Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (DSTL), Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA), formerly Public Health England (PHE), Porton Down, Salisbury, UK.
Vaccine. 2022 Oct 6;40(42):6163-6178. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.08.052. Epub 2022 Sep 22.
We undertook a Phase 4 clinical trial to assess the effect of time interval between booster doses on serological responses to AVP. The primary objective was to evaluate responses to a single booster dose in two groups of healthy adults who had previously received a complete 4-dose primary course. Group A had received doses on schedule while Group B had not had one for ≥2 years. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the safety and tolerability of AVP booster doses, and to gain information on correlates of protection to aid future anthrax vaccine development. Blood samples were taken on Day 1 before dosing, and on Days 8, 15, 29 and 120, to measure Toxin Neutralisation Assay (TNA) NF values and concentrations of IgG antibodies against Protective Antigen (PA), Lethal Factor (LF) and Edema Factor (EF) by ELISA. For each serological parameter, fold changes from baseline following the trial AVP dose were greater in Group B than Group A at every time-point studied. Peak responses correlated positively with time since last AVP dose (highest values being observed after intervals of ≥10 years), and negatively with number of previous doses (highest values occurring in individuals who had received a primary course only). In 2017, having reviewed these results, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) updated UK anthrax vaccination guidelines, extending the interval between routine AVP boosters from one to 10 years. Booster doses of AVP induce significant IgG responses against the three anthrax toxin components, particularly PA and LF. Similarly high responses were observed in TNA, a recognised surrogate for anthrax vaccine efficacy. Analysis of the 596 TNA results showed that anti-PA and anti-LF IgG make substantial independent contributions to neutralisation of anthrax lethal toxin. AVP may therefore have advantages over anthrax vaccines that depend on generating immunity to PA alone.
我们进行了一项 4 期临床试验,以评估加强剂量之间的时间间隔对 AVP 血清反应的影响。主要目的是评估两组先前接受过完整 4 剂初级疗程的健康成年人单次加强剂量的反应。A 组按计划接种,而 B 组已超过 2 年未接种。次要目标是评估 AVP 加强剂量的安全性和耐受性,并获得有助于未来炭疽疫苗开发的保护相关信息。在给药前的第 1 天(Day 1)以及第 8、15、29 和 120 天采集血样,以通过毒素中和测定(Toxin Neutralisation Assay,TNA)测量 NF 值和针对保护性抗原(PA)、致死因子(Lethal Factor,LF)和水肿因子(Edema Factor,EF)的 IgG 抗体浓度,ELISA 法。对于每个血清学参数,在研究的每个时间点,与组 A 相比,组 B 在试验 AVP 剂量后的基础值的倍数变化均更大。峰值反应与上次 AVP 剂量后时间呈正相关(间隔超过 10 年时观察到最高值),与之前接种次数呈负相关(仅接受初级疗程的个体中观察到最高值)。2017 年,在审查了这些结果后,疫苗接种和免疫联合委员会(Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation,JCVI)更新了英国炭疽疫苗接种指南,将常规 AVP 加强剂的间隔从 1 年延长至 10 年。AVP 加强剂可诱导针对三种炭疽毒素成分(尤其是 PA 和 LF)的显著 IgG 反应。在 TNA 中也观察到类似的高反应,TNA 是炭疽疫苗效力的公认替代物。对 596 份 TNA 结果的分析表明,抗-PA 和抗-LF IgG 对炭疽致死毒素的中和做出了实质性的独立贡献。因此,AVP 可能比仅依赖于产生对 PA 免疫的炭疽疫苗具有优势。