National Clinical Research Center of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Clinical Research for Cardiovascular Medications, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College Beijing People's Republic of China.
Ascension Health St Louis MO.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2022 Oct 4;11(19):e026300. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.026300. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
Background Although aldosterone antagonists improve outcomes in select individuals with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction, studies in the United States have raised concerns about underuse and overuse. Variations in the prescription of aldosterone antagonist in China are unknown. Methods and Results In the multicenter, hospital-based, retrospective China PEACE (China Patient-Centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events) study, we identified a nationally representative cohort of admissions for heart failure in a nationally representative sample of Chinese hospitals in 2015. Patients were classified into 1 of 3 groups according to their eligibility for spironolactone-"ideal" (left ventricular ejection fraction <40% and without contraindications), "contraindicated" (a documented contraindication, irrespective of left ventricular ejection fraction), and "uncertain-benefit" (all others). We measured hospital variation of spironolactone prescriptions at discharge in the "ideal" and "contraindicated" group and calculated the median odds ratio (MOR), a measure of institution-level variation for 2 individuals with similar characteristics discharged at 2 randomly selected hospitals. Hospital characteristics associated with spironolactone use were identified using multivariable linear regression model. Among 1222 ideal patients from 97 hospitals, the median rate of spironolactone prescription was 78.6% (interquartile range [IQR], 42.8%-89.6% [range, 0%-100%], MOR, 3.4 [95% CI, 2.7-4.0]) at discharge. Among 900 contraindicated patients from 83 hospitals, the median rate of spironolactone prescription was 30.0% (IQR, 9.1%-50.0% [range, 0%-100%], MOR, 3.1 [95% CI, 2.4-3.9]) at discharge. Hospitals with independent departments of cardiology and located in Eastern China were associated with a 38.0% (95% CI, 18.7-57.3; <0.001) and a 14.6% (95% CI, 2.3%-26.9%; =0.020) higher rate of spironolactone use for ideal patients. Conclusions In this national study of hospitals in China, the use of spironolactone among ideal patients and the inappropriate use of spironolactone among patients with contraindications was substantial, with rates that varied markedly by institution. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02877914.
背景 尽管醛固酮拮抗剂可改善部分射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的预后,但美国的研究对其过度使用和使用不足的情况表示担忧。醛固酮拮抗剂在中国的使用情况尚不清楚。
方法和结果 在多中心、以医院为基础的回顾性中国心力衰竭患者评估研究(China PEACE)中,我们在中国的医院中确定了一个具有代表性的心力衰竭入院患者队列,这些医院来自全国代表性的样本。根据螺内酯的适应证(左心室射血分数<40%且无禁忌证的“理想”患者,有明确禁忌证的“禁忌”患者,以及其他所有情况的“不确定获益”患者),患者被分为 3 组。我们测量了“理想”和“禁忌”组出院时螺内酯的处方医院间差异,并计算了 2 名具有相似特征的患者在 2 家随机选择的医院出院时的中位数优势比(MOR),这是衡量机构水平差异的指标。使用多变量线性回归模型确定与螺内酯使用相关的医院特征。在来自 97 家医院的 1222 名“理想”患者中,出院时螺内酯处方的中位数比例为 78.6%(四分位距 [IQR],42.8%-89.6%[范围,0%-100%],MOR,3.4[95%CI,2.7-4.0])。在来自 83 家医院的 900 名“禁忌”患者中,出院时螺内酯处方的中位数比例为 30.0%(IQR,9.1%-50.0%[范围,0%-100%],MOR,3.1[95%CI,2.4-3.9])。有独立心内科的医院和位于华东地区的医院,为“理想”患者使用螺内酯的比例分别高出 38.0%(95%CI,18.7-57.3;<0.001)和 14.6%(95%CI,2.3%-26.9%;=0.020)。
结论 在这项针对中国医院的全国性研究中,螺内酯在“理想”患者中的使用以及在有禁忌证的患者中不恰当地使用螺内酯的情况相当普遍,而且机构之间的差异非常显著。
https://www.clinicaltrials.gov。
NCT02877914。