• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

研究间差异:它们应如何影响结果的解释与分析?

Inter-study differences: how should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results?

作者信息

Bailey K R

出版信息

Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):351-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060327.

DOI:10.1002/sim.4780060327
PMID:3616288
Abstract

In determining the role inter-study variation should play in an overview analysis, it is important to consider three factors: which question one is trying to answer; the degree of similarity or dissimilarity of design, and the degree to which heterogeneity of outcomes can be explained. Three questions one might be interested in are: whether treatment can be effective in some circumstances; whether treatment is effective on average, and whether treatment was effective on average in the trials at hand. Under the assumption of no qualitative interaction, the answers to these questions coincide. The O-E analysis most directly answers the third question. Other analyses are suggested when the first question is of interest, using the aspirin post-MI studies as an example.

摘要

在确定研究间变异在概述分析中应发挥的作用时,考虑三个因素很重要:一是试图回答的问题;二是设计的相似或不同程度;三是结果异质性能够得到解释的程度。可能感兴趣的三个问题是:治疗在某些情况下是否有效;治疗平均而言是否有效;以及治疗在手头的试验中平均而言是否有效。在不存在定性交互作用的假设下,这些问题的答案是一致的。观察值与期望值(O-E)分析最直接地回答了第三个问题。当对第一个问题感兴趣时,以心肌梗死后阿司匹林的研究为例,建议采用其他分析方法。

相似文献

1
Inter-study differences: how should they influence the interpretation and analysis of results?研究间差异:它们应如何影响结果的解释与分析?
Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):351-60. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060327.
2
Obtaining medically meaningful answers from an overview of randomized clinical trials.
Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):281-94. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060314.
3
Implications of overviews of randomized trials.随机试验综述的意义
Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):397-409. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060337.
4
The role of overviews in cancer therapeutics.
Stat Med. 1987 Apr-May;6(3):389-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780060335.
5
What is next in ALS clinical trials?肌萎缩侧索硬化症临床试验的下一步是什么?
Neurology. 2007 Aug 21;69(8):719-20. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000271093.41793.ff.
6
Optimizing trials of renal artery stenting: are optimal performance goals optimal?优化肾动脉支架置入术试验:最佳性能目标是否最优?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Nov 1;78(5):790-1. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23382.
7
Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.急性缺血性脑卒中动脉内脑溶栓的试验设计与报告标准。
Stroke. 2003 Aug;34(8):e109-37. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000082721.62796.09. Epub 2003 Jul 17.
8
Time for changes in the design, analysis, and reporting of rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials.
Arthritis Rheum. 1990 Jan;33(1):140-9. doi: 10.1002/art.1780330119.
9
IPEG guideline on statistical design and analysis for pharmacodynamic trials. International Pharmaco-EEG Group.国际药物脑电图组关于药效学试验统计设计与分析的指南。国际药物脑电图组。
Neuropsychobiology. 1999;39(2):92-100. doi: 10.1159/000026567.
10
Statistical considerations in the design, analysis and interpretation of clinical studies that use patient-reported outcomes.使用患者报告结局的临床研究在设计、分析和解释中的统计学考量。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2014 Oct;23(5):393-7. doi: 10.1177/0962280213498013.

引用本文的文献

1
The effectiveness of unsupervised home-based exercise for improving lower extremity physical function in older adults in Western and Eastern cultures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.基于家庭的无监督锻炼对改善东西方文化背景下老年人下肢身体功能的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):800. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05393-4.
2
Harmonizing across datasets to improve the transferability of drug combination prediction.跨数据集协调以提高药物组合预测的可转移性。
Commun Biol. 2023 Apr 11;6(1):397. doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-04783-5.
3
Local anesthetics and regional anesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children: A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis update.
局部麻醉和区域麻醉与常规镇痛在预防成人和儿童持续性术后疼痛的比较:一项 Cochrane 系统评价和荟萃分析更新。
J Clin Anesth. 2019 Aug;55:116-127. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2018.12.043. Epub 2019 Jan 11.
4
Does vitamin D supplementation alleviate chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain? A systematic review and meta-analysis.补充维生素D能否缓解慢性非特异性肌肉骨骼疼痛?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Rheumatol. 2017 May;36(5):1201-1208. doi: 10.1007/s10067-016-3205-1. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
5
Partial protection against 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) of seasonal influenza vaccination and related regional factors: Updated systematic review and meta-analyses.季节性流感疫苗接种对2009年甲型H1N1大流行性流感的部分保护作用及相关区域因素:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2015;11(6):1337-44. doi: 10.4161/21645515.2014.985495.
6
Mentoring Programs to Affect Delinquency and Associated Outcomes of Youth At-Risk: A Comprehensive Meta-Analytic Review.影响青少年犯罪及相关风险结果的指导计划:一项综合荟萃分析综述
J Exp Criminol. 2014 Jun 1;10(2):179-206. doi: 10.1007/s11292-013-9181-4.
7
The Oxford Implementation Index: a new tool for incorporating implementation data into systematic reviews and meta-analyses.牛津实施指数:将实施数据纳入系统评价和荟萃分析的新工具。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2013 Aug;66(8):874-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.03.006.
8
Investigating clinical heterogeneity in systematic reviews: a methodologic review of guidance in the literature.系统评价中临床异质性的研究:文献中指导方法的综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Jul 30;12:111. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-111.
9
Evaluation of the United States Department Of Agriculture Northeast Area-wide Tick Control Project by meta-analysis.运用荟萃分析评估美国农业部东北地区区域范围蜱虫控制项目。
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2009 Aug;9(4):423-30. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0150.
10
A re-evaluation of random-effects meta-analysis.随机效应荟萃分析的重新评估。
J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc. 2009 Jan;172(1):137-159. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00552.x.