Liang Ian Ju, Perkin Oliver J, McGuigan Polly M, Spellanzon Bruno, Robb Molly, Liu Chien-Yu, Lin Linda L, Thompson Dylan, Western Max J
Department for Health, University of Bath, 1 West 5.108, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Centre for Nutrition, Exercise and Metabolism, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Oct 1;24(1):800. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05393-4.
Ageing leads to decreased physical function, which can impact independent living and raise health risks, increasing demand on healthcare resources. Finding affordable and accessible exercise to improve physical function is necessary for a population seemingly resistant to strength and balance training in leisure settings. This review aimed to evaluate whether unsupervised home-based exercises improve lower extremity function in older adults.
We systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster RCTs investigating unsupervised home-based exercises' effects on physical function in older adults through English and Mandarin databases. Studies' methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analyses were conducted on lower extremity functions outcomes.
Of the 6791 identified articles, 10 English studies (907 participants) were included, 8 studies (839 participants) were used for final meta-analysis, with no Mandarin studies. Studies were largely based in Europe with mostly moderate risk of bias. Most interventions were multicomponent lasting 10-40 min/session, 3 times/week. Meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in 5 sit-to-stand (p = 0.05; I = 0%), maximal knee extension strength (p = 0.61; I = 71%), 10 m maximal walking speed (p = 0.22; I = 30%), timed-up-to-go (p = 0.54; I = 0%), and short physical performance battery (p = 0.32; I = 98%) between exercise and control groups.
This meta-analysis suggests that unsupervised home-based exercise programmes have little impact on lower extremity functions in older adults. This review is limited by the small number of included studies, sample sizes, and high heterogeneity. There is a need to understand why this format lacks efficacy, and design more beneficial home-based exercise programmes.
衰老会导致身体机能下降,这可能影响独立生活能力并增加健康风险,从而加大对医疗资源的需求。对于一个似乎对休闲环境中的力量和平衡训练有抵触情绪的人群而言,找到经济实惠且易于开展的锻炼方式来改善身体机能很有必要。本综述旨在评估无监督的居家锻炼是否能改善老年人的下肢功能。
我们通过英文和中文数据库系统检索了调查无监督的居家锻炼对老年人身体机能影响的随机对照试验(RCT)和整群RCT。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估研究的方法学质量。对下肢功能结局进行荟萃分析。
在检索到的6791篇文章中,纳入了10项英文研究(907名参与者),8项研究(839名参与者)用于最终的荟萃分析,没有中文研究。研究主要来自欧洲,大多存在中度偏倚风险。大多数干预措施为多组分,每次持续10 - 40分钟,每周3次。荟萃分析显示,运动组和对照组在5次坐立试验(p = 0.05;I² = 0%)、最大膝关节伸展力量(p = 0.61;I² = 71%)、10米最大步行速度(p = 0.22;I² = 30%)、计时起立行走试验(p = 0.54;I² = 0%)和简短体能测试(p = 0.32;I² = 98%)方面无统计学显著差异。
这项荟萃分析表明,无监督的居家锻炼计划对老年人的下肢功能影响不大。本综述受到纳入研究数量少、样本量小以及异质性高的限制。有必要了解这种形式缺乏效果的原因,并设计更有益的居家锻炼计划。