Suppr超能文献

评估新型β-内酰胺类/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合抗生素的临床疗效:一项系统文献综述和荟萃分析。

Evaluating the clinical effectiveness of new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination antibiotics: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Wilson Geneva M, Fitzpatrick Margaret A, Walding Kyle, Gonzalez Beverly, Schweizer Marin L, Suda Katie J, Evans Charlesnika T

机构信息

Center of Innovation for Complex Chronic Healthcare (CINCCH), Edward Hines Jr Veterans' Affairs (VA) Hospital, Hines, Illinois.

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2021 Nov 25;1(1):e53. doi: 10.1017/ash.2021.217. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ceftazidime/avibactam (C/A), ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), imipenem/relebactam (I/R), and meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) combine either a cephalosporin (C/T and C/A) or a carbapenem antibiotic (M/V and I/R) with a β-lactamase inhibitor. They are used to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and/or multidrug-resistant (MDRPA).

OBJECTIVE

We compared the pooled clinical success of these medications to older therapies.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE were searched from January 1, 2012, through September 2, 2020, for C/A, C/T, I/R, and M/V studies. The main outcome was clinical success, which was assessed using random-effects models. Stratified analyses were conducted for study drug, sample size, quality, infection source, study design, and multidrug-resistant gram-negative organism (MDRGNO) population. Microbiological success and 28- and 30-day mortality were assessed as secondary outcomes. Heterogeneity was determined using I values.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 articles met the inclusion criteria; 8 observational studies and 17 randomized control trials. We detected no difference in clinical success comparing new combination antibiotics with standard therapies for all included organisms (pooled OR, 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.51). We detected a moderate level of heterogeneity among the included studies I = 56%. Studies that focused on patients with CRE or MDRPA infections demonstrated a strong association between treatment with new combination antibiotics and clinical success (pooled OR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.60-3.57).

CONCLUSIONS

C/T, C/A, I/R, and M/V are not inferior to standard therapies for treating various complicated infections, but they may have greater clinical success for treating MDRPA and CRE infections. More studies that evaluate the use of these antibiotics for drug-resistant infections are needed to determine their effectiveness.

摘要

背景

头孢他啶/阿维巴坦(C/A)、头孢洛扎/他唑巴坦(C/T)、亚胺培南/瑞来巴坦(I/R)和美罗培南/瓦博巴坦(M/V)将头孢菌素(C/T和C/A)或碳青霉烯类抗生素(M/V和I/R)与β-内酰胺酶抑制剂联合使用。它们用于治疗耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科细菌(CRE)和/或多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌(MDRPA)。

目的

我们比较了这些药物与传统疗法的综合临床成功率。

方法

检索2012年1月1日至2020年9月2日期间的PubMed和EMBASE数据库,查找关于C/A、C/T、I/R和M/V的研究。主要结局为临床成功率,采用随机效应模型进行评估。对研究药物、样本量、质量、感染源、研究设计和多重耐药革兰阴性菌(MDRGNO)人群进行分层分析。微生物学成功率以及28天和30天死亡率作为次要结局进行评估。使用I值确定异质性。

结果

总体而言,25篇文章符合纳入标准;8项观察性研究和17项随机对照试验。对于所有纳入的病原体,我们发现新的联合抗生素与标准疗法在临床成功率方面无差异(合并OR,1.21;95%CI,0.96 - 1.51)。我们在纳入的研究中检测到中等程度的异质性(I = 56%)。专注于CRE或MDRPA感染患者的研究表明,新的联合抗生素治疗与临床成功率之间存在强关联(合并OR,2.20;95%CI,1.60 - 3.57)。

结论

C/T、C/A、I/R和M/V在治疗各种复杂感染方面并不劣于标准疗法,但在治疗MDRPA和CRE感染方面可能具有更高的临床成功率。需要更多评估这些抗生素用于耐药感染的研究来确定其有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7652/9495535/a029361c2872/S2732494X21002175_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验