Uppsala University Hospital, SE-753 09, Uppsala, Sweden.
Statisticon AB, Uppsala, Sweden.
BMC Cancer. 2022 Sep 22;22(1):1006. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-10098-1.
Longitudinal, real-world data on the management of metastatic breast cancer is increasingly relevant to understand breast cancer care in routine clinical practice. Yet such data are scarce, particularly beyond second- and third-line treatment strategies. This study, therefore, examined both the long-term treatment patterns and overall survival (OS) in a regional Swedish cohort of female patients with metastatic breast cancer stratified by subtype in routine clinical practice during a recent eight-year period and correlation to current treatment guidelines.
Consecutive female patients with metastatic breast cancer clinically managed at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, during 2009-2016 and followed until the end of September, 2017 (n = 370) were included and, where possible, classified as having one of five, intrinsic subtypes: Luminal A; Luminal B; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+)/ estrogen receptor-positive (ER+); HER2+/estrogen receptor-negative (ER-); or triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Treatment patterns and OS were estimated by subtype using time-to-event methods.
A total of 352/370 patients with metastatic breast cancer (mean age 67.6 years) could be subtyped: 118 (34%) were Luminal A, 119 (34%) Luminal B, 31 (8%) HER2+/ER-, 38 (11%) HER2+/Luminal, and 46 (13%) TNBC. The median number of metastatic treatment lines was 3. Most patients were on active treatment during follow-up (80% of the observation period), except for patients with TNBC who were on treatment for 60% of the observation time. Overall, 67% of patients died whilst on treatment. Among all patients (n = 370), median OS was 32.5 months (95% CI = 28.2-35.7). The 5-year survival rate was highest for HER2+/Luminal (46%) patients, followed by Luminal B (29%), Luminal A (28%), HER2+/ER- (21%), and TNBC (7%). Increasing age and number of metastatic sites also predicted worse survival.
Metastatic breast cancer patients in Sweden, irrespective of subtype, generally receive active treatment until time of death. Survival varies considerably across subtypes and is also associated with patient characteristics. Regardless of differences in treatment patterns for Luminal A and B patients, long-term OS was the same.
转移性乳腺癌的长期真实世界数据对于了解常规临床实践中的乳腺癌护理越来越重要。然而,此类数据非常稀缺,尤其是在二线和三线治疗策略之外。因此,本研究在最近八年期间,在瑞典乌普萨拉大学医院对转移性乳腺癌的女性患者进行了连续的临床管理,并按亚型对其进行了分层,以检查常规临床实践中该区域瑞典队列的长期治疗模式和总体生存率(OS),并与当前的治疗指南进行了相关性分析。
纳入了 2009 年至 2016 年期间在瑞典乌普萨拉大学医院接受转移性乳腺癌临床治疗的连续女性患者(n=370),并随访至 2017 年 9 月 30 日(n=370)。根据可能的情况,将患者分为以下五种固有亚型之一:Luminal A;Luminal B;人表皮生长因子受体 2 阳性(HER2+)/雌激素受体阳性(ER+);HER2+/雌激素受体阴性(ER-);或三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)。使用生存时间方法,根据亚型估计治疗模式和 OS。
共有 352/370 名转移性乳腺癌患者(平均年龄 67.6 岁)可进行亚型分类:118 名(34%)为 Luminal A,119 名(34%)为 Luminal B,31 名(8%)为 HER2+/ER-,38 名(11%)为 HER2+/Luminal,46 名(13%)为 TNBC。转移性治疗线数的中位数为 3 条。大多数患者在随访期间(观察期的 80%)接受了积极治疗,而 TNBC 患者除外,他们在观察时间的 60%接受了治疗。总体而言,67%的患者在治疗期间死亡。在所有患者(n=370)中,中位 OS 为 32.5 个月(95%CI=28.2-35.7)。HER2+/Luminal 患者(46%)的 5 年生存率最高,其次是 Luminal B(29%)、Luminal A(28%)、HER2+/ER-(21%)和 TNBC(7%)。年龄和转移性部位的增加也预示着生存率更差。
瑞典的转移性乳腺癌患者,无论亚型如何,通常会接受直至死亡的积极治疗。不同亚型的存活率差异很大,也与患者特征相关。无论 Luminal A 和 B 患者的治疗模式存在差异,长期 OS 是相同的。