Department of Medicine Cardiovascular Division Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA.
Richard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Boston MA.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 5;10(19):e022150. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022150. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
Background In aortic valve disease, the relationship between claims-based frailty indices (CFIs) and validated measures of frailty constructed from in-person assessments is unclear but may be relevant for retrospective ascertainment of frailty status when otherwise unmeasured. Methods and Results We linked adults aged ≥65 years in the US CoreValve Studies (linkage rate, 67%; mean age, 82.7±6.2 years, 43.1% women), to Medicare inpatient claims, 2011 to 2015. The Johns Hopkins CFI, validated on the basis of the Fried index, was generated for each study participant, and the association between CFI tertile and trial outcomes was evaluated as part of the EXTEND-FRAILTY substudy. Among 2357 participants (64.9% frail), higher CFI tertile was associated with greater impairments in nutrition, disability, cognition, and self-rated health. The primary outcome of all-cause mortality at 1 year occurred in 19.3%, 23.1%, and 31.3% of those in tertiles 1 to 3, respectively (tertile 2 versus 1: hazard ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.98-1.51; =0.07; tertile 3 versus 1: hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.41-2.12; <0.001). Secondary outcomes (bleeding, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, and hospitalization) were more frequent with increasing CFI tertile and persisted despite adjustment for age, sex, New York Heart Association class, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score. Conclusions In linked Medicare and CoreValve study data, a CFI based on the Fried index consistently identified individuals with worse impairments in frailty, disability, cognitive dysfunction, and nutrition and a higher risk of death, hospitalization, bleeding, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, independent of age and risk category. While not a surrogate for validated metrics of frailty using in-person assessments, use of this CFI to ascertain frailty status among patients with aortic valve disease may be valid and prognostically relevant information when otherwise not measured.
在主动脉瓣疾病中,基于索赔的衰弱指数(CFI)与通过面对面评估构建的经过验证的衰弱测量之间的关系尚不清楚,但在其他情况下无法测量时,对于回顾性确定衰弱状态可能具有重要意义。
我们将美国 CoreValve 研究中的年龄≥65 岁的成年人(链接率为 67%;平均年龄为 82.7±6.2 岁,43.1%为女性)与 Medicare 住院记录进行链接,时间为 2011 年至 2015 年。针对 Fried 指数进行了验证的约翰霍普金斯 CFI 为每位研究参与者生成,并作为 EXTEND-FRAILTY 子研究的一部分评估了 CFI 三分位数与试验结局之间的关联。在 2357 名参与者(64.9%衰弱)中,较高的 CFI 三分位数与营养、残疾、认知和自我报告健康方面的更多损害相关。1 年时全因死亡率的主要结局在三分位数 1 到 3 的参与者中分别为 19.3%、23.1%和 31.3%(三分位数 2 与 1 相比:风险比,1.22;95%置信区间,0.98-1.51;=0.07;三分位数 3 与 1 相比:风险比,1.73;95%置信区间,1.41-2.12;<0.001)。次要结局(出血、主要不良心血管和脑血管事件以及住院)随着 CFI 三分位数的增加而更为频繁,即使在调整了年龄、性别、纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级和胸外科医生协会(STS)风险评分后,这一趋势仍然存在。
在链接的 Medicare 和 CoreValve 研究数据中,基于 Fried 指数的 CFI 一致地确定了在衰弱、残疾、认知功能障碍和营养方面受损更严重且死亡、住院、出血和主要不良心血管和脑血管事件风险更高的个体,这与年龄和风险类别无关。虽然该 CFI 不能替代通过面对面评估的经过验证的衰弱衡量标准,但在其他情况下无法测量时,使用该 CFI 来确定主动脉瓣疾病患者的衰弱状态可能是有效的且具有预后相关性的信息。