UC Davis, Davis, CA, United States of America.
University of Essex, Colchester, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2022 Sep 23;17(9):e0273951. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273951. eCollection 2022.
We analyze how parties respond programmatically to populist parties in power abroad. Political parties often copy the policies of governing parties in other countries-a phenomenon that contributes to waves of transnational policy diffusion. We report the first large-scale comparative study showing that populist parties in government abroad trigger the opposite reaction: instead of inspiring emulation, their highly visible governing dilemmas provoke a policy backlash by parties in other states. We argue that dilemmas arise because populist parties confront unique and debilitating trade-offs between maintaining their anti-system posture and governing effectively, which make them electorally vulnerable. Other parties observe foreign populists' governing dilemmas and respond by distancing themselves in order to avoid these problems. We detect this "foreign populist backlash effect" using spatial econometric analysis, a method that allows us to estimate international policy connections between parties, applied to over 200 European parties' programmatic positions since the 1970s. Our findings illuminate parties' election strategies and show that this backlash effect constrains the spread of populism across Western democracies.
我们分析了政党在多大程度上会根据国外执政的民粹主义政党来调整自身的纲领。政治纲领通常会复制其他国家执政党的政策——这种现象推动了跨国政策的扩散浪潮。我们报告了第一项大规模的比较研究,表明执政的民粹主义政党在国外引发了相反的反应:它们高度可见的执政困境并没有激发效仿,反而引发了其他国家政党的政策反弹。我们认为,困境是由于民粹主义政党在维持反体制立场和有效治理之间面临独特且削弱实力的权衡取舍,这使得它们在选举中变得脆弱。其他政党观察到外国民粹主义者的执政困境,并通过拉开距离来做出回应,以避免这些问题。我们使用空间计量经济学分析来检测这种“外国民粹主义反弹效应”,这种方法可以让我们估计政党之间的国际政策联系,并应用于自 20 世纪 70 年代以来 200 多个欧洲政党的纲领性立场。我们的研究结果阐明了政党的选举策略,并表明这种反弹效应限制了民粹主义在西方民主国家的传播。