Suppr超能文献

PD 生物标志物在生物类似药开发中的作用——要想得到正确的答案,首先必须提出正确的问题。

The Role of PD Biomarkers in Biosimilar Development - To Get the Right Answer One Must First Ask the Right Question.

机构信息

Samsung Bioepis Co., LTD., Incheon, Korea.

出版信息

Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan;113(1):50-54. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2753. Epub 2022 Oct 9.

Abstract

The potential for pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers to improve the efficiency of biosimilar product development and regulatory approval formed the premise for the virtual workshop Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers for Biosimilar Development and Approval hosted by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Duke Margolis, September 2021. Although the possibility of PD biomarkers replacing the to-date routine comparative phase III confirmatory study currently expected by the FDA was discussed, the motivation and feasibility for biosimilar sponsors developing such markers and the regulatory risks entailed largely were not. Even more fundamental is the already established greater comparative value of the pharmacokinetic (PK) study as the most sensitive clinical assay for detecting subtle differences between two products. Consequently, the comparative analytical assessment and the head-to-head PKs will have already answered the core questions as to the biosimilarity of the candidate product to its reference. No further actionable information is obtained with either a PD study or a comparative clinical phase III study even as they may provide some reassurance of what is already known. When a suitable PD biomarker is available for the originator reference product they have already been used for biosimilar development. We must carefully consider the core requirements and timelines inherent in biosimilar development and how they occur in parallel rather than in the series we see for originator products. In order to improve the efficiency of biosimilar development, we need to ask the right questions based on a full understanding of how biosimilars have been developed to date and can be in the future.

摘要

药效动力学(PD)生物标志物有可能提高生物类似药产品开发和监管审批的效率,这构成了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和杜克大学玛格丽特(Margolis)于 2021 年举办的“药效动力学生物标志物在生物类似药开发和审批中的作用”虚拟研讨会的前提。尽管讨论了 PD 生物标志物是否有可能取代目前 FDA 预期的常规 III 期确证性研究,但生物类似药赞助商开发此类标志物的动机和可行性以及所涉及的监管风险在很大程度上并未涉及。更基本的是,药代动力学(PK)研究已经确立了更大的比较价值,作为检测两种产品之间细微差异的最敏感临床检测方法。因此,候选产品与参比产品的生物相似性的比较分析评估和头对头 PK 研究已经回答了核心问题。即使 PD 研究或比较临床 III 期研究可能提供一些已知信息的保证,也不会获得任何进一步的可操作信息。当有合适的 PD 生物标志物可用于参比原研产品时,它们已经用于生物类似药的开发。我们必须仔细考虑生物类似药开发所固有的核心要求和时间表,以及它们如何并行发生,而不是像我们看到的原研产品那样按顺序发生。为了提高生物类似药开发的效率,我们需要在充分了解生物类似药迄今为止的开发方式以及未来可以如何开发的基础上,提出正确的问题。

相似文献

1
The Role of PD Biomarkers in Biosimilar Development - To Get the Right Answer One Must First Ask the Right Question.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan;113(1):50-54. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2753. Epub 2022 Oct 9.
2
Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers for Biosimilar Development and Approval: A Workshop Summary.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 May;113(5):1030-1035. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2795. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
3
Pharmacodynamic Biomarkers Evidentiary Considerations for Biosimilar Development and Approval.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan;113(1):55-61. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2761. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
5
The US approach to biosimilars: the long-awaited FDA approval pathway.
BioDrugs. 2012 Dec 1;26(6):357-61. doi: 10.2165/11635830-000000000-00000.
7
Development of biosimilars.
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2016 Apr;45(5 Suppl):S11-8. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2016.01.002. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Considerations related to comparative clinical studies for biosimilars.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2021 Mar;20(3):265-274. doi: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1876024. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
9
Biosimilars: A consideration of the regulations in the United States and European union.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.12.013. Epub 2015 Dec 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Regulatory Evaluation of Biosimilars: Refinement of Principles Based on the Scientific Evidence and Clinical Experience.
BioDrugs. 2022 May;36(3):359-371. doi: 10.1007/s40259-022-00533-x. Epub 2022 May 21.
2
Analytical Similarity Assessment of Biosimilars: Global Regulatory Landscape, Recent Studies and Major Advancements in Orthogonal Platforms.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022 Feb 9;10:832059. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.832059. eCollection 2022.
3
Comparability of Biologics: Global Principles, Evidentiary Consistency and Unrealized Reliance.
BioDrugs. 2021 Jul;35(4):379-387. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00488-5. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
4
Extrapolation: Experience gained from original biologics.
Drug Discov Today. 2021 Aug;26(8):2003-2013. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.05.006. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Streamlined approval of biosimilars: moving on from the confirmatory efficacy trial.
Drug Discov Today. 2020 Sep 9. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2020.09.006.
6
The Path Towards a Tailored Clinical Biosimilar Development.
BioDrugs. 2020 Jun;34(3):297-306. doi: 10.1007/s40259-020-00422-1.
7
Delivering on the Promise of Biosimilars.
BioDrugs. 2019 Dec;33(6):599-602. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00388-9.
8
An Efficient Development Paradigm for Biosimilars.
BioDrugs. 2019 Dec;33(6):603-611. doi: 10.1007/s40259-019-00371-4.
9
The End of Phase 3 Clinical Trials in Biosimilars Development?
BioDrugs. 2018 Aug;32(4):319-324. doi: 10.1007/s40259-018-0287-0.
10
Maintaining consistent quality and clinical performance of biopharmaceuticals.
Expert Opin Biol Ther. 2018 Apr;18(4):369-379. doi: 10.1080/14712598.2018.1421169. Epub 2018 Jan 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验