Department of Environmental Science, Radboud Institute for Biological and Environmental Sciences (RIBES), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Dec;28(24):7217-7233. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16450. Epub 2022 Oct 10.
While linear infrastructures, such as roads and power lines, are vital to human development, they may also have negative impacts on wildlife populations up to several kilometres into the surrounding environment (infrastructure-effect zones, IEZs). However, species-specific IEZs are not available for the vast majority of species, hampering global assessments of infrastructure impacts on wildlife. Here, we synthesized 253 studies worldwide to quantify the magnitude and spatial extent of infrastructure impacts on the abundance of 792 vertebrate species. We also identified the extent to which species traits, infrastructure type and habitat modulate IEZs for vertebrate species. Our results reveal contrasting responses across taxa based on the local context and species traits. Carnivorous mammals were generally more abundant in the proximity of infrastructure. In turn, medium- to large-sized non-carnivorous mammals (>1 kg) were less abundant near infrastructure across habitats, while their smaller counterparts were more abundant close to infrastructure in open habitats. Bird abundance was reduced near infrastructure with larger IEZs for non-carnivorous than for carnivorous species. Furthermore, birds experienced larger IEZs in closed (carnivores: ≈130 m, non-carnivores: >1 km) compared to open habitats (carnivores: ≈70 m, non-carnivores: ≈470 m). Reptiles were more abundant near infrastructure in closed habitats but not in open habitats where abundances were reduced within an IEZ of ≈90 m. Finally, IEZs were relatively small in amphibians (<30 m). These results indicate that infrastructure impact assessments should differentiate IEZs across species and local contexts in order to capture the variety of responses to infrastructure. Our trait-based synthetic approach can be applied in large-scale assessments of the impacts of current and future infrastructure developments across multiple species, including those for which infrastructure responses are not known from empirical data.
虽然线性基础设施(如道路和输电线)对人类发展至关重要,但它们也可能对周围环境中多达数公里范围内的野生动物种群产生负面影响(基础设施影响区,IEZ)。然而,对于绝大多数物种来说,还没有特定于物种的 IEZ,这阻碍了对基础设施对野生动物影响的全球评估。在这里,我们综合了全球 253 项研究,以量化基础设施对 792 种脊椎动物物种丰富度的影响的幅度和空间范围。我们还确定了物种特征、基础设施类型和栖息地在多大程度上调节了脊椎动物物种的 IEZ。我们的研究结果揭示了基于当地背景和物种特征的不同分类群的对比反应。肉食性哺乳动物通常在靠近基础设施的地方更为丰富。反过来,中等到大型非肉食性哺乳动物(>1 公斤)在各种栖息地中靠近基础设施的地方较少,而它们较小的同类在开阔栖息地靠近基础设施的地方更为丰富。在非肉食性物种中,靠近基础设施的鸟类的数量减少了,而在肉食性物种中,IEZ 较大。此外,在封闭(肉食性:≈130 米,非肉食性:>1 公里)而非开放栖息地(肉食性:≈70 米,非肉食性:≈470 米)中,鸟类的 IEZ 更大。在封闭栖息地中,爬行动物靠近基础设施更为丰富,但在开阔栖息地中则不然,IEZ 内的数量减少了约 90 米。最后,两栖动物的 IEZ 相对较小(<30 米)。这些结果表明,基础设施影响评估应区分不同物种和当地背景下的 IEZ,以捕捉到对基础设施的各种反应。我们基于特征的综合方法可应用于对多种物种的当前和未来基础设施发展的影响进行大规模评估,包括那些没有从经验数据中得知基础设施反应的物种。