• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选民对联盟协议的短期反应

Voters' short-term responsiveness to coalition deals.

作者信息

Plescia Carolina

机构信息

University of Vienna, Austria.

出版信息

Party Politics. 2022 Sep;28(5):927-938. doi: 10.1177/13540688211029794. Epub 2021 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1177/13540688211029794
PMID:36147248
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9483677/
Abstract

Government formation in multiparty systems requires election winners to strike deals to form a coalition government. Do voters respond and how do they respond to coalition government deals? This paper examines the short-term consequences of coalition government formation on voters in European democracies relying on survey panel data and original content analysis of coalition agreements. It tests theoretical expectations that deal with both the actual and perceived ideological shifts parties make when joining coalition deals as well as the effect of a much simpler heuristic cue based on preferences. The findings indicate that coalition deals have consequences on party preferences, but voter perceptions play a much stronger effect than the actual content of coalition deals. These results have important implications for our understanding of public opinion and provide important insights into the current difficulties and challenges of government formation and representative democracy.

摘要

多党制下组建政府需要选举获胜者达成协议以组建联合政府。选民会做出反应吗?他们如何对联合政府协议做出反应?本文依靠调查面板数据以及对联合协议的原始内容分析,研究欧洲民主国家联合政府组建对选民的短期影响。它检验了一些理论预期,这些预期既涉及政党在达成联合协议时实际发生的和被认为发生的意识形态转变,也涉及基于偏好的一个简单得多的启发式线索的影响。研究结果表明,联合协议会对政党偏好产生影响,但选民的认知比联合协议的实际内容所起的作用要大得多。这些结果对于我们理解公众舆论具有重要意义,并为当前政府组建和代议制民主的困难与挑战提供了重要见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/524c/9483677/c5dfd95ea0b6/10.1177_13540688211029794-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/524c/9483677/3abd5f85501d/10.1177_13540688211029794-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/524c/9483677/5f2a032cd0dc/10.1177_13540688211029794-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/524c/9483677/c5dfd95ea0b6/10.1177_13540688211029794-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/524c/9483677/3abd5f85501d/10.1177_13540688211029794-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/524c/9483677/5f2a032cd0dc/10.1177_13540688211029794-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/524c/9483677/c5dfd95ea0b6/10.1177_13540688211029794-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Voters' short-term responsiveness to coalition deals.选民对联盟协议的短期反应
Party Politics. 2022 Sep;28(5):927-938. doi: 10.1177/13540688211029794. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
2
On the nature of voters' coalition preferences.论选民联盟偏好的本质。
J Elect Public Opin Parties. 2017 Jul 3;27(3):254-273. doi: 10.1080/17457289.2016.1270286. Epub 2016 Dec 26.
3
Governator vs. Hunter and Aggregator: A simulation of party competition with vote-seeking and office-seeking rules.州长对决猎人与聚合者:基于逐票规则和逐职规则的政党竞争模拟
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 2;13(2):e0191649. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191649. eCollection 2018.
4
Sweeping it under the rug: How government parties deal with deteriorating economic conditions.掩盖问题:执政党如何应对日益恶化的经济状况。
Party Politics. 2019 Jan;25(1):63-75. doi: 10.1177/1354068818816967. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
5
The distribution of individual cabinet positions in coalition governments: A sequential approach.联合政府中各个内阁职位的分配:一种序贯方法。
Eur J Polit Res. 2015 Nov;54(4):802-818. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12108. Epub 2015 Aug 24.
6
Do interest groups bias MPs' perception of party voters' preferences?利益集团是否会使议员对党内选民偏好的认知产生偏差?
Party Politics. 2022 May;28(3):567-579. doi: 10.1177/1354068821997079. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Jumping on the Bandwagon: The Role of Voters' Social Class in Poll Effects in the Context of the 2021 German Federal Election.跟风行事:2021年德国联邦选举背景下选民社会阶层在民调效应中的作用
Polit Vierteljahresschr. 2023;64(1):51-78. doi: 10.1007/s11615-022-00417-3. Epub 2022 Aug 10.
8
Income inequality, voters' support for public spending and the size of the welfare state. A simple political model.收入不平等、选民对公共支出的支持与福利国家的规模。一个简单的政治模型。
PLoS One. 2022 Nov 9;17(11):e0277256. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277256. eCollection 2022.
9
Pandemic and Partisan Polarisation: Voter Evaluation of UK Government Handling During Covid-19.大流行与党派两极分化:选民对英国政府在新冠疫情期间应对措施的评估
Schweiz Z Polit. 2021 Jun;27(2):325-338. doi: 10.1111/spsr.12457. Epub 2021 May 6.
10
Australian voters' attitudes to climate action and their social-political determinants.澳大利亚选民对气候行动的态度及其社会政治决定因素。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 24;16(3):e0248268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248268. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Coalition Policy-Making under Constraints: Examining the Role of Preferences and Institutions.受限条件下的联盟决策:审视偏好与制度的作用
West Eur Polit. 2014 May 4;37(3):564-583. doi: 10.1080/01402382.2013.841069. Epub 2013 Oct 9.