Suppr超能文献

在口腔前牙修复中,有机硅烷单体改性复合树脂与甲基丙烯酸酯基复合树脂的颜色稳定性和表面粗糙度比较。

Color stability and surface roughness of ormocer- versus methacrylate-based single shade composite in anterior restoration.

机构信息

Operative Dentistry Department, Faculty of Dentistry, Algomhoria Street, Po (box) 35516, Mansoura, Aldakhlia, Egypt.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 27;22(1):430. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02423-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The blending ability of universal shade composites and their stability in the oral environment are of great concern in restoring anterior teeth. This study aims to evaluate and compare the color stability and surface roughness of two single-shade composite restorations, ormocer-based composite (OBC) and methacrylate resin-based composite (RBC), after storing them in different staining media.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this study, two universal shade composite restorative materials were tested: a nanohybrid OBC (Admira fusion X-tra, Voco) and a supra-nanofilled RBC (Omnichroma, Toukyama). In total, 60 cylindrical centralized cavities (diameter: 5 mm, depth: 2 mm) were prepared in sound extracted-human central incisors and divided into two equal groups according to the restorative material used (n = 30). According to the storage media, the teeth of each group were divided into three subgroups (n = 10): artificial saliva, black tea, and cola. The restoration color was evaluated for all teeth at baseline and after four weeks of storage. The color stability (∆E) was measured using a reflective spectrophotometer (X-Rite, model RM200QC, Neu-Isenburg, Germany). The surface roughness (Ra) was evaluated using three-dimensional optical profilometry (Wyko, Model NT 1100, Veeco, Tucson, USA). Additionally, the extracted data were analyzed using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), one-way ANOVA and Student's t-test.

RESULTS

In the baseline evaluation, there were no statistically significant differences with respect to color matching or surface roughness results between the two studied restorative materials. However, the differences were statistically significant after storing them in different media.

CONCLUSION

Universal composites showed satisfactory color matching with different teeth colors and accepted surface smoothness, whereas the aging procedure exerted a negative effect on their color stability and surface characteristics.

摘要

背景

在修复前牙时,通用遮色复合树脂的混合能力及其在口腔环境中的稳定性备受关注。本研究旨在评估和比较两种单遮色复合树脂修复材料,即基于有机硅烷的复合树脂(OBC)和甲基丙烯酸树脂基复合树脂(RBC),在储存于不同染色介质后的颜色稳定性和表面粗糙度。

材料与方法

本研究测试了两种通用遮色复合修复材料:纳米复合 OBC(Admira fusion X-tra,Voco)和超纳米填充 RBC(Omnichroma,Toukyama)。总共在健康拔出的人上颌中切牙上制备了 60 个圆柱形中心化腔(直径:5mm,深度:2mm),并根据使用的修复材料将其分为两组(n=30)。根据储存介质,每组牙齿又分为三个亚组(n=10):人工唾液、红茶和可乐。所有牙齿均在基线和储存 4 周后评估修复体的颜色。使用反射分光光度计(X-Rite,型号 RM200QC,Neu-Isenburg,德国)测量颜色稳定性(∆E)。使用三维光学轮廓仪(Wyko,型号 NT 1100,Veeco,Tucson,USA)评估表面粗糙度(Ra)。此外,使用双向方差分析(ANOVA)、单向方差分析和学生 t 检验对提取的数据进行分析。

结果

在基线评估中,两种研究修复材料的颜色匹配或表面粗糙度结果之间没有统计学上的显著差异。然而,在将它们储存在不同的介质中后,差异具有统计学意义。

结论

通用复合材料与不同的牙齿颜色具有令人满意的颜色匹配和可接受的表面光滑度,而老化过程对其颜色稳定性和表面特性产生了负面影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8343/9513900/44340098ed29/12903_2022_2423_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验