• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个种族和民族多样化的人群中,垂直袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术后血脂异常的缓解和复发。

Remission and Relapse of Dyslipidemia After Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population.

机构信息

Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, California.

Departments of Health Services and Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33843.

DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33843
PMID:36169953
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9520365/
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The comparative effectiveness of the most common operations in the long-term management of dyslipidemia is not clear.

OBJECTIVE

To compare 4-year outcomes associated with vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) vs Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for remission and relapse of dyslipidemia.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective comparative effectiveness study was conducted from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2016, with follow-up until December 31, 2018. Participants included patients with dyslipidemia at the time of surgery who underwent VSG (4142 patients) or RYGB (2853 patients). Patients were part of a large integrated health care system in Southern California. Analysis was conducted from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021.

EXPOSURES

RYGB and VSG.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Dyslipidemia remission and relapse were assessed in each year of follow-up for as long as 4 years after surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 8265 patients were included, with a mean (SD) age of 46 (11) years; 6591 (79.8%) were women, 3545 (42.9%) were Hispanic, 1468 (17.8%) were non-Hispanic Black, 2985 (36.1%) were non-Hispanic White, 267 (3.2%) were of other non-Hispanic race, and the mean (SD) body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) was 44 (7) at the time of surgery. Dyslipidemia outcomes at 4 years were ascertained for 2168 patients (75.9%) undergoing RYGB and 3999 (73.9%) undergoing VSG. Remission was significantly higher for those who underwent RYGB (824 [38.0%]) compared with VSG (1120 [28.0%]) (difference in the probability of remission, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.19), with no differences in relapse (455 [21.0%] vs 960 [24.0%]). Without accounting for relapse, remission of dyslipidemia after 4 years was 58.9% (1279) for those who underwent RYGB and 51.9% (2079) for those who underwent VSG. Four-year differences between operations were most pronounced for patients 65 years or older (0.39; 95% CI, 0.27-0.51), those with cardiovascular disease (0.43; 95% CI, 0.24-0.62), or non-Hispanic Black patients (0.13; 95% CI, 0.01-0.25) and White patients (0.13; 95% CI, 0.03-0.22).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this large, racially and ethnically diverse cohort of patients who underwent bariatric and metabolic surgery in clinical practices, RYGB was associated with higher rates of dyslipidemia remission after 4 years compared with VSG. However, almost one-quarter of all patients experienced relapse, suggesting that patients should be monitored closely throughout their postoperative course to maximize the benefits of these operations for treatment of dyslipidemia.

摘要

重要性

最常见的血脂异常长期管理操作的相对疗效尚不清楚。

目的

比较垂直袖状胃切除术(VSG)与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)在血脂异常缓解和复发方面的 4 年结果。

设计、地点和参与者:这是一项回顾性比较有效性研究,于 2009 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日进行,随访至 2018 年 12 月 31 日。参与者包括在手术时患有血脂异常的患者,他们接受了 VSG(4142 例)或 RYGB(2853 例)。患者来自南加州一个大型综合性医疗保健系统。分析于 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2021 年 12 月 31 日进行。

暴露

RYGB 和 VSG。

主要结果和测量

在手术后的最长 4 年内,每年评估血脂异常缓解和复发情况。

结果

共纳入 8265 例患者,平均(SD)年龄为 46(11)岁;6591 例(79.8%)为女性,3545 例(42.9%)为西班牙裔,1468 例(17.8%)为非西班牙裔黑人,2985 例(36.1%)为非西班牙裔白人,267 例(3.2%)为其他非西班牙裔种族,手术时平均(SD)体重指数(体重以千克为单位除以身高以米为单位计算)为 44(7)。对 2168 例(75.9%)接受 RYGB 和 3999 例(73.9%)接受 VSG 的患者进行了 4 年的血脂异常结果评估。RYGB 组(824 [38.0%])的缓解率明显高于 VSG 组(1120 [28.0%])(缓解概率差异,0.10;95%CI,0.01-0.19),两组复发率无差异(455 [21.0%] vs 960 [24.0%])。不考虑复发,RYGB 术后 4 年血脂异常缓解率为 65 岁及以上患者(58.9%[1279])和 VSG 术后患者(51.9%[2079])。在 65 岁及以上(0.39;95%CI,0.27-0.51)、心血管疾病(0.43;95%CI,0.24-0.62)或非西班牙裔黑人患者(0.13;95%CI,0.01-0.25)和白人患者(0.13;95%CI,0.03-0.22)中,手术间差异最为显著。

