McLaren S J, Sahli M W, Selig S, Masten S J, Page W H
College of Health, Massey University, Wellington, New Zealand.
Department of Public Health and Health Sciences, Coolege of Health Sciences, University of Michigan-Flint, Flint, MI, USA.
J Water Health. 2022 Sep;20(9):1314-1328. doi: 10.2166/wh.2022.035.
Between 2014 and 2016, there were two severe community water system (CWS) failures in Flint, Michigan (MI), USA and Havelock North, Hawkes Bay, New Zealand. These events had profound implications for public health in their respective countries. While the nature of both crises was different, certain aspects of the failings were strikingly similar. These included: failure of authorities to protect the integrity of their source water, 'wait-and-see approach' to address problems if and when they occurred, negligent approach to regulatory oversight and responsibility, substandard facilities and lack of knowledge and training of staff, failure of consultants and advisory services engaged by suppliers, and failure of government agencies to enforce regulations. The lessons from both incidents must be learned, or similar tragic events are likely to reoccur. The six principles identified in the Government Inquiry into the Havelock North outbreak are an essential first step. The next step is to implement them throughout the drinking water sector.
2014年至2016年间,美国密歇根州弗林特市以及新西兰霍克湾哈夫洛克北部分别发生了两起严重的社区供水系统(CWS)故障事件。这些事件对各自国家的公众健康产生了深远影响。尽管两场危机的性质不同,但失败的某些方面却惊人地相似。这些方面包括:当局未能保护其水源的完整性;对问题采取“观望”态度,即便问题出现也不及时解决;监管疏忽以及责任缺失;设施不合标准,员工缺乏知识和培训;供应商聘请的顾问和咨询服务失职;政府机构未能执行相关规定。必须吸取这两起事件的教训,否则类似的悲剧事件很可能再次发生。政府对哈夫洛克北疫情爆发的调查中确定的六项原则是至关重要的第一步。下一步是在整个饮用水部门实施这些原则。