Rafie Carlin L, Zimmerman Emily B, Moser Dawn E, Cook Sarah, Zarghami Fatemeh
1Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 321 Wallace Hall (0430), 295 West Campus Drive, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061 USA.
2Center on Society and Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main St., Suite 5032, P.O. Box 980212, Richmond, Virginia 23298-0159 USA.
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Jan 11;5:3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0134-y. eCollection 2019.
There is a need for methods that engage lay people and other stakeholders, such as patients and healthcare providers, in developing research questions about health issues important to them and their communities. Involving stakeholders helps ensure that funding goes to research that addresses their concerns. The SEED Method engages stakeholders in a systematic process to explore health issues and develop research questions. Diverse groups of stakeholders participate at three levels: as collaborators that lead the process throughout, as participants who use their expertise to develop the questions, and as consultants who provide additional perspectives about the health topic. We used the SEED Method to engage 61 stakeholders from different socioeconomic and professional backgrounds to create research questions on lung cancer outcomes. Participants included cancer patients and caregivers, healthcare providers and administrators, and policymakers from a rural Virginia community. They developed causal models that diagrammed factors that influence lung cancer outcomes and the relationships between them. They used these models to develop priority research questions. The questions reflect the participants' diverse perspectives and address different areas of inquiry related to lung cancer outcomes, including access to care, support systems, social determinants of health, and quality of care. Participants felt well prepared to perform the project tasks because they had the opportunity to review lung cancer information, receive causal model and research question development training, and participate in facilitated group activities. The SEED Method can be used in a variety of settings and applied to any health topic of interest to stakeholders.
Engagement of stakeholders in prioritization of health research can help ensure that funding is directed to research that reflects their concerns and needs. The Stakeholder Engagement in quEstion Development and Prioritization (SEED) Method is a multi-stakeholder methodology that uses principles of community engagement and causal modeling to develop health research questions that reflect the priorities of patients, clinicians, and other community stakeholders. We conducted a demonstration of the SEED Method to generate research questions on lung cancer outcomes, and to evaluate the process, outcomes, and effectiveness of the method for generating a research agenda that reflects diverse stakeholder perspectives. The SEED Method engages community members at three levels: collaboration, participation, and consultation. We conducted a demonstration project from November, 2015 to July, 2016, in a rural Virginia community that was experiencing a significant disparity in lung cancer outcomes. A community research team led the project and selected three distinct stakeholder groups (Topic groups, TG) for participatory engagement in analysis of the health issue, causal modeling, and research question development. We evaluated the quality of stakeholder engagement and compared TG causal models and research questions to evaluate the diversity of stakeholder perspectives resulting from the methodology. The resulting research agenda poses questions on how a broad range of topics including access to care, support systems and coping mechanisms, social determinants of health, and quality of care impacts lung cancer outcomes. Participants felt well prepared for the tasks they were asked to perform due to the technical trainings and facilitated modeling and question development activities that are part of the SEED Method. The causal models and research questions developed by the Topic Groups reflected the diverse perspectives of the stakeholders. The SEED Method has the potential to generate relevant stakeholder-centered research agendas on a variety of health-related topics, and to create community capacity for sustained research engagement.
需要有方法让非专业人士以及患者和医疗服务提供者等其他利益相关者参与进来,共同提出对他们及其社区而言重要的健康问题的研究问题。让利益相关者参与有助于确保资金投入到能解决他们所关注问题的研究中。SEED方法让利益相关者参与一个系统的过程,以探索健康问题并提出研究问题。不同群体的利益相关者在三个层面参与:作为贯穿整个过程的领导者的合作者、运用专业知识提出问题的参与者以及就健康主题提供额外观点的顾问。我们运用SEED方法让来自不同社会经济和专业背景的61名利益相关者参与,以提出关于肺癌结局的研究问题。参与者包括癌症患者及其护理者、医疗服务提供者和管理人员,以及弗吉尼亚州一个农村社区的政策制定者。他们构建了因果模型,描绘了影响肺癌结局的因素及其相互关系。他们利用这些模型提出优先研究问题。这些问题反映了参与者的不同观点,并涉及与肺癌结局相关的不同研究领域,包括医疗服务可及性、支持系统、健康的社会决定因素以及医疗质量。参与者感觉为执行项目任务做好了充分准备,因为他们有机会查阅肺癌信息、接受因果模型和研究问题开发培训,并参与有引导的小组活动。SEED方法可用于各种环境,并应用于利益相关者感兴趣的任何健康主题。
让利益相关者参与健康研究的优先排序有助于确保资金投向反映他们关切和需求的研究。利益相关者参与问题开发和优先排序(SEED)方法是一种多利益相关者方法,它运用社区参与原则和因果建模来提出反映患者、临床医生和其他社区利益相关者优先事项的健康研究问题。我们进行了SEED方法的示范,以生成关于肺癌结局的研究问题,并评估该方法在生成反映不同利益相关者观点的研究议程方面的过程、结果和有效性。SEED方法让社区成员在三个层面参与:合作、参与和咨询。我们于2015年11月至2016年7月在弗吉尼亚州一个农村社区开展了一个示范项目,该社区在肺癌结局方面存在显著差异。一个社区研究团队领导该项目,并挑选了三个不同的利益相关者群体(主题组,TG)参与对健康问题的分析、因果建模和研究问题开发。我们评估了利益相关者参与的质量,并比较了TG的因果模型和研究问题,以评估该方法所产生的利益相关者观点的多样性。由此产生的研究议程提出了关于广泛主题的问题,包括医疗服务可及性、支持系统和应对机制、健康的社会决定因素以及医疗质量如何影响肺癌结局。由于作为SEED方法一部分的技术培训以及有引导的建模和问题开发活动,参与者对要求他们执行的任务感觉准备充分。主题组开发的因果模型和研究问题反映了利益相关者的不同观点。SEED方法有潜力就各种与健康相关的主题生成以利益相关者为中心的相关研究议程,并建立社区持续参与研究的能力。