结论和相关性

在这项在临床实践中接受减重和代谢手术的大型、种族和民族多样化的患者队列中,与 VSG 相比,RYGB 术后 4 年血脂异常缓解率更高。然而,近四分之一的患者出现复发,这表明患者应在整个术后过程中密切监测,以最大限度地提高这些手术治疗血脂异常的益处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/701e/9520365/ce333a32d0c4/jamanetwopen-e2233843-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/701e/9520365/f794a1d6421d/jamanetwopen-e2233843-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/701e/9520365/e05b767abadb/jamanetwopen-e2233843-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/701e/9520365/ce333a32d0c4/jamanetwopen-e2233843-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/701e/9520365/f794a1d6421d/jamanetwopen-e2233843-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/701e/9520365/e05b767abadb/jamanetwopen-e2233843-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/701e/9520365/ce333a32d0c4/jamanetwopen-e2233843-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Remission and Relapse of Dyslipidemia After Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass in a Racially and Ethnically Diverse Population.在一个种族和民族多样化的人群中,垂直袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术后血脂异常的缓解和复发。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2233843. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33843.
2
Comparative effectiveness of gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on predicted 10-year risk of cardiovascular disease 5 years after surgery.胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术对术后 5 年预测 10 年内心血管疾病风险的比较效果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Jun;18(6):716-726. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.02.021. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
3
Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy for Weight Loss and Type 2 Diabetes Across Race and Ethnicity in the PCORnet Bariatric Study Cohort.PCORnet 减重研究队列中不同种族和族裔人群中 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术治疗体重和 2 型糖尿病的安全性和有效性比较。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):897-906. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3714.
4
Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy in the Remission of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与垂直袖状胃切除术治疗2型糖尿病缓解情况的系统评价和Meta分析
Pol Przegl Chir. 2024 Jan 15;96(3):69-82. doi: 10.5604/01.3001.0054.2674.
5
Risk of Operative and Nonoperative Interventions Up to 4 Years After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy in a Nationwide US Commercial Insurance Claims Database.在全国性美国商业保险理赔数据库中,Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与垂直袖状胃切除术在术后 4 年内的手术和非手术干预风险。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Dec 2;2(12):e1917603. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17603.
6
Weight recurrence after Sleeve Gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a propensity score matched nationwide analysis.袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后体重复发:全国倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Jun;37(6):4351-4359. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09785-8. Epub 2023 Feb 6.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass for Diabetes Treatment: A Claims-based Cohort Study.基于医保索赔数据的队列研究:比较袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗糖尿病的效果。
Ann Surg. 2021 May 1;273(5):940-948. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003391.
8
Ten-year outcomes after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: an observational nonrandomized cohort study.Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术 10 年后的结果:一项观察性非随机队列研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Mar;15(3):382-388. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.01.020. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
9
Comparison of 4-Year Health Care Expenditures Associated With Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Sleeve Gastrectomy.比较 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术相关的 4 年医疗费用。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Sep 1;4(9):e2122079. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22079.
10
Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities.袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与单吻合口胃旁路术的长期随访:减肥和缓解合并症的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Feb;33(2):401-410. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9. Epub 2018 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Short-term effects of gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on high LDL cholesterol: The BASALTO randomized clinical trial.胃旁路术与胃袖状切除术对高 LDL 胆固醇的短期影响:BASALTO 随机临床试验。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 Jun 15;23(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02296-x.
2
The Impact of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery on Apo B100 Levels in Individuals with high BMI: A Multi-Centric Prospective Cohort Study.代谢与减重手术对高体重指数个体载脂蛋白B100水平的影响:一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jul;34(7):2454-2466. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07258-6. Epub 2024 May 15.
