Suppr超能文献

创伤患者的院前头孢唑林给药。

Prehospital Administration of Cefazolin in Trauma Patients.

机构信息

AirLink/VitaLink Critical Care Transport, Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC.

Department of Pharmacy, Novant Health New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, NC.

出版信息

Air Med J. 2022 Sep-Oct;41(5):447-450. doi: 10.1016/j.amj.2022.06.001. Epub 2022 Jul 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A lack of research has become a barrier to the common use of prehospital antibiotics. The objective of this study is to further the limited research of prehospital antibiotics through evaluating the clinical impact, safety, and reliability of prehospital cefazolin administration in trauma patients.

METHODS

We completed a retrospective evaluation of adult trauma patients who were transported by a single air and ground critical care transport program between January 1, 2014, and June 30 2017. Two hundred eighty-two patients received prehospital cefazolin for deep wounds or open fractures before their arrival at a single level 2 trauma center during the study period. Patient demographics, mechanism of injury, injury type, infection rate, and identification of allergic reactions to cefazolin were also collected.

RESULTS

Of 278 patients in the final analysis, 35.3% (n = 98) were diagnosed with an open fracture and 58.6% (n = 163) had a deep tissue injury. Eighty-two percent of prehospital open fracture diagnoses were confirmed in the emergency department. The overall infection rate was 6%; 31.3% of patients received a second dose of cefazolin in the emergency department during the study period. No patients receiving prehospital cefazolin had allergic or anaphylactic reactions. The overadministration rate was 5% (n = 14).

CONCLUSION

Prehospital providers reliably identified open fractures, and prehospital cefazolin administration was not associated with anaphylactic reactions. This study population's infection rate of open fractures caused by traumatic injury was found to be 6%, and there was a low inappropriate administration rate.

摘要

目的

缺乏研究已成为普遍使用院前抗生素的障碍。本研究的目的是通过评估创伤患者院前头孢唑林给药的临床影响、安全性和可靠性,进一步研究有限的院前抗生素研究。

方法

我们对 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间通过单一空中和地面重症监护转运计划转运的成年创伤患者进行了回顾性评估。在研究期间,有 282 名患者因深部伤口或开放性骨折在到达单一 2 级创伤中心之前接受了院前头孢唑林治疗。还收集了患者的人口统计学、损伤机制、损伤类型、感染率以及对头孢唑林过敏反应的识别情况。

结果

在最终分析的 278 名患者中,35.3%(n=98)被诊断为开放性骨折,58.6%(n=163)有深部组织损伤。82%的院前开放性骨折诊断在急诊科得到确认。总的感染率为 6%;研究期间,有 31.3%的患者在急诊科接受了第二剂头孢唑林。接受院前头孢唑林治疗的患者均未出现过敏或过敏反应。超剂量给药率为 5%(n=14)。

结论

院前提供者可靠地识别了开放性骨折,并且院前头孢唑林给药与过敏反应无关。本研究人群创伤性损伤引起的开放性骨折感染率为 6%,且不适当给药率较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验