Suppr超能文献

基于人群样本的比利时 LDCDQ(LDCDQ-BE)的心理测量特性。

Psychometric properties of the Belgian LDCDQ (LDCDQ-BE) in a population based sample.

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Health Care Sciences, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Entrance 46, UZ Ghent, C. Heymanslaan 10, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2022 Nov;130:104340. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104340. Epub 2022 Sep 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder usually diagnosed at school-age. It is related to secondary consequences urging early identification. The Little Developmental Coordination Questionnaire (LDCDQ) is a tool to identify young children at risk of a later DCD diagnosis.

AIMS

To explore psychometric properties and cut-off scores for the Belgian version the LDCDQ (LDCDQ-BE).

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

Questionnaires were completed by parents (n = 637) and teachers (n = 249) of children aged 3-5 years in regular schools. Additionally, motor development of 82 children was assessed with the M-ABC-2, Beery-VMI-6 and teacher's Motor Skill Checklist (MSC).

OUTCOMES AND RESULTS

The LDCDQ-BE demonstrates excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.92), moderate convergent validity with M-ABC-2 (r = 0.42), and weak to moderate concurrent validity to Beery-VMI-6 (r = 0.30-0.31) and teacher's rating on MSC (r = 0.27). Discriminant validity with M-ABC-2 and Beery-VMI-6 subtest Visual-Motor Integration is poor, but moderate with Beery-VMI-6 subtest Motor Coordination (p = 0.023) and MSC (p = 0.021). A fair agreement was established between parent's and teacher's rating (=0.308; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Sensitivity of the LDCDQ-BE is low to moderate. It should be interpreted cautiously as predictive validity in children with DCD has yet to be established.

摘要

背景

发育性协调障碍(DCD)是一种神经发育障碍,通常在学龄期被诊断出来。它与促使早期识别的次要后果有关。Little 发育协调问卷(LDCDQ)是一种用于识别有日后 DCD 诊断风险的幼儿的工具。

目的

探索比利时版 LDCDQ(LDCDQ-BE)的心理测量特性和截断分数。

方法和程序

在正规学校中,由父母(n=637)和教师(n=249)完成问卷,同时对 82 名 3-5 岁儿童的运动发育进行评估,使用 M-ABC-2、Beery-VMI-6 和教师运动技能检查表(MSC)。

结果和结论

LDCDQ-BE 具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's α=0.92),与 M-ABC-2 有中等的聚合效度(r=0.42),与 Beery-VMI-6(r=0.30-0.31)和教师对 MSC 的评价(r=0.27)有弱到中等的同时效度。与 M-ABC-2 和 Beery-VMI-6 视觉运动整合分测验的区分效度较差,但与 Beery-VMI-6 运动协调分测验(p=0.023)和 MSC(p=0.021)有中等的区分效度。父母和教师的评价之间存在良好的一致性(=0.308;p<0.001)。LDCDQ-BE 的敏感性为中等到低等。由于在 DCD 儿童中的预测效度尚未确定,因此应谨慎解释。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验