Department of Oncology & Metabolism, The Medical School Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX, UK.
Smithsonian's National Zoo and Conservation Biology Institute, Washington, DC 20008, USA.
Biomolecules. 2022 Sep 14;12(9):1297. doi: 10.3390/biom12091297.
The objective of this review is to ask whether, and how, principles in conservation biology may need to be revisited in light of new knowledge about the power of epigenetics to alter developmental pathways. Importantly, conservation breeding programmes, used widely by zoological parks and aquariums, may appear in some cases to reduce fitness by decreasing animals' abilities to cope when confronted with the 'wild side' of their natural habitats. Would less comfortable captive conditions lead to the selection of individuals that, despite being adapted to life in a captive environment, be better able to thrive if relocated to a more natural environment? While threatened populations may benefit from advanced reproductive technologies, these may actually induce undesirable epigenetic changes. Thus, there may be inherent risks to the health and welfare of offspring (as is suspected in humans). Advanced breeding technologies, especially those that aim to regenerate the rarest species using stem cell reprogramming and artificial gametes, may also lead to unwanted epigenetic modifications. Current knowledge is still incomplete, and therefore ethical decisions about novel breeding methods remain controversial and difficult to resolve.
本次综述旨在探讨,鉴于有关表观遗传学改变发育途径的能力的新知识,是否需要重新审视保护生物学的原则,以及如何重新审视这些原则。重要的是,保护繁殖计划在动物园和水族馆中广泛应用,在某些情况下,这些计划可能会通过降低动物在面对自然栖息地“野性”时的适应能力,从而降低其适应性。不那么舒适的圈养条件是否会导致选择那些尽管适应了圈养环境,但如果被重新安置到更自然的环境中,能够更好地茁壮成长的个体?尽管濒危种群可能受益于先进的繁殖技术,但这些技术实际上可能会诱导不良的表观遗传变化。因此,后代的健康和福利可能存在内在风险(正如人们怀疑的那样)。先进的繁殖技术,尤其是那些旨在使用干细胞重编程和人工配子来再生最稀有的物种的技术,也可能导致不希望出现的表观遗传修饰。目前的知识仍然不完整,因此关于新型繁殖方法的伦理决策仍然存在争议,难以解决。