合知识转化:推进知识的共同创造。
Implement Sci. 2017 Dec 19;12(1):150. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3.
9
Mixed methods research: expanding the evidence base.混合方法研究:扩大证据基础。
Evid Based Nurs. 2017 Jul;20(3):74-75. doi: 10.1136/eb-2017-102699. Epub 2017 Jun 14.
10
Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.参与研究的方法和影响,从理论到实践再到理论:患者为中心的结果研究所的早期发现。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):17-31. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1581-x. Epub 2017 May 12.