• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用离散选择实验开发决策辅助工具以告知药房中持续性疼痛的管理:一项随机可行性研究方案。

Using a discrete choice experiment to develop a decision aid tool to inform the management of persistent pain in pharmacy: a protocol for a randomised feasibility study.

机构信息

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK

Health Economics Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e066379. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066379.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066379
PMID:36137622
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9511577/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

In an era of personalised healthcare, it has become increasingly important to elicit individual-level preferences. While discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are widely used to measure patient preferences in the delivery of healthcare, the focus has been sample-level analysis. Using the DCE methodology, this project has designed a digital decision aid tool (DAT) with the potential to estimate individual preferences in real time to inform clinical consultation decisions in persistent pain management.

METHODS

Using a feasibility randomised control trial, this study aims to assess the feasibility of using this Understanding Persistent Pain (UPP) DAT in a pharmacy-based clinical setting and to test processes for a future definite randomised trial. Community and practice-based pharmacists (up to 10) will be recruited in The National Health Service (NHS) Grampian and trained in the use of the digital UPP DAT. Pharmacists will recruit up to 60 patients who are living with persistent pain. Patients will be randomised to one of two groups: using the UPP DAT or usual care. Pharmacists will follow-up patients as needed according to clinical need and following standard practice. DCE response data collected by the UPP DAT will be analysed using the penalised logit model, allowing estimation of individual preferences in real time. We will follow-up pharmacists and patients who use the UPP DAT to gather feedback on their experiences.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study received ethical approval from the North of Scotland Research Ethics Committee (21/NS/0059) and received Research & Development Management Permission to proceed from NHS Grampian (2021UA003E). The study has been registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications, presentations and newsletters and made available in the University of Aberdeen and Pharmacy Research UK websites. Participants gave informed consent to participate in the study before taking part.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05102578; clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

简介

在个性化医疗保健时代,越来越重要的是要引出个人层面的偏好。虽然离散选择实验(DCE)被广泛用于衡量医疗保健提供中的患者偏好,但重点一直是样本层面的分析。本项目使用 DCE 方法学设计了一种数字决策辅助工具(DAT),具有实时估计个体偏好的潜力,以告知持续性疼痛管理中的临床咨询决策。

方法

本研究采用可行性随机对照试验,旨在评估在基于社区的药剂师临床环境中使用这种理解持续性疼痛(UPP)DAT 的可行性,并测试未来确定性随机试验的流程。将在英国国民健康服务(NHS)格兰扁招募多达 10 名社区和实践型药剂师,并对他们进行数字 UPP DAT 使用方面的培训。药剂师将招募多达 60 名患有持续性疼痛的患者。患者将随机分为两组:使用 UPP DAT 或常规护理。药剂师将根据临床需要和标准实践,根据需要对患者进行随访。UPP DAT 收集的 DCE 响应数据将使用惩罚对数模型进行分析,允许实时估计个体偏好。我们将随访使用 UPP DAT 的药剂师和患者,以收集他们的反馈。

伦理和传播

本研究获得了北苏格兰研究伦理委员会(21/NS/0059)的伦理批准,并获得了 NHS Grampian 的研究与开发管理许可(2021UA003E)。该研究已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 数据库中注册。研究结果将发表在同行评议的出版物、演讲和通讯中,并在阿伯丁大学和英国药房研究网站上提供。参与者在参与研究之前已给予知情同意。

