Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory School for Biological Sciences, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA.
Neuron. 2022 Dec 7;110(23):3970-3985.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2022.09.005. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
Elucidating the neural circuits supporting odor identification remains an open challenge. Here, we analyze the contribution of the two output cell types of the mouse olfactory bulb (mitral and tufted cells) to decode odor identity and concentration and its dependence on top-down feedback from their respective major cortical targets: piriform cortex versus anterior olfactory nucleus. We find that tufted cells substantially outperform mitral cells in decoding both odor identity and intensity. Cortical feedback selectively regulates the activity of its dominant bulb projection cell type and implements different computations. Piriform feedback specifically restructures mitral responses, whereas feedback from the anterior olfactory nucleus preferentially controls the gain of tufted representations without altering their odor tuning. Our results identify distinct functional loops involving the mitral and tufted cells and their cortical targets. We suggest that in addition to the canonical mitral-to-piriform pathway, tufted cells and their target regions are ideally positioned to compute odor identity.
阐明支持气味识别的神经回路仍然是一个开放性挑战。在这里,我们分析了小鼠嗅球的两种输出细胞类型(僧帽细胞和丛状细胞)对解码气味身份和浓度的贡献,以及其对各自主要皮质靶标(梨状皮层与前嗅核)自上而下反馈的依赖性。我们发现,在解码气味身份和强度方面,丛状细胞明显优于僧帽细胞。皮质反馈选择性地调节其主要嗅球投射细胞类型的活动,并实现不同的计算。梨状皮层反馈特异性地重构僧帽细胞的反应,而来自前嗅核的反馈则优先控制丛状细胞的表示增益,而不改变其气味调谐。我们的研究结果确定了涉及僧帽细胞和丛状细胞及其皮质靶标的不同功能环路。我们认为,除了经典的僧帽细胞-梨状皮层通路外,丛状细胞及其靶区还非常适合计算气味身份。