Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 8-2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia; FSBSI "Institute of General Pathology and Pathophysiology", 8, Baltiyskaya st., Moscow 125315, Russia.
Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Sechenov University, 8-2, Trubetskaya St., Moscow 119991, Russia.
Acta Biomater. 2023 Jul 15;165:140-152. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2022.09.051. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Cell transitions between the epithelial and mesenchymal phenotypes provide the regulated morphogenesis and regeneration throughout the ontogenesis. The tissue mechanics and mechanotransduction play an essential role in these processes. Cell spheroids reproduce the cell density of native tissues and represent simple building blocks for the tissue engineering purposes. The mechanical properties of mesenchymal and epithelial cells have been extensively studied in 2D monolayer cultures, but have not been sufficiently compared in spheroids. Here, we have simultaneously applied several techniques to assess the mechanical parameters of such spheroids. The local surface mechanical properties were measured by AFM, and the bulk properties were analyzed with parallel-plate compression, as well as by observing cut opening after microdissection. The comparison of the collected data allowed us to apply the model of a solid body with surface tension, and estimate the parameters of this model. We found an expectedly higher surface tension in mesenchymal spheroids, as well as a higher bulk modulus and relaxation time. The two latter parameters agree with the bulk poroelastic behavior of spheroids, and with the higher cell density and extracellular matrix content in mesenchymal spheroids. The higher tension of the surface layer cells in mesenchymal cell spheroids was also confirmed by the viscoelastic AFM characterization. The cell phenotype affected the self-organization during the spheroid formation, as well as the structure, biomechanical properties, and spreading of spheroids. The obtained results will contribute to a more detailed description of spheroid and tissue biomechanics, and will help in controlling the tissue regeneration and morphogenesis. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Spheroids are widely used as building blocks for scaffold-based and scaffold-free strategies in tissue engineering. In most studies, either the concept of a solid body or a liquid with surface tension was used to describe the biomechanical behavior of spheroids. Here, we have used a model which combines both aspects, a solid body with surface tension. The "solid" aspect was described as a visco-poroelastic material, affected by the liquid redistribution through the cells and ECM at the scale of the whole spheroid. A higher surface tension was found for mesenchymal spheroids than that for epithelial spheroids, observed as a higher stiffness of the spheroid surface, as well as a larger spontaneous opening of the cut edges after microdissection.
细胞在上皮和间充质表型之间的转变为整个个体发生过程中的调节形态发生和再生提供了基础。组织力学和力学转导在这些过程中起着至关重要的作用。细胞球体再现了天然组织的细胞密度,并代表了组织工程的简单构建块。在 2D 单层培养物中已经广泛研究了间充质和上皮细胞的机械性能,但在球体中尚未得到充分比较。在这里,我们同时应用了几种技术来评估此类球体的机械参数。通过原子力显微镜(AFM)测量局部表面力学性能,通过平行板压缩以及通过微切割后观察开口来分析整体性能。收集的数据的比较使我们能够应用具有表面张力的实心体模型,并估计该模型的参数。我们发现间充质球体的表面张力预计会更高,并且体模量和弛豫时间更高。后两个参数与球体的整体多孔弹性行为以及间充质球体中更高的细胞密度和细胞外基质含量一致。通过粘弹性 AFM 特性也证实了间充质细胞球体中表面层细胞的更高张力。细胞表型影响球体形成过程中的自组织,以及球体的结构、生物力学特性和扩展。获得的结果将有助于更详细地描述球体和组织生物力学,并有助于控制组织再生和形态发生。 意义声明:球体被广泛用作组织工程中基于支架和无支架策略的构建块。在大多数研究中,要么使用实心体的概念,要么使用具有表面张力的液体来描述球体的生物力学行为。在这里,我们使用了一种结合了这两个方面的模型,即具有表面张力的实心体。“固体”方面被描述为粘弹性多孔弹性材料,受整个球体范围内通过细胞和 ECM 重新分配的液体的影响。与上皮球体相比,间充质球体的表面张力更高,表现为球体表面的刚性更高,以及微切割后切割边缘的自发开口更大。