Hinds M, Ayers G M, Bourland J D, Geddes L A, Tacker W A, Fearnot N
Med Instrum. 1987 Apr;21(2):92-6.
The efficacy of defibrillation using the damped sine and constant-tile (60%) truncated exponential waveforms was determined in each of nine dogs. Two measures of efficacy were used to compare the two waveforms: 1) threshold defibrillation current and 2) percent successful defibrillation. For both measures of efficacy, shock strength was expressed in terms of delivered energy. Mean threshold energy was 0.98 J/kg for the damped sine wave and it was 1.24 J/kg for the truncated exponential waveform. Percent successful defibrillation versus energy/kg curves were constructed for each of the waveforms and were found to be essentially the same. Percent successful defibrillation increased with increasing shock intensity. For 50% success, the energy for the damped sine wave was 1.16 J/kg; for the truncated exponential wave, the corresponding value was 1.15 J/kg. A shock of threshold intensity successfully defibrillated in approximately 50% of the defibrillation attempts, i.e., defibrillation threshold corresponds to about 50% successful defibrillation.
在九条犬中分别测定了使用阻尼正弦波和恒定斜率(60%)截断指数波进行除颤的效果。采用两种效果指标来比较这两种波形:1)除颤阈值电流和2)除颤成功率。对于这两种效果指标,电击强度均以输送能量表示。阻尼正弦波的平均阈值能量为0.98 J/kg,截断指数波的平均阈值能量为1.24 J/kg。为每种波形绘制了除颤成功率与每千克能量的曲线,发现两者基本相同。除颤成功率随电击强度增加而升高。对于50%的成功率,阻尼正弦波的能量为1.16 J/kg;对于截断指数波,相应值为1.15 J/kg。阈值强度的电击在大约50%的除颤尝试中成功除颤,即除颤阈值对应于约50%的除颤成功率。