3
Diabetic Markers, Five Years after Bariatric Surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimum Threshold of Bariatric Surgical Weight Loss for Initial Diabetes Remission.减重手术治疗初发糖尿病的最低体重阈值。
Diabetes Care. 2022 Jan 1;45(1):92-99. doi: 10.2337/dc21-0714.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of Gastric Bypass and Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy for Hypertension Remission and Relapse: The ENGAGE CVD Study.胃旁路术与垂直袖状胃切除术治疗高血压缓解和复发的效果比较:ENGAGE CVD 研究。
Hypertension. 2021 Sep;78(4):1116-1125. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.16934. Epub 2021 Aug 9.
3
Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss and Quality of Life at 7 Years in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SLEEVEPASS Randomized Clinical Trial.
减肥手术后五年的糖尿病标志物
Middle East J Dig Dis. 2023 Oct;15(4):270-276. doi: 10.34172/mejdd.2023.357. Epub 2023 Oct 30.
4
Effect of Sarcopenic Obesity on Weight Loss Outcomes and Quality of Life after Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.肌少性肥胖对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术减肥效果及生活质量的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
Obes Surg. 2024 May;34(5):1479-1490. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07146-z. Epub 2024 Mar 15.
5
Cardiometabolic Improvements After Metabolic Surgery and Related Presurgery Factors.代谢手术后的心脏代谢改善及相关术前因素
J Endocr Soc. 2024 Mar 14;8(5):bvae027. doi: 10.1210/jendso/bvae027. eCollection 2024 Mar 12.
6
Comparison of Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Randomized Clinical Trial.袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术比较:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jan 2;7(1):e2353141. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.53141.
7
Post-surgical psychiatric symptoms, maladaptive eating patterns, and lifestyle behaviors associated with weight recurrence after bariatric surgery.减重手术后与体重复发相关的术后精神症状、不良进食模式和生活方式行为。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024 Mar;20(3):297-303. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.09.027. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
8
Suicide attempts after bariatric surgery: comparison to a nonsurgical cohort of individuals with severe obesity.减重手术后的自杀尝试:与严重肥胖的非手术队列个体进行比较。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Dec;19(12):1458-1466. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2023.08.013. Epub 2023 Sep 1.
9
Bariatric surgery in liver cirrhosis.肝硬化患者的减重手术
Front Surg. 2022 Dec 15;9:986297. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.986297. eCollection 2022.
腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗病态肥胖患者 7 年的减肥效果和生活质量比较:SLEEVEPASS 随机临床试验。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Feb 1;156(2):137-146. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5666.
4
Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity Among Adults: United States, 2017-2018.成年人肥胖和重度肥胖的患病率:美国,2017-2018 年。
NCHS Data Brief. 2020 Feb(360):1-8.
5
Effectiveness of Gastric Bypass Versus Gastric Sleeve for Cardiovascular Disease: Protocol and Baseline Results for a Comparative Effectiveness Study.胃旁路手术与胃袖状切除术治疗心血管疾病的有效性:一项比较有效性研究的方案和基线结果
JMIR Res Protoc. 2020 Apr 6;9(4):e14936. doi: 10.2196/14936.
6
Weight Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass Compared to Nonsurgical Treatment.袖状胃切除术和胃旁路术与非手术治疗的体重结局比较。
Ann Surg. 2021 Dec 1;274(6):e1269-e1276. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003826.
7
Comparing the 5-Year Diabetes Outcomes of Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Bypass: The National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORNet) Bariatric Study.胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术治疗糖尿病的 5 年结局比较:全国以患者为中心的临床研究网络(PCORNet)减重研究。
JAMA Surg. 2020 May 1;155(5):e200087. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.0087. Epub 2020 May 20.
8
Interventions and Operations 5 Years After Bariatric Surgery in a Cohort From the US National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network Bariatric Study.干预措施和手术 5 年后在美国国家以患者为中心的临床研究网络肥胖研究队列中的结果。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Mar 1;155(3):194-204. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5470.
9
A Comprehensive Comparison of LRYGB and LSG in Obese Patients Including the Effects on QoL, Comorbidities, Weight Loss, and Complications: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肥胖患者中 LRYGB 和 LSG 的全面比较,包括对生活质量、合并症、体重减轻和并发症的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Obes Surg. 2020 Mar;30(3):819-827. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04306-4.
10
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Weight Loss, Comorbidities, and Biochemical Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜胃旁路术:随机对照试验的减重、合并症和生化结局的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ann Surg. 2021 Jan 1;273(1):66-74. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003671.