Wu Zhihui, Chen Xiyou, Ding Daoqun, Zou Shengqi, Li Shenglan, Zhang Xiangyi
Department of Psychology, School of Education Science, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China.
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Aug 29;10(9):1650. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10091650.
(1) Background: The purpose of this study is to provide more nuanced insights into the effects of sub-dimensional levels of psychopathy on moral dilemma judgments. To this end, this study examined the effects of primary and secondary psychopathy on utilitarian and deontological response tendencies. Moreover, this study also explored the mediating role of alexithymia as well as the moderating role of gender in these effects. (2) Methods: A total of 1227 participants were recruited through the online questionnaire service wjx.cn. After deleting unfinished questionnaires, the remaining 1170 participants were included in the final data analysis. Each participant completed a demographic information questionnaire, the Levenson Self-Report Psychopathy Scale, the Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20, and six pairs of moral dilemmas. Descriptive and correlational analyses of study variables were conducted in SPSS 22.0. Mediation and gender difference analyses were conducted in AMOS 23.0. (3) Results: Primary psychopathy was negatively correlated with deontological response tendencies and uncorrelated with utilitarian response tendencies. By contrast, secondary psychopathy also correlated negatively with deontological response tendencies, but it correlated positively with utilitarian response tendencies. Mediation analysis revealed that alexithymia only mediated the relationship between secondary psychopathy and deontological response tendencies. Multi-group analysis revealed that there was no difference between females and males in the indirect effect model. (4) Conclusions: People with high primary psychopathy are less likely to reject harm in moral dilemmas. By contrast, people with high secondary psychopathy have high alexithymia, which causes them to be less concerned about avoiding harm, and they are more likely to maximize outcomes in moral dilemmas. These findings shed new light on the moral dilemma judgments of individuals with primary and secondary psychopathy.
(1) 背景:本研究旨在更细致地洞察精神病态亚维度水平对道德困境判断的影响。为此,本研究考察了原发性和继发性精神病态对功利主义和道义论反应倾向的影响。此外,本研究还探讨了述情障碍的中介作用以及性别在这些影响中的调节作用。(2) 方法:通过问卷星(wjx.cn)在线问卷服务招募了1227名参与者。删除未完成的问卷后,将其余1170名参与者纳入最终数据分析。每位参与者完成了一份人口统计学信息问卷、莱文森自我报告精神病态量表、多伦多述情障碍量表-20以及六对道德困境问题。在SPSS 22.0中对研究变量进行描述性和相关性分析。在AMOS 23.0中进行中介和性别差异分析。(3) 结果:原发性精神病态与道义论反应倾向呈负相关,与功利主义反应倾向不相关。相比之下,继发性精神病态也与道义论反应倾向呈负相关,但与功利主义反应倾向呈正相关。中介分析表明,述情障碍仅在继发性精神病态和道义论反应倾向之间起中介作用。多组分析表明,在间接效应模型中,女性和男性之间没有差异。(4) 结论:原发性精神病态程度高的人在道德困境中拒绝伤害的可能性较小。相比之下,继发性精神病态程度高的人述情障碍程度高,这导致他们不太关注避免伤害,并且在道德困境中更有可能追求结果最大化。这些发现为原发性和继发性精神病态个体的道德困境判断提供了新的见解。