Suppr超能文献

在类风湿性关节炎决策辅助工具中运用离散选择实验推动患者做出符合价值观的治疗选择:一项概念验证研究

Using a Discrete-Choice Experiment in a Decision Aid to Nudge Patients Towards Value-Concordant Treatment Choices in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

作者信息

Hazlewood Glen S, Marshall Deborah A, Barber Claire E H, Li Linda C, Barnabe Cheryl, Bykerk Vivian, Tugwell Peter, Hull Pauline M, Bansback Nick

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

McCaig Institute of Bone and Joint Health, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.

出版信息

Patient Prefer Adherence. 2020 May 18;14:829-838. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S221897. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate, in a proof-of-concept study, a decision aid that incorporates hypothetical choices in the form of a discrete-choice experiment (DCE), to help patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) understand their values and nudge them towards a value-centric decision between methotrexate and triple therapy (a combination of methotrexate, sulphasalazine and hydroxychloroquine).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the decision aid, patients completed a series of 6 DCE choice tasks. Based on the patient's pattern of responses, we calculated his/her probability of choosing each treatment, using data from a prior DCE. Following pilot testing, we conducted a cross-sectional study to determine the agreement between the predicted and final stated preference, as a measure of value concordance. Secondary outcomes including time to completion and usability were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Pilot testing was completed with 10 patients and adjustments were made. We then recruited 29 patients to complete the survey: median age 57, 55% female. The patients were all taking treatment and had well-controlled disease. The predicted treatment agreed with the final treatment chosen by the patient 21/29 times (72%), similar to the expected agreement from the mean of the predicted probabilities (68%). Triple therapy was the predicted treatment 24/29 times (83%) and chosen 20/29 (69%) times. Half of the patients (51%) agreed that completing the choice questions helped them to understand their preferences (38% neutral, 10% disagreed). The tool took an average of 15 minutes to complete, and median usability scores were 55 (system usability scale) indicating "OK" usability.

CONCLUSION

Using a DCE as a value-clarification task within a decision aid is feasible, with promising potential to help nudge patients towards a value-centric decision. Usability testing suggests further modifications are needed prior to implementation, perhaps by having the DCE exercises as an "add-on" to a simpler decision aid.

摘要

目的

在一项概念验证研究中,评估一种决策辅助工具,该工具以离散选择实验(DCE)的形式纳入假设选择,以帮助早期类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者了解自身价值观,并促使他们在甲氨蝶呤和三联疗法(甲氨蝶呤、柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹的组合)之间做出以价值观为中心的决策。

患者与方法

在决策辅助工具中,患者完成了一系列6个DCE选择任务。根据患者的回答模式,我们使用先前DCE的数据计算其选择每种治疗方法的概率。经过预试验后,我们进行了一项横断面研究,以确定预测偏好与最终陈述偏好之间的一致性,作为价值一致性的衡量标准。还评估了包括完成时间和可用性在内的次要结果。

结果

对10名患者完成了预试验并进行了调整。然后我们招募了29名患者完成调查:中位年龄57岁,55%为女性。这些患者均在接受治疗且疾病得到良好控制。预测的治疗方法与患者最终选择的治疗方法在21/29次(72%)中一致,与预测概率均值的预期一致性(68%)相似。三联疗法在24/29次(83%)中被预测为治疗方法,在20/29次(69%)中被选择。一半的患者(51%)同意完成选择问题有助于他们了解自己的偏好(38%持中立态度,10%不同意)。该工具平均需要15分钟完成,可用性中位数评分为55(系统可用性量表),表明可用性为“尚可”。

结论

在决策辅助工具中使用DCE作为价值澄清任务是可行的,具有促使患者做出以价值观为中心决策的良好潜力。可用性测试表明,在实施之前可能需要进一步修改,或许可以将DCE练习作为更简单决策辅助工具的“附加内容”。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a67/7244245/581cbac401f6/PPA-14-829-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验