Suppr超能文献

急诊科单纯脓性皮肤和软组织感染患者的抗生素处方和结局。

Antibiotic prescribing and outcomes for patients with uncomplicated purulent skin and soft tissue infections in the emergency department.

机构信息

Schwartz/Reisman Emergency Medicine Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):719-724. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00366-1. Epub 2022 Sep 27.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Current guidelines suggest adjuvant antibiotics after incision and drainage (I&D) of small, uncomplicated abscesses may improve patient outcomes, minimize pain, and prevent recurrence. The objective was to explore antibiotic prescribing at ED discharge and describe patient outcomes.

METHODS

This was a health records review of adult patients (≥ 18 years) discharged from an academic hospital ED (annual census 65,000) over a 2-year period with diagnosis of an uncomplicated skin abscess. Outcomes included any unplanned return ED visits within 30 days, repeat I&D, and escalation to intravenous (IV) antibiotics.

RESULTS

Of 389 ED visits, 85.6% patients underwent I&D, of which 62.2% were prescribed antibiotics at discharge. Of these patients, 36.7% received guideline recommended antibiotics (TMP-SMX or clindamycin). Of all patients who underwent I&D, 13.2% had an unplanned return ED visit within 30 days, 6.9% required repeat I&D, and 0.6% patients were escalated to IV antibiotics. Patients treated with cefalexin were more likely to have an unplanned return ED visit within 30 days (20.0 vs 5.3%; Δ14.7, 95% CI 4.6-24.4), and were more likely to have a repeat I&D within 30 days (13.7 vs 0%; Δ13.7, 95% CI 6.4-22.0), compared to patients prescribed guideline recommended antibiotics. Treatment with guideline recommended antibiotics reduced treatment failure significantly in MRSA positive patients (0.0 vs 44.4%; Δ44.4, 95% CI 13.4-73.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotics were prescribed for most abscesses that underwent I&D. Less than half of the patients received antibiotics that were guideline recommended. Compared to those who received cefalexin, patients prescribed TMP-SMX or clindamycin had fewer return ED visits and were less likely to have a repeat I&D within 30 days. However, adjuvant antibiotic use did not significantly improve outcomes overall, with most patients not requiring a change in management irrespective of antibiotic use.

摘要

简介

目前的指南建议,对小而简单的脓肿进行切开引流(I&D)后使用辅助抗生素可以改善患者的预后,减轻疼痛并预防复发。目的是探讨急诊科(ED)出院时的抗生素开具情况,并描述患者的结局。

方法

这是一项对 2 年内在学术医院 ED 就诊(每年普查 65000 人)且诊断为单纯皮肤脓肿的成年患者(≥18 岁)的病历回顾性研究。结果包括 30 天内有无计划的再次 ED 就诊、再次 I&D 和升级为静脉(IV)抗生素。

结果

在 389 次 ED 就诊中,85.6%的患者接受了 I&D,其中 62.2%的患者在出院时开具了抗生素。在这些患者中,36.7%的患者接受了指南推荐的抗生素(复方磺胺甲噁唑或克林霉素)。所有接受 I&D 的患者中,13.2%在 30 天内有无计划的再次 ED 就诊,6.9%需要再次 I&D,0.6%的患者升级为 IV 抗生素。使用头孢氨苄的患者在 30 天内再次 ED 就诊的可能性更高(20.0%比 5.3%;Δ14.7,95%CI 4.6-24.4),在 30 天内再次接受 I&D 的可能性也更高(13.7%比 0%;Δ13.7,95%CI 6.4-22.0),与接受指南推荐抗生素的患者相比。在 MRSA 阳性患者中,使用指南推荐的抗生素可显著降低治疗失败率(0.0%比 44.4%;Δ44.4,95%CI 13.4-73.3)。

结论

大多数接受 I&D 的脓肿患者都开具了抗生素。不到一半的患者接受了指南推荐的抗生素。与使用头孢氨苄的患者相比,使用复方磺胺甲噁唑或克林霉素的患者在 30 天内再次 ED 就诊的次数更少,再次 I&D 的可能性也更小。然而,辅助抗生素的使用并不能显著改善整体结局,大多数患者无论是否使用抗生素,都不需要改变治疗方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验