Calo Corinne, Barrington David Allen, Mclaughlin Eric M, Bixel Kristin
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Nov 7;32(11):1370-1376. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-003779.
Patients in rural areas have a higher incidence of cervical cancer with increased rates of metastatic disease than their urban counterparts.
To evaluate whether medical provider density, acting as a surrogate for screening availability, is associated with the incidence of cervical cancer or proportion diagnosed with advanced stage disease.
Cervical cancer cases by county from 2015 were retrieved from the SEER database. The numbers of primary obstetric-gynecologists (OB-GYN), family practice, and internal medicine providers were obtained from the Area Health Resource File, and population estimates for each county were used to calculate provider to resident ratios. Spearman rank correlations were used to compare the number of providers per 100 000 residents with the overall incidence of cervical cancer as well as the proportion diagnosed at an advanced stage. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to assess factors independently associated with advanced stage disease, accounting for county of residence. Mortality was compared across different OB-GYN provider density categories.
A total of 3505 cases of cervical cancer from 405 counties were included. Spearman correlation demonstrated a significant inverse association between the number of OB-GYN providers per 100 000 residents and the incidence of cervical cancer (p<0.0001) as well as the proportion diagnosed at an advanced stage (p=0.003). Compared with those living in counties with ≤5 OB-GYN providers per 100 000 residents, those living in counties with >10 providers had a 29% reduction in the odds of presenting with advanced stage disease (OR=0.71; 95% CI 0.55 to 0.91). An inverse association between cervical cancer-related mortality and OB-GYN provider density was also noted.
A significant inverse correlation between provider density and incidence of cervical cancer, proportion with advanced stage disease, and cervical cancer-related mortality was observed. Increasing provider density in these underserved, high-risk areas may improve timely cancer detection.
农村地区患者的宫颈癌发病率高于城市地区患者,且转移性疾病发生率也更高。
评估作为筛查可及性替代指标的医疗服务提供者密度是否与宫颈癌发病率或晚期疾病诊断比例相关。
从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中检索2015年各县的宫颈癌病例。从区域卫生资源文件中获取初级妇产科医生、家庭医生和内科医生的数量,并使用各县的人口估计数来计算提供者与居民的比例。采用Spearman等级相关性分析比较每10万居民中的提供者数量与宫颈癌总体发病率以及晚期诊断比例。进行多变量逻辑回归分析,以评估与晚期疾病独立相关的因素,并考虑居住县的因素。比较不同妇产科医生提供者密度类别的死亡率。
共纳入来自405个县的3505例宫颈癌病例。Spearman相关性分析表明,每10万居民中妇产科医生的数量与宫颈癌发病率(p<0.0001)以及晚期诊断比例(p=0.003)之间存在显著负相关。与居住在每10万居民中妇产科医生≤5名的县的居民相比,居住在每10万居民中妇产科医生>10名的县的居民晚期疾病发生率降低了29%(比值比[OR]=0.71;95%置信区间[CI]为0.55至0.91)。还注意到宫颈癌相关死亡率与妇产科医生提供者密度之间存在负相关。
观察到提供者密度与宫颈癌发病率、晚期疾病比例以及宫颈癌相关死亡率之间存在显著负相关。在这些服务不足的高风险地区增加提供者密度可能会改善癌症的及时检测。