Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Transplant Cell Ther. 2022 Dec;28(12):831.e1-831.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2022.09.012. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
Contemporary, prospective data regarding the impact of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) on outcomes after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Auto-HSCT) in an era when stem cell grafts are more qualitatively robust are limited. Recent retrospective analyses have not supported a beneficial effect of post-transplantation G-CSF use on major outcomes after Auto-HSCT leading to strategies to delay or eliminate the use of G-CSF altogether in this context. To test the hypothesis that the infusion of consistently higher doses of stem cells (defined as ≥4 × 10/kg) in Auto-HSCT will obviate the need for post-transplantation G-CSF. If so, the impact of withholding G-CSF will be noninferior to the use of G-CSF in terms of length of stay (LOS). The specific objectives were to conduct a prospective, randomized clinical trial primarily examining the impact of post-transplantation G-CSF on LOS, and secondarily on engraftment, infectious complications, antibiotic usage, and incidence of engraftment syndrome after Auto-HSCT in patients receiving versus not receiving G-CSF after Auto-HSCT. Patients with multiple myeloma or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who underwent Pegfilgrastim plus Plerixafor-primed stem cell collection followed by Auto-HSCT were randomized to the G-CSF group (receive G-CSF starting at day 3 after Auto-HSCT) or the no G-CSF group (G-CSF withheld after Auto-HSCT). Seventy patients per arm were planned to demonstrate the primary endpoint of noninferiority in LOS between the G-CSF and the no G-CSF groups. Patient outcomes in the two groups were followed up and compared after Auto-HSCT, and an interim analysis for futility was planned when accrual reached 50%.The primary finding of this study was that despite only a 2-day longer median absolute neutrophil count (ANC) recovery in the no G-CSF arm (median 11 versus 13 days; P = .001), LOS was 4 days longer in patients not treated with G-CSF (median 11 days versus 15 days; P = .001). G-CSF use was associated with more robust incremental daily increases in ANC once recovered (P = .001), fewer days of febrile neutropenia (P = .001), and fewer days on antibiotics (P = .001), potentially contributing to this disproportionate finding. Inferiority in LOS in the no G-CSF group was demonstrated on the interim analysis, and the study was closed at the half-way point. There were no significant group differences in platelet recovery, documented infections, hospital readmissions, or overall survival at 1 year. Engraftment syndrome occurred in 54.3% of patients and was not related to G-CSF use. These results suggest that the increased LOS associated with the omission of G-CSF is largely due to concerns regarding the potential for infection in patients without a stable, recovered ANC in a hospital setting. Engraftment syndrome represented a significant source of febrile neutropenia further contributing to patient safety concerns and requires strategies to decrease its incidence. Infectious complications and death were not affected by the omission of G-CSF supporting a carefully monitored outpatient approach to Auto-HSCT in which white blood cell growth factor is eliminated or given as needed for documented infection. © 2023 American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
当代,关于粒细胞集落刺激因子 (G-CSF) 在自体造血干细胞移植 (Auto-HSCT) 时代对移植后结局影响的前瞻性数据有限,在此时代,干细胞移植物的质量更稳健。最近的回顾性分析不支持移植后使用 G-CSF 对 Auto-HSCT 后主要结局有有益影响,这导致在这种情况下延迟或完全消除 G-CSF 使用的策略。为了检验输注一致更高剂量干细胞(定义为≥4×10/kg)是否会消除移植后使用 G-CSF 的必要性。如果是这样,那么在 Auto-HSCT 后,不使用 G-CSF 的影响在住院时间(LOS)方面不劣于使用 G-CSF。具体目标是进行一项前瞻性、随机临床试验,主要研究移植后 G-CSF 对 LOS 的影响,其次是对植入、感染并发症、抗生素使用以及 Auto-HSCT 后植入综合征发生率的影响,这些是在接受 Auto-HSCT 后接受或不接受 G-CSF 的患者中观察到的。接受培非格司亭联合普乐沙福动员的多发性骨髓瘤或非霍奇金淋巴瘤 (NHL) 患者进行干细胞采集,随后进行 Auto-HSCT,随机分为 G-CSF 组(在 Auto-HSCT 后第 3 天开始使用 G-CSF)或无 G-CSF 组(Auto-HSCT 后不使用 G-CSF)。计划每组 70 例患者,以证明 G-CSF 组和无 G-CSF 组在 LOS 方面非劣效性的主要终点。Auto-HSCT 后随访和比较两组患者的结局,并计划在达到 50%入组时进行无效性的中期分析。这项研究的主要发现是,尽管无 G-CSF 组的绝对中性粒细胞计数 (ANC) 恢复中位数仅延长 2 天(中位数 11 天与 13 天;P=0.001),但未接受 G-CSF 治疗的患者 LOS 延长 4 天(中位数 11 天与 15 天;P=0.001)。G-CSF 使用后,ANC 恢复后每天的增量增加更明显(P=0.001),发热性中性粒细胞减少症的天数减少(P=0.001),抗生素使用的天数减少(P=0.001),这可能导致了这种不成比例的发现。无 G-CSF 组的 LOS 非劣效性在中期分析中得到证实,研究在中途停止。在 1 年时,血小板恢复、有记录的感染、医院再入院或总生存率没有显著的组间差异。植入综合征发生在 54.3%的患者中,与 G-CSF 使用无关。这些结果表明,与不使用 G-CSF 相关的 LOS 延长主要是由于担心在医院环境中 ANC 稳定恢复的患者存在感染的可能性。植入综合征是发热性中性粒细胞减少症的一个重要来源,进一步导致对患者安全的担忧,需要采取策略降低其发生率。感染并发症和死亡不受 G-CSF 缺失的影响,支持在 Auto-HSCT 中采用精心监测的门诊方法,消除或按需使用白细胞生长因子治疗有记录的感染。