试验注册号

NCT05102578;clinicaltrials.gov。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5222/9511577/bca874593f24/bmjopen-2022-066379f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5222/9511577/82c0be9b5e1b/bmjopen-2022-066379f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5222/9511577/bca874593f24/bmjopen-2022-066379f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5222/9511577/82c0be9b5e1b/bmjopen-2022-066379f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5222/9511577/bca874593f24/bmjopen-2022-066379f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Using a discrete choice experiment to develop a decision aid tool to inform the management of persistent pain in pharmacy: a protocol for a randomised feasibility study.使用离散选择实验开发决策辅助工具以告知药房中持续性疼痛的管理:一项随机可行性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Sep 22;12(9):e066379. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066379.
2
A digital health-supported and community pharmacy-based lifestyle intervention program for adults with pre-diabetes: a study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial.一项基于数字健康和社区药房的生活方式干预计划,用于治疗成年人前驱糖尿病:一项基于群组的随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 23;14(10):e083921. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-083921.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
5
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of a personalised guided consultation versus usual physiotherapy care in people presenting with shoulder pain: a protocol for the PANDA-S cluster randomised controlled trial and process evaluation.个性化指导咨询与常规物理治疗对肩痛患者的临床疗效和成本效益:PANDA-S 集群随机对照试验及过程评估方案
BMJ Open. 2025 May 6;15(5):e100501. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100501.
6
Pharmacist-led DE-eSCALation of opioids post-surgical dischargE (DESCALE) - A multi-centre, non-randomised, feasibility study protocol.药剂师主导的术后出院时阿片类药物降阶梯治疗(DESCALE)——一项多中心、非随机可行性研究方案
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Apr 10;4:48. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13716.2. eCollection 2024.
7
Informal caregiver training for people with chronic pain in musculoskeletal services (JOINT SUPPORT): protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial.肌肉骨骼服务中慢性疼痛患者的非正式照护者培训(JOINT SUPPORT):一项可行性随机对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jan 27;13(1):e070865. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-070865.
8
Tailored digital behaviour change intervention with e-referral system to increase attendance at NHS stop smoking services (the MyWay project): study protocol for a randomised controlled feasibility trial.基于电子转介系统的定制化数字行为改变干预措施以提高国民保健服务戒烟服务就诊率(MyWay 项目):一项随机对照可行性试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e028721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028721.
9
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
Embedding a Choice Experiment in an Online Decision Aid or Tool: Scoping Review.将选择实验嵌入在线决策辅助工具或手段:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 21;27:e59209. doi: 10.2196/59209.
2
Practical applications of methods to incorporate patient preferences into medical decision models: a scoping review.将患者偏好纳入医学决策模型的方法的实际应用:一项范围综述
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2025 Mar 3;25(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12911-025-02945-5.
3
Trade-offs between overall survival and side effects in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer: eliciting preferences of patients with primary and metastatic breast cancer using a discrete choice experiment.

本文引用的文献

1
Expanding Video Consultation Services at Pace and Scale in Scotland During the COVID-19 Pandemic: National Mixed Methods Case Study.在 COVID-19 大流行期间,苏格兰以速度和规模扩大视频咨询服务:全国混合方法案例研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Oct 7;23(10):e31374. doi: 10.2196/31374.
2
Shared decision-making: summary of NICE guidance.共同决策:英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所指南摘要
BMJ. 2021 Jun 17;373:n1430. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1430.
3
Video consultations in ordinary and extraordinary times.平常时期与特殊时期的视频会诊
转移性乳腺癌治疗中总生存与副作用的权衡:使用离散选择实验得出原发性和转移性乳腺癌患者的偏好。
BMJ Open. 2024 Apr 28;14(4):e076798. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076798.
Pract Neurol. 2020 Oct;20(5):396-403. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2020-002579. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
4
Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment in a Decision Aid to Nudge Patients Towards Value-Concordant Treatment Choices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Concept Study.在类风湿性关节炎决策辅助工具中运用离散选择实验推动患者做出符合价值观的治疗选择:一项概念验证研究
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 May 18;14:829-838. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S221897. eCollection 2020.
5
A guide to the reporting of protocols of pilot and feasibility trials.试点试验和可行性试验方案报告指南。
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019 Feb 28;5:37. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0423-8. eCollection 2019.
6
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.健康经济学中的离散选择实验:过去、现在和未来。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2019 Feb;37(2):201-226. doi: 10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2.
7
The future of pain pharmacy: driven by need.疼痛药学的未来:由需求驱动。
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2016 Apr 18;5:33-42. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S63824. eCollection 2016.
8
The value of different aspects of person-centred care: a series of discrete choice experiments in people with long-term conditions.以患者为中心的护理不同方面的价值:针对慢性病患者的一系列离散选择实验
BMJ Open. 2017 Apr 26;7(4):e015689. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015689.
9
Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.为面临医疗治疗或筛查决策的人们提供的决策辅助工具。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 12;4(4):CD001431. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub5.
10
Using discrete choice experiments as a decision aid in total knee arthroplasty: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.将离散选择实验用作全膝关节置换术的决策辅助工具:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Aug 19;17(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1536-5.