Suppr超能文献

即时超声影像质量评估工具(POCUS IQ 量表)的研发与验证

Development and Validation of a Point-of-Care-Ultrasound Image Quality Assessment Tool: The POCUS IQ Scale.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Columbia University Vagelos College of Physicians & Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.

University of Louisville, Department of Pediatrics, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2023 Jan;42(1):135-145. doi: 10.1002/jum.16095. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to develop a standardized scoring tool to measure point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) image quality and to determine validity evidence for its use to assess lung ultrasound image quality.

METHODS

The POCUS Image Quality (POCUS IQ) scale was developed by POCUS-trained physicians to assess sonographers' image acquisition skills by evaluating image quality for any POCUS application. The scale was piloted using lung images of healthy standardized patients acquired by three expert sonographers compared to three novices before and after training. All images (experts, novices pre-training, novices post-training) were scored on the POCUS IQ scale by three blinded POCUS-trained physicians. Reliability was assessed with fully-crossed generalizability and decision studies. Validity was assessed using Messick's framework.

RESULTS

Content validity was supported by the tool's development process of literature review, expert consensus, and pilot testing. Response process was supported by reviewer training and the blinded scoring process. Relation to other variables was supported by scores relating to sonographer experience: median expert score = 10.5/14 (IQR: 4), median novice pre-training score = 6/14 (IQR: 2.25), and novices' improvement after training (median post-training score = 12/14, IQR: 3.25). Internal structure was supported by internal consistency data (coefficient alpha = 0.84, omega coefficient = 0.91) and the generalizability study showing the main contributor to score variability was the sonographer (51%). The G-coefficient was 0.89, suggesting very good internal structure, however, Gwet's AC  was 0.5, indicating moderate interrater reliability. The D study projected a minimum of 1 reviewer and 2 patients are needed for good psychometric reliability.

CONCLUSIONS

The POCUS scale has good preliminary validity evidence as an assessment tool for lung POCUS image acquisition skills. Further studies are needed to demonstrate its utility for other POCUS applications and as a feedback tool for POCUS learners.

摘要

目的

我们旨在开发一种标准化的评分工具,以测量即时超声(POCUS)图像质量,并确定其用于评估肺部超声图像质量的有效性证据。

方法

POCUS 图像质量(POCUS IQ)量表由接受过 POCUS 培训的医生开发,用于通过评估任何 POCUS 应用程序的图像质量来评估超声技师的图像采集技能。该量表在三名专家超声医师对健康标准化患者的肺部图像进行采集后进行了试点,然后在培训前后与三名新手进行了比较。所有图像(专家、新手培训前、新手培训后)均由三名接受过 POCUS 培训的医生根据 POCUS IQ 量表进行评分。使用完全交叉可概括性和决策研究评估可靠性。使用 Messick 的框架评估有效性。

结果

内容有效性得到了工具开发过程中的文献回顾、专家共识和试点测试的支持。反应过程得到了评审员培训和盲法评分过程的支持。与其他变量的关系得到了与超声医师经验相关的评分的支持:专家中位数评分为 10.5/14(IQR:4),新手培训前中位数评分为 6/14(IQR:2.25),培训后新手的提高(中位数培训后评分为 12/14,IQR:3.25)。内部结构得到了内部一致性数据(系数 alpha=0.84,omega 系数=0.91)和可概括性研究的支持,该研究表明评分变化的主要贡献者是超声医师(51%)。G 系数为 0.89,表明内部结构非常好,然而,Gwet 的 AC 为 0.5,表明评分者间的可靠性中等。D 研究预测,要获得良好的心理测量可靠性,至少需要 1 名评审员和 2 名患者。

结论

POCUS 量表作为肺部 POCUS 图像采集技能评估工具具有良好的初步有效性证据。需要进一步的研究来证明其在其他 POCUS 应用中的实用性以及作为 POCUS 学习者的反馈工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验