• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜辅助手术与开腹手术治疗横结肠癌的多中心回顾性研究。

Laparoscopic-assisted surgery versus open surgery for transverse colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan.

Department of Surgery, Yokohama Minami Kyosai Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

J Cancer Res Ther. 2022 Jul-Sep;18(4):898-902. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_946_20.

DOI:10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_946_20
PMID:36149137
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Previous randomized controlled trials demonstrated similar oncological outcomes between laparoscopic-assisted (LA) and open (OP) colectomy; however, patients with transverse colon cancer were not analyzed. The aim of this study was to confirm the oncological safety and the advantages of the short- and long-term results of LA surgery for transverse colon cancer in comparison to OP surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study data were retrospectively collected from the databases of four hospitals. Patients with transverse colon cancer who underwent LA or OP R0 or R1 resection were registered.

RESULTS

Among the 204 patients, 149 underwent OP colectomy and 55 underwent LA colectomy. The median follow-up period was 43 months. The rate of conversion to OP resection was 7.3%. The 5-year overall survival rate of the LA group was higher than that of the OP surgery group for all-stage patients (97.5% vs. 91.1%, P = 0.108), and it was similar in Stage II and Stage III patients (94.1% vs. 94.2%, P = 0.510). The LA group had significantly lower blood loss and a significantly longer operative time in comparison to the OP surgery group. Furthermore, the postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter (9 vs. 13 days, P = 0.001) and the incidence of Grade ≥III complications was lower in the LA group (3.7% vs. 14.8%, P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

We concluded that LA surgery for transverse colon cancer is oncologically safe and yields better short-term results in comparison to OP surgery.

摘要

介绍

先前的随机对照试验表明,腹腔镜辅助(LA)和开放(OP)结直肠切除术的肿瘤学结果相似;然而,未对横结肠癌患者进行分析。本研究旨在确认 LA 手术治疗横结肠癌的肿瘤学安全性和短期及长期结果优势,并与 OP 手术进行比较。

材料和方法

本研究的数据是从四家医院的数据库中回顾性收集的。登记了接受 LA 或 OP R0 或 R1 切除术的横结肠癌患者。

结果

在 204 例患者中,149 例行 OP 结肠切除术,55 例行 LA 结肠切除术。中位随访时间为 43 个月。中转 OP 切除术的比率为 7.3%。LA 组的 5 年总生存率高于 OP 手术组的所有分期患者(97.5% vs. 91.1%,P = 0.108),且 II 期和 III 期患者相似(94.1% vs. 94.2%,P = 0.510)。与 OP 手术组相比,LA 组的出血量更少,手术时间更长。此外,LA 组的术后住院时间明显更短(9 天 vs. 13 天,P = 0.001),且 III 级及以上并发症的发生率更低(3.7% vs. 14.8%,P = 0.031)。

结论

我们得出结论,LA 手术治疗横结肠癌在肿瘤学上是安全的,与 OP 手术相比,短期结果更好。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic-assisted surgery versus open surgery for transverse colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective study.腹腔镜辅助手术与开腹手术治疗横结肠癌的多中心回顾性研究。
J Cancer Res Ther. 2022 Jul-Sep;18(4):898-902. doi: 10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_946_20.
2
Laparoscopic versus open resection for transverse and descending colon cancer: Short-term and long-term outcomes of a multicenter retrospective study of 1830 patients.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗横结肠癌和降结肠癌:1830例患者多中心回顾性研究的短期和长期结果
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2017 Aug;10(3):268-275. doi: 10.1111/ases.12373. Epub 2017 Apr 7.
3
Oncological outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robotic colectomy in patients with transverse colon cancer.开腹、腹腔镜和机器人结肠切除术治疗横结肠癌的肿瘤学结果。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Oct;26(10):821-830. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02650-9. Epub 2022 Jul 8.
4
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer.腹腔镜横结肠癌切除术的短期疗效。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 May;14(5):818-23. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1182-2. Epub 2010 Mar 12.
5
Laparoscopic Surgery for Transverse Colon Cancer: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes in Comparison with Conventional Open Surgery.腹腔镜手术治疗横结肠癌:与传统开放手术相比的短期和长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2015 Dec;25(12):982-9. doi: 10.1089/lap.2015.0122. Epub 2015 Nov 19.
6
Laparoscopic vs open approach for transverse colon cancer. A systematic review and meta-analysis of short and long term outcomes.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗横结肠癌:短期和长期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 May;41:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.03.050. Epub 2017 Mar 24.
7
Outcome of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Transverse Colon Cancer.腹腔镜与开放手术切除横结肠癌的疗效比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 2015 Oct;19(10):1869-74. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2891-3. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
Laparoscopic Colectomy Versus Open Colectomy for Treatment of Transverse Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腹腔镜结肠切除术与开放结肠切除术治疗横结肠癌的系统评价和Meta分析
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Oct;27(10):1038-1050. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0031. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
9
Optimal Surgery for Mid-Transverse Colon Cancer: Laparoscopic Extended Right Hemicolectomy Versus Laparoscopic Transverse Colectomy.横结肠中部癌的最佳手术方式:腹腔镜扩大右半结肠切除术与腹腔镜横结肠切除术的比较
World J Surg. 2018 Oct;42(10):3398-3404. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4612-z.
10
Lymph Node Mapping in Transverse Colon Cancer Treated Using Laparoscopic Colectomy With D3 Lymph Node Dissection.腹腔镜结肠癌根治术 D3 淋巴结清扫治疗横结肠癌的淋巴结图谱
Dis Colon Rectum. 2022 Mar 1;65(3):340-352. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000002108.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and Outcomes of Laparoscopic Surgery in Low-Resource Settings: Lessons From Two African Healthcare Systems-A Narrative Review.资源匮乏地区腹腔镜手术的趋势与结果:来自两个非洲医疗系统的经验——一篇叙述性综述
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 24;7(12):e70304. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70304. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic and open colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开腹横结肠癌根治术的生存结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 May 1;38(1):111. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04414-9.