Suppr超能文献

磁共振血管造影在急性缺血性脑卒中患者侧支循环评估中的应用:与数字减影血管造影的对比分析

MR Angiography in Assessment of Collaterals in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparative Analysis with Digital Subtraction Angiography.

作者信息

Tsui Brian, Nour May, Chen Iris, Qiao Joe X, Salehi Banafsheh, Yoo Bryan, Colby Geoffrey P, Salamon Noriko, Villablanca Pablo, Jahan Reza, Duckwiler Gary, Saver Jeffrey L, Liebeskind David S, Nael Kambiz

机构信息

Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2022 Sep 2;12(9):1181. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12091181.

Abstract

Collateral status has prognostic and treatment implications in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. Unlike CTA, grading collaterals on MRA is not well studied. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of assessing collaterals on pretreatment MRA in AIS patients against DSA. AIS patients with anterior circulation proximal arterial occlusion with baseline MRA and subsequent endovascular treatment were included. MRA collaterals were evaluated by two neuroradiologists independently using the Tan and Maas scoring systems. DSA collaterals were evaluated by using the American Society of Interventional and Therapeutic Neuroradiology grading system and were used as the reference for comparative analysis against MRA. A total of 104 patients met the inclusion criteria (59 female, age (mean ± SD): 70.8 ± 18.1). The inter-rater agreement () for collateral scoring was 0.49, 95% CI 0.37-0.61 for the Tan score and 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.62 for the Maas score. Total number (%) of sufficient vs. insufficient collaterals based on DSA was 49 (47%) and 55 (53%) respectively. Using the Tan score, 45% of patients with sufficient collaterals and 64% with insufficient collaterals were correctly identified in comparison to DSA, resulting in a poor agreement (0.09, 95% CI 0.1-0.28). Using the Maas score, only 4% of patients with sufficient collaterals and 93% with insufficient collaterals were correctly identified against DSA, resulting in poor agreement (0.03, 95% CI 0.06-0.13). Pretreatment MRA in AIS patients has limited concordance with DSA when grading collaterals using the Tan and Maas scoring systems.

摘要

侧支循环状态对急性缺血性卒中(AIS)患者的预后和治疗具有重要意义。与CTA不同,MRA上侧支循环的分级研究较少。我们旨在评估AIS患者治疗前MRA评估侧支循环相对于DSA的准确性。纳入前循环近端动脉闭塞且有基线MRA及后续血管内治疗的AIS患者。两名神经放射科医生分别使用Tan和Maas评分系统对MRA侧支循环进行评估。使用美国介入和治疗神经放射学会分级系统评估DSA侧支循环,并将其作为与MRA进行对比分析的参考。共有104例患者符合纳入标准(59例女性,年龄(均值±标准差):70.8±18.1)。侧支循环评分的评分者间一致性(),Tan评分的κ值为0.49,95%可信区间为0.37 - 0.61;Maas评分为0.44,95%可信区间为0.26 - 0.62。基于DSA的充分与不充分侧支循环的总数(%)分别为49(47%)和55(53%)。与DSA相比,使用Tan评分时,45%的充分侧支循环患者和64%的不充分侧支循环患者被正确识别,一致性较差(κ = 0.09,95%可信区间为0.1 - 0.28)。使用Maas评分时,与DSA相比,只有4%的充分侧支循环患者和93%的不充分侧支循环患者被正确识别,一致性较差(κ = 0.03,95%可信区间为0.06 - 0.13)。当使用Tan和Maas评分系统对侧支循环进行分级时,AIS患者治疗前MRA与DSA的一致性有限。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3028/9497115/4599d63bf221/brainsci-12-01181-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验