Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Interdisciplinary Research on Medicines (CIRM), University of Liège, Liège, Belgium; Department of Medicine, Division of Diabetes, Nutrition and Metabolic Disorders, CHU Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Diabetes Metab. 2022 Nov;48(6):101390. doi: 10.1016/j.diabet.2022.101390. Epub 2022 Sep 25.
Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) is a common cardiac arrhythmia in patients with diabetes and is associated with an increased risk of morbidity, including ischaemic stroke and heart failure, and mortality. Different classes of glucose-lowering agents have shown distinct effects on the risk of stroke and heart failure. Their effects on cardiac arrhythmias such as AF/AFL have not been carefully investigated yet and even less their possible relationship with classical complications such as stroke and heart failure. The present comprehensive review aims at analysing the effects of each pharmacological class on the risk of new-onset AF/AFL episodes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and in patients with heart failure (with or without diabetes). Relevant findings were collected both in post-hoc analyses of placebo-controlled trials and in real-life retrospective observational studies, which both led to the publication of several meta-analyses. Of note, no randomised controlled trials evaluated the effects on AF/AFL as a pre-specified endpoint and none included head-to-head active drug comparisons, so that caution is required in the conclusion. Overall, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors, besides their remarkable effects on heart failure issues, were associated with the most pronounced and consistent reduction in incident AF/AFL, an effect surprisingly not accompanied by a significant reduction in stroke. In contrast, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, which have proven their ability to reduce stroke, apparently failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in new-onset AF/AFL in most reports. A better understanding of both reasons for these discrepancies and underlying mechanisms supporting the drug antiarrhythmic effect requires further careful dedicated studies.
心房颤动/扑动(AF/AFL)是糖尿病患者常见的心律失常,与发病率增加相关,包括缺血性中风和心力衰竭,以及死亡率增加。不同类别的降糖药物对中风和心力衰竭风险的影响也不同。它们对 AF/AFL 等心律失常的影响尚未得到仔细研究,更不用说它们与中风和心力衰竭等经典并发症的可能关系了。本综述旨在分析每种药物类别对 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者和心力衰竭(无论是否合并糖尿病)患者新发 AF/AFL 发作风险的影响。在安慰剂对照试验的事后分析和真实世界的回顾性观察研究中都收集了相关发现,这两者都导致了几项荟萃分析的发表。值得注意的是,没有随机对照试验将 AF/AFL 作为预先指定的终点进行评估,也没有包括头对头的活性药物比较,因此在得出结论时需要谨慎。总体而言,钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂除了对心力衰竭问题有显著影响外,还与新发 AF/AFL 发生率的最大和最一致降低相关,令人惊讶的是,这一效果并没有伴随着中风发生率的显著降低。相比之下,胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂已被证明能降低中风风险,但在大多数报告中,它们显然未能显示出对新发 AF/AFL 的显著降低作用。要更好地理解这些差异的原因和支持药物抗心律失常作用的潜在机制,需要进一步进行仔细的专门研究。