Suppr超能文献

2型糖尿病患者中钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂与胰高血糖素样肽受体激动剂治疗心房颤动的比较:随机对照试验网络荟萃分析的系统评价

Comparison of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide Receptor Agonists for Atrial Fibrillation in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Systematic Review With Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Li Wenjie, Chen Xingqing, Xie Xiangqi, Xu Min, Xu Lingling, Liu Peiying, Luo Bihui

机构信息

Nanshan College, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China; and.

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2022 Mar 1;79(3):281-288. doi: 10.1097/FJC.0000000000001197.

Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a major public health concern with a rising prevalence. Although sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have shown the respective favorable effects on reducing the occurrence of AF/atrial flutter (AFL), comparative protective AF/AFL effects between above 2 novel antidiabetic agents remain unavailable. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the comparative efficacy of SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs in reducing the risk of AF/AFL in patients with type 2 diabetes and estimate relative rankings of interventions. PubMed, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched up to December 1, 2020. All available randomized controlled trials comparing SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs with one another or placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes were included. Pooled results were shown as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used a frequentist network meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of interests. Thirty-six randomized controlled trials including 85,701 participants with type 2 diabetes were identified. Compared with placebo, both SGLT2is (RR: 0.82, 95% CI, 0.68-0.99) and GLP-1RAs (RR: 0.86, 95% CI, 0.76-0.97; RR long-acting ones: 0.87, 95% CI, 0.76-0.99; RR short-acting ones: 0.72, 95% CI, 0.45-1.14) significantly reduced AF/AFL risk. No significant difference between SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs was noted (RR: 0.95, 95% CI, 0.76-1.2). Compared with placebo, results from the analysis showed an RR of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.45-1.14) for short-acting GLP-1RAs and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76-0.99) for long-acting GLP-1RAs in reducing the risk of AF/AFL. Compared with placebo, both SGLT2is and GLP-1RAs possessed favorable effects on reducing the risk of AF/AFL. However, no difference was observed when comparisons were made between them. In addition, long-acting ones may confer a more pronounced AF/AFL reduction benefit compared with placebo.

摘要

心房颤动(AF)是一个日益受到关注的重大公共卫生问题。尽管钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白2抑制剂(SGLT2is)和胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)已分别显示出对降低房颤/心房扑动(AFL)发生率的有利作用,但这两种新型抗糖尿病药物之间相对的预防AF/AFL的效果仍不明确。因此,我们旨在评估SGLT2is和GLP-1RAs在降低2型糖尿病患者AF/AFL风险方面的相对疗效,并估计不同干预措施的相对排名。检索了截至2020年12月1日的PubMed、Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov。纳入了所有在2型糖尿病患者中比较SGLT2is与GLP-1RAs或与安慰剂对照的随机对照试验。汇总结果以风险比(RRs)及95%置信区间(CIs)表示。我们采用频率学派网状Meta分析来评估感兴趣的结局。共纳入36项随机对照试验,涉及85701例2型糖尿病患者。与安慰剂相比,SGLT2is(RR:0.82,95%CI,0.68 - 0.99)和GLP-1RAs(RR:0.86,95%CI,0.76 - 0.97;长效GLP-1RAs的RR:0.87,95%CI,0.76 - 0.99;短效GLP-1RAs的RR:0.72,95%CI,0.45 - 1.14)均显著降低了AF/AFL风险。未观察到SGLT2is与GLP-1RAs之间存在显著差异(RR:0.95,95%CI,0.76 - 1.2)。与安慰剂相比,分析结果显示短效GLP-1RAs降低AF/AFL风险的RR为0.72(95%CI,0.45 - 1.14),长效GLP-1RAs为0.87(95%CI,0.76 - 0.99)。与安慰剂相比,SGLT2is和GLP-1RAs在降低AF/AFL风险方面均具有有利作用。然而,二者之间比较未观察到差异。此外,与安慰剂相比,长效GLP-1RAs可能在降低AF/AFL方面具有更显著的益处。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验