Suppr超能文献

头孢他洛赞/他唑巴坦与多粘菌素或基于氨基糖苷类的方案治疗耐多药铜绿假单胞菌的比较

Ceftolozane/Tazobactam vs Polymyxin or Aminoglycoside-based Regimens for the Treatment of Drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

作者信息

Pogue Jason M, Kaye Keith S, Veve Michael P, Patel Twisha S, Gerlach Anthony T, Davis Susan L, Puzniak Laura A, File Tom M, Olson Shannon, Dhar Sorabh, Bonomo Robert A, Perez Federico

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2020 Jul 11;71(2):304-310. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz816.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination that often retains activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative safety and efficacy vs polymyxins or aminoglycosides in this setting remains unknown.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed. Patients who received ceftolozane/tazobactam were compared with those treated with either polymyxin or aminoglycoside-based regimens for infections due to drug-resistant P. aeruginosa. Multivariate logistic regression was performed controlling for factors associated with treatment to assess the independent impact of ceftolozane/tazobactam on clinical cure, acute kidney injury (AKI), and in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 200 patients were included (100 in each treatment arm). The cohort represented an ill population with 69% in the intensive care unit, 63% mechanically ventilated, and 42% in severe sepsis or septic shock at infection onset. The most common infection type was ventilator-associated pneumonia (52%); 7% of patients were bacteremic. Combination therapy was more commonly used in polymyxin/aminoglycoside patients than those who received ceftolozane/tazobactam (72% vs 15%, P < .001). After adjusting for differences between groups, receipt of ceftolozane/tazobactam was independently associated with clinical cure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-5.30) and protective against AKI (aOR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.22). There was no difference in in-hospital mortality. The number needed to treat for a clinical cure with ceftolozane/tazobactam was 5, and the number needed to harm with AKI with a polymyxin/aminoglycoside was 4.

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the preferential use of ceftolozane/tazobactam over polymyxins or aminoglycosides for drug-resistant P. aeruginosa infections.

摘要

背景

头孢他啶/阿维巴坦是一种新型头孢菌素/β-内酰胺酶抑制剂组合,通常对耐药铜绿假单胞菌仍具有活性。在这种情况下,与多粘菌素或氨基糖苷类药物相比,其相对安全性和疗效尚不清楚。

方法

进行了一项回顾性、多中心、观察性队列研究。将接受头孢他啶/阿维巴坦治疗的患者与接受基于多粘菌素或氨基糖苷类药物方案治疗耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染的患者进行比较。进行多变量逻辑回归,控制与治疗相关的因素,以评估头孢他啶/阿维巴坦对临床治愈、急性肾损伤(AKI)和住院死亡率的独立影响。

结果

共纳入200例患者(每个治疗组100例)。该队列代表了一个病情严重的人群,69%在重症监护病房,63%接受机械通气,42%在感染发作时处于严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克状态。最常见的感染类型是呼吸机相关性肺炎(52%);7%的患者发生菌血症。与接受头孢他啶/阿维巴坦的患者相比,多粘菌素/氨基糖苷类药物患者更常使用联合治疗(72%对15%,P <.001)。在调整组间差异后,接受头孢他啶/阿维巴坦与临床治愈独立相关(调整后的优势比[aOR],2.63;95%置信区间[CI],1.31 - 5.30),并对AKI有保护作用(aOR,0.08;95%CI,0.03 - 0.22)。住院死亡率无差异。使用头孢他啶/阿维巴坦实现临床治愈所需治疗的患者数为5,使用多粘菌素/氨基糖苷类药物导致AKI的有害患者数为4。

结论

这些数据支持在治疗耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染时,优先使用头孢他啶/阿维巴坦而非多粘菌素或氨基糖苷类药物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验