• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死多支血管病变患者的分期血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较

Staged revascularization vs. culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

作者信息

Lang Jiachun, Wang Chen, Wang Le, Zhang Jingxia, Hu Yuecheng, Sun Huajun, Cong Hongliang, Liu Yin

机构信息

Clinical School of Thoracic, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.

Department of Cardiology, Tianjin Chest Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 9;9:943323. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.943323. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.943323
PMID:36158792
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9500352/
Abstract

BACKGROUNDAND OBJECTIVE

Studies have highlighted the significant role of staged percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for a multivessel disease (MVD) among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the relative benefit of staged vs. culprit-only PCI for MVD in elderly patients with STEMI remains undetermined. Thus, the present study compared the clinical outcomes of staged and culprit-only PCI in this cohort.

METHODS

From January 2014 to September 2019, 617 patients aged ≥65 years with STEMI and MVD who underwent primary PCI of the culprit vessels within 12 h of symptom onset were enrolled. They were then categorized into the staged and culprit-only PCI groups according to intervention strategy. Propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to adjust for confounding factors between groups. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), a composite of all-cause death, cardiac death, recurrent myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and ischemia-driven revascularization.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up of 56 months, 209 patients experienced MACCE and 119 died. Staged revascularization was associated with a lower risk of MACCE, all-cause death, and cardiac death than culprit-only PCI in both overall patients and the PSM cohorts. In contrast, there was no significant difference in stroke or ischemia-driven revascularization. Moreover, on multivariate Cox regression analysis, staged PCI was a significant predictor of a lower incidence of MACCE and all-cause death.

CONCLUSION

In elderly patients with STEMI and MVD, staged PCI is superior to culprit-only PCI.

摘要

背景与目的

研究强调了分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)在ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者多支血管病变(MVD)中的重要作用。然而,在老年STEMI患者中,分期PCI与仅对罪犯血管进行PCI治疗MVD的相对获益仍未确定。因此,本研究比较了该队列中分期PCI与仅对罪犯血管进行PCI的临床结局。

方法

纳入2014年1月至2019年9月期间617例年龄≥65岁、患有STEMI和MVD且在症状发作12小时内接受了罪犯血管直接PCI的患者。然后根据干预策略将他们分为分期PCI组和仅对罪犯血管进行PCI组。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来调整组间的混杂因素。主要终点是主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCE),包括全因死亡、心源性死亡、再发心肌梗死(MI)、中风和缺血驱动的血运重建。

结果

在平均56个月的随访期间,209例患者发生MACCE,119例死亡。在总体患者和PSM队列中,分期血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行PCI相比,MACCE、全因死亡和心源性死亡风险更低。相比之下,中风或缺血驱动的血运重建方面无显著差异。此外,多因素Cox回归分析显示,分期PCI是MACCE和全因死亡发生率较低的显著预测因素。

