Penner Francesca, Cano Kiana, McGill Charles, Vanwoerden Salome, Sharp Carla
Yale Child Study Center, Yale University, 230 S. Frontage Rd, 06520, New Haven, CT, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA.
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2024 Jun;55(3):705-718. doi: 10.1007/s10578-022-01438-0. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
The Inadequate Boundaries Questionnaire (IBQ) was created as a multi-dimensional measure of boundary violations in parent-child relationships. Use of the IBQ has been increasing; however, its psychometric properties, including its proposed five-factor structure, have yet to be comprehensively evaluated. The current study examined the factor structure, reliability, mother-adolescent agreement, and convergent and discriminant validity of the IBQ-Parent and -Youth English versions among community and clinical adolescents and their mothers. Confirmatory factor analysis most strongly supported four factors: Guilt Induction-Psychological Control, Parentification, No Boundaries (Enmeshment), and Triangulation. The scales showed acceptable to excellent reliability. Mother-adolescent agreement was moderate in the healthy community sample and weaker in the clinical sample. Convergent and discriminant associations supported the validity of the Guilt Induction-Psychological Control scale, with a more complex picture emerging for other scales. Implications of these findings and directions for future research with the IBQ are discussed.
不适当边界问卷(IBQ)是作为一种对亲子关系中边界侵犯的多维测量工具而创建的。IBQ的使用一直在增加;然而,其心理测量特性,包括其提议的五因素结构,尚未得到全面评估。本研究考察了社区和临床青少年及其母亲中IBQ-父母版和-青少年英文版的因素结构、信度、母子一致性以及聚合效度和区分效度。验证性因素分析最有力地支持了四个因素:内疚诱导-心理控制、亲职化、无边界(情感融合)和三角关系。各量表显示出可接受至优秀的信度。在健康社区样本中,母子一致性中等,在临床样本中则较弱。聚合和区分关联支持了内疚诱导-心理控制量表的效度,而其他量表则呈现出更为复杂的情况。讨论了这些发现的意义以及未来使用IBQ进行研究的方向。