Sanna Valeria, Fedele Palma, Deiana Giulia, Alicicco Maria G, Ninniri Chiara, Santoro Anna N, Pazzola Antonio, Fancellu Alessandro
Unit of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Sassari, Sassari 07100, Italy.
Unit of Medical Oncology, Hospital "D. Camberlingio", Francavilla Fontana 72100, Brindisi, Italy.
World J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jul 24;13(7):577-586. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i7.577.
Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in high-risk breast cancer. However, no universally accepted guidelines exist on pre-chemotherapy assessment. In particular, the number and frequency of medical visits vary according to each institution's policy. We hypothesised that the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) may have a favourable impact on the pre-treatment assessment in candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy.
To investigate whether the ESAS can be used to safely reduce the number of medical visits in women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.
In a retrospectively prospective matched-pair analysis, 100 patients who completed the ESAS questionnaire before administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (ESAS Group) were compared with 100 patients who underwent chemotherapy according to the traditional modality, without ESAS (no-ESAS Group). Patients of the ESAS Group received additional visits before treatment if their ESAS score was > 3. The primary endpoint was the total number of medical visits during the entire duration of the chemotherapy period. The secondary endpoints were the occurrence of severe complications (grade 3-4) and the number of unplanned visits during the chemotherapy period.
The study variables did not statistically differ between patients of the ESAS Group and no-ESAS Group (age 0.880; breast cancer stage 0.56; cancer histology 0.415; tumour size 0.258; lymph node status 0.883; immunohistochemical classification 0.754; type of surgery 0.157), except for premenopausal status ( 0.015). The study variables did not statistically differ between patients of the ESAS Group and no-ESAS Group regarding age, cancer stage, histology, tumour size, lymph node status, immunohistochemical classification, and type of surgery. Unplanned visits during the entire duration of chemotherapy were 8 in the ESAS Group and 18 in the no-ESAS Group visits ( 0.035). Grade 3-4 toxicity did not differ between the study groups ( 0.652). Forty-eight patients of the ESAS Group received additional visits due to an ESAS score > 3. The mean number of medical visits was 4.38 ± 0.51 in the ESAS Group and 16.18 ± 1.82 in the no-ESAS group ( 0.001). With multivariate analysis, women of the ESAS group were more likely to undergo additional visits for an ESAS score > 3 if they were aged 60 or older, received a mastectomy, or had tumour stage II/III.
The ESAS score may safely reduce the number of medical visits in candidates for adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer. Our results suggest that the ESAS score may be used for selecting a group of breast cancer patients for whom it is safe to reduce the number of medical visits in the setting of adjuvant chemotherapy. This may translate into several advantages, such as a more rational utilization of human resources and a possible reduction of coronavirus pandemic infection risk in oncologic patients.
高危乳腺癌患者推荐接受辅助化疗。然而,目前尚无关于化疗前评估的普遍接受的指南。特别是,就诊次数和频率因各机构的政策而异。我们推测,埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)可能对辅助化疗候选患者的治疗前评估产生有利影响。
研究ESAS是否可用于安全减少接受辅助化疗的乳腺癌女性的就诊次数。
在一项回顾性前瞻性配对分析中,将100例在辅助化疗前完成ESAS问卷的患者(ESAS组)与100例按照传统方式接受化疗、未使用ESAS的患者(无ESAS组)进行比较。如果ESAS组患者的ESAS评分>3,则在治疗前增加就诊次数。主要终点是化疗期间的总就诊次数。次要终点是严重并发症(3-4级)的发生情况以及化疗期间的非计划就诊次数。
ESAS组和无ESAS组患者的研究变量在统计学上无差异(年龄P = 0.880;乳腺癌分期P = 0.56;癌症组织学P = 0.415;肿瘤大小P = 0.258;淋巴结状态P = 0.883;免疫组化分类P = 0.754;手术类型P = 0.157),绝经前状态除外(P = 0.015)。ESAS组和无ESAS组患者在年龄、癌症分期、组织学、肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、免疫组化分类和手术类型方面的研究变量在统计学上无差异。ESAS组在整个化疗期间的非计划就诊次数为8次,无ESAS组为18次(P = 0.035)。研究组之间3-4级毒性无差异(P = 0.652)。ESAS组有48例患者因ESAS评分>3而增加就诊次数。ESAS组的平均就诊次数为4.38±0.51次,无ESAS组为16.18±1.82次(P = 0.001)。多因素分析显示,ESAS组年龄≥60岁、接受乳房切除术或肿瘤分期为II/III期的女性更有可能因ESAS评分>3而增加就诊次数。
ESAS评分可安全减少早期乳腺癌辅助化疗候选患者的就诊次数。我们的结果表明,ESAS评分可用于选择一组乳腺癌患者,在辅助化疗时减少就诊次数是安全的。这可能转化为几个优势,如更合理地利用人力资源以及可能降低肿瘤患者感染冠状病毒大流行的风险。