结论

在老年STEMI和MVD患者中,分期PCI优于仅对罪犯血管进行PCI。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/9500352/765775fa2bf5/fcvm-09-943323-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/9500352/397e55cf23b3/fcvm-09-943323-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/9500352/765775fa2bf5/fcvm-09-943323-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/9500352/397e55cf23b3/fcvm-09-943323-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2976/9500352/765775fa2bf5/fcvm-09-943323-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Staged revascularization vs. culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel disease in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死多支血管病变患者的分期血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Sep 9;9:943323. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.943323. eCollection 2022.
2
Staged complete revascularization or culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention for multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and diabetes.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并糖尿病患者多支冠状动脉病变行分期完全血运重建或罪犯血管单纯经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2019 Sep 17;18(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12933-019-0923-0.
3
Long-Term Safety and Efficacy of Staged Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的长期安全性和疗效。
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Aug 1;124(3):334-342. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.04.048. Epub 2019 May 8.
4
Long-term outcomes of in-hospital staged revascularization versus culprit-only intervention for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者住院期间分期血运重建与仅对罪犯血管进行干预的长期结局
Coron Artery Dis. 2019 May;30(3):188-195. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000701.
5
Early versus late delayed percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者早期与晚期延迟经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较。
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2023 Jun;35(6):1317-1324. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02417-8. Epub 2023 May 12.
6
Culprit vessel vs. immediate multivessel vs. out-of-hospital staged intervention for patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的罪犯血管干预与即刻多支血管干预及院外分期干预对比
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Nov 23;9:1033475. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1033475. eCollection 2022.
7
Impact of the Residual SYNTAX Score on Outcomes of Revascularization in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease.残余SYNTAX评分对ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者血运重建结局的影响
Clin Med Insights Cardiol. 2016 Mar 9;10:29-35. doi: 10.4137/CMC.S35730. eCollection 2016.
8
Culprit Vessel-Only vs. Staged Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病患者中,罪犯血管单独干预与分期多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的比较
Circ J. 2016;80(2):371-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0493. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
9
Outcome of staged percutaneous coronary intervention within two weeks from admission in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者入院后两周内行分期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Apr 1;93(5):E262-E268. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27896. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
10
Meta-Analysis of Culprit-Only Versus Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者仅针对罪犯血管与多支血管行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;121(5):529-536. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.11.022. Epub 2017 Dec 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Predictors of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events after percutaneous coronary intervention in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.老年患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后主要心脑血管不良事件的预测因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Apr 12;24(1):337. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-04896-4.
2
Revascularization Modalities in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Review of the Current State of Evidence.急性冠状动脉综合征的血运重建方式:证据现状综述
Cureus. 2023 Oct 17;15(10):e47207. doi: 10.7759/cureus.47207. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Prognosis Between ST-Elevation and Non-ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction in Older Adult Patients.老年患者ST段抬高型与非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的预后
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jan 3;8:749072. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.749072. eCollection 2021.
2
Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.多支血管 PCI 治疗心肌梗死的完全血运重建。
N Engl J Med. 2019 Oct 10;381(15):1411-1421. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1907775. Epub 2019 Sep 1.
3
Age, STEMI, and Cardiogenic Shock: Never Too Old for PCI?年龄、ST段抬高型心肌梗死与心源性休克:接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗是否永无年龄上限?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Apr 23;73(15):1901-1904. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.12.088.
4
2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2017年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)ST段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 7;39(2):119-177. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393.
5
Culprit Vessel Versus Multivessel Versus In-Hospital Staged Intervention for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Stratified Analyses in High-Risk Patient Groups and Anatomic Subsets of Nonculprit Disease.罪犯血管与多血管与住院分期介入治疗 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多血管病变患者:高危患者群体和非罪犯病变的解剖亚组的分层分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jan 9;10(1):11-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.10.024.
6
PCI Strategies in Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉病变患者的 PCI 策略。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Sep 6;68(10):1066-81. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.05.086.
7
Culprit Vessel-Only vs. Staged Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Strategies in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.在接受ST段抬高型心肌梗死直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的多支冠状动脉疾病患者中,罪犯血管单独干预与分期多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗策略的比较
Circ J. 2016;80(2):371-8. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0493. Epub 2015 Nov 20.
8
2015 ACC/AHA/SCAI Focused Update on Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: An Update of the 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and the 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.2015年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会关于ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的重点更新:2011年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会/心血管造影和介入学会经皮冠状动脉介入治疗指南及2013年美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会ST段抬高型心肌梗死管理指南的更新
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Mar 15;67(10):1235-1250. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
9
Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.完全血运重建与罪犯病变治疗在 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死和多血管病变患者中的比较(DANAMI-3—PRIMULTI):一项开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2015 Aug 15;386(9994):665-71. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)60648-1.
10
Long-term ischaemic and bleeding outcomes after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the elderly.老年ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后的长期缺血和出血结局
Neth Heart J. 2015 Sep;23(10):477-482. doi: 10.1007/s12471-015-0733-2.