Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Hebrew SeniorLife, Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA, USA.
J Bone Miner Res. 2022 Nov;37(11):2103-2111. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.4693. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
Frailty is common in older adults with fractures. Osteoporosis medications reduce subsequent fracture, but limited data exist on medication efficacy in frail individuals. Our objective was to determine whether medications reduce the risk of subsequent fracture in frail, older adults. A retrospective cohort of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries was conducted (2014-2016). We included adults aged ≥65 years who were hospitalized with fractures without osteoporosis treatment. Pre-fracture frailty was defined using claims-based frailty index (≥0.2 = frail). Exposure to any osteoporosis treatment (oral or intravenous bisphosphonates, denosumab, and teriparatide) was ascertained using Part B and D claims and categorized according to the cumulative duration of exposure: none, 1-90 days, and >90 days. Subsequent fractures were ascertained from Part A or B claims. Cause-specific hazard models with time-varying exposure were fit to examine the association between treatment and fracture outcomes, controlling for relevant covariates. Among 29,904 patients hospitalized with fractures, 15,345 (51.3%) were frail, and 2148 (7.2%) received osteoporosis treatment (median treatment duration 183.0 days). Patients who received treatment were younger (80.2 versus 82.2 years), female (86.5% versus 73.0%), and less frail (0.20 versus 0.22) than patients without treatment. During follow-up, 5079 (17.0%) patients experienced a subsequent fracture. Treatment with osteoporosis medications for >90 days compared with no treatment reduced the risk of fracture (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68-1.00) overall. Results were similar in frail (HR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.65-1.12) and non-frail (HR = 0.80; 95% CI 0.61-1.04) patients but not significant. In conclusion, osteoporosis treatment >90 days was associated with similar trends in reduced risk of subsequent fracture in frail and non-frail persons. Treatment rates were very low, particularly among the frail. When weighing treatment options in frail older adults with hospitalized fractures, clinicians should be aware that drug therapy does not appear to lose its efficacy. © 2022 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).
衰弱在伴有骨折的老年患者中很常见。骨质疏松症药物可降低随后发生的骨折风险,但关于衰弱个体药物疗效的数据有限。我们的目的是确定药物是否可降低伴有骨折的衰弱老年患者发生随后骨折的风险。对 Medicare 按服务项目付费受益人的回顾性队列进行了研究(2014-2016 年)。纳入了因无骨质疏松症治疗而住院治疗骨折的年龄≥65 岁的成年人。骨折前衰弱状态使用基于索赔的衰弱指数(≥0.2=衰弱)定义。使用 B 部分和 D 部分索赔确定任何骨质疏松症治疗(口服或静脉用双膦酸盐、地舒单抗和特立帕肽)的暴露情况,并根据暴露时间的长短进行分类:无、1-90 天和>90 天。从 A 部分或 B 部分索赔确定随后发生的骨折。使用具有时变暴露的特定原因风险模型,在控制相关协变量的情况下,检查治疗与骨折结局之间的关联。在因骨折住院治疗的 29904 名患者中,15345 名(51.3%)患者衰弱,2148 名(7.2%)患者接受了骨质疏松症治疗(中位治疗持续时间为 183.0 天)。接受治疗的患者更年轻(80.2 岁 vs. 82.2 岁)、女性(86.5% vs. 73.0%)和衰弱程度较轻(0.20 vs. 0.22)。在随访期间,5079 名(17.0%)患者发生了随后的骨折。与未治疗相比,骨质疏松症药物治疗>90 天可降低骨折风险(风险比[HR] 0.82;95%置信区间[CI] 0.68-1.00)。在衰弱(HR 0.85;95%CI 0.65-1.12)和非衰弱(HR 0.80;95%CI 0.61-1.04)患者中,结果相似,但无统计学意义。总之,在衰弱和非衰弱人群中,骨质疏松症治疗>90 天与降低随后骨折风险的趋势相似。治疗率非常低,尤其是在衰弱患者中。当权衡伴有骨折的衰弱老年患者的治疗选择时,临床医生应注意,药物治疗似乎并未丧失其疗效。