Suppr超能文献

经过多次修整和抛光程序后,纳米填充复合树脂、纳米混合复合树脂以及基于有机陶瓷的牙齿颜色修复材料的表面粗糙度。

Surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composite resin and ormocer-based tooth-colored restorative materials after several finishing and polishing procedures.

作者信息

Başeren Meserret

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hacettepe University, S|hh|ye 06100, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

J Biomater Appl. 2004 Oct;19(2):121-34. doi: 10.1177/0885328204044011.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of several finishing and polishing procedures on the surface roughness of nanofill and nanohybrid composites and ormocer-based dental restorative materials. The materials included a nanofill composite (Supreme); a nanohybrid composite (Grandio); and an ormocer (organically modified ceramic) (Admira). Forty specimens of each material were prepared using a Mylar strip (polyester strip) and randomly divided into four finishing and polishing groups (n =10): (I) Diamond bur/Super-snap Rainbow Technique Kit(Al(2)O(2)-coated, graded abrasive discs); (II) Diamond bur/Astropol and Astrobrush system (silicone abrasive polishers and brush system); (III) Tungsten carbide bur/Super-snap Rainbow Technique Kit; and (IV) Tungsten carbide bur/Astropol and Astro-brush system. The average surface roughness (Ra) in micrometers was measured using a "Mahr Perthometer S4P" Surface Roughness Tester and the data were compared using ANOVA at P <or=0.05. The results of this study indicated that the Mylar strip produced the smoothest surface on all materials and among the finishing-polishing methods the first and the third methods performed significantly smoother surfaces than the second and the fourth methods for the three restoratives. Ormocer (Admira) performed the lowest variability in initial surface roughness among the tested materials. This study has shown that Super-snap abrasive discs produced a smoother surface than the Astropol and Astrobrush silicone polishers for composite and ormocer-based restorative materials, but the results would be valid clinically for readily accessible and flat surfaces i.e., not for all areas in the mouth. Therefore silicone polishers are necessary for posterior areas and for concave and convex surfaces.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估几种修整和抛光程序对纳米填充和纳米混合复合材料以及基于有机陶瓷的牙科修复材料表面粗糙度的影响。材料包括一种纳米填充复合材料(Supreme)、一种纳米混合复合材料(Grandio)和一种有机陶瓷(有机改性陶瓷)(Admira)。每种材料制备40个样本,使用聚酯薄膜条(聚酯条)制作,并随机分为四个修整和抛光组(n = 10):(I)金刚石车针/Super-snap彩虹技术套件(氧化铝涂层分级研磨盘);(II)金刚石车针/Astropol和Astrobrush系统(硅树脂研磨抛光器和刷系统);(III)碳化钨车针/Super-snap彩虹技术套件;以及(IV)碳化钨车针/Astropol和Astrobrush系统。使用“马尔表面粗糙度仪S4P”测量以微米为单位的平均表面粗糙度(Ra),并使用方差分析在P≤0.05时比较数据。本研究结果表明,聚酯薄膜条在所有材料上产生的表面最光滑,在修整-抛光方法中,对于三种修复材料,第一种和第三种方法产生的表面比第二种和第四种方法明显更光滑。在测试材料中,有机陶瓷(Admira)在初始表面粗糙度方面的变化最小。本研究表明,对于基于复合材料和有机陶瓷的修复材料,Super-snap研磨盘比Astropol和Astrobrush硅树脂抛光器产生的表面更光滑,但该结果在临床上仅适用于易于触及的平坦表面,即不适用于口腔中的所有区域。因此,硅树脂抛光器对于后牙区域以及凹凸表面是必要的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验