Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.
J Dairy Sci. 2022 Nov;105(11):9084-9097. doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22299. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
The objective of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the relationship between management practices and antimicrobial use in heifer calves on Canadian dairy farms. Questionnaires on calf management practices, herd characteristics, and calf treatment records were administered on 147 dairy farms in 5 provinces during annual farm visits in a multiyear, nationwide research project (Canadian Dairy Network for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Resistance: CaDNetASR). Questions focused on the calf caregiver, calving pen, colostrum management, milk feeding, grouping, bedding management, and age when male calves were sold. Antimicrobial treatment records were collected on each farm from either an electronic herd management system or paper-based records. Newborn heifers born in the last 12 mo were identified retrospectively and followed to 60 d of age, with antimicrobial treatments and dates of sale or death extracted for further analysis. A multivariable linear regression model was developed with the natural log of the number of antimicrobial treatments per calf-year as the dependent variable, and categorized calf management practices and farm characteristics as the independent variables. A complete data set of records on 7,817 calves was retrieved from 74 farms based on completeness of calf records. A total of 2,310 calves were treated at least once with an antimicrobial, and 7,307 individual antimicrobial treatments were recorded. Among the reasons for antimicrobial use, respiratory disease (54%) was most common, followed by diarrhea (20%), presence of a fever (3%), and umbilical disease (2%). Florfenicol (33% of recorded treatments), penicillin (23%), and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (18%) were commonly used, whereas fluoroquinolones (4%), and ceftiofur (1%) were used less commonly. Farms (31%) commonly had 0-1.0 antimicrobial treatments/calf-year (median: 2.2 treatments/calf-year; interquartile range: 0.64-6.43 treatments/calf-year). Defined daily dose (DDD) per calf-year was calculated based on the Canadian bovine standards. Among the 74 farms, florfenicol (1.35 DDD/calf-year) and macrolides (0.73 DDD/calf-year) were used most, whereas ceftiofur (0.008 DDD/calf-year) was the lowest. The final multivariable linear regression model indicated that farms that fed transition milk had fewer than half the number of antimicrobial treatments per calf-year than those who did not feed transition milk. The number of antimicrobial treatments per calf-year in preweaning calves was low on many farms, and there was low use of highly important drugs for human medicine. The effect of feeding transition milk should be investigated regarding potential effects on antimicrobial use and disease prevention.
本横断面研究旨在调查加拿大奶牛场小母牛管理实践与抗菌药物使用之间的关系。在一项多年全国性研究项目(加拿大奶牛网络抗菌药物管理和耐药性:CaDNetASR)中,于每年农场访问期间,在 5 个省的 147 个奶牛场,通过问卷调查小母牛管理实践、畜群特征和小母牛治疗记录。问题集中在小母牛护理人员、产犊栏、初乳管理、牛奶喂养、分组、垫料管理以及雄性小公牛出售的年龄上。从电子畜群管理系统或纸质记录中收集每个农场的抗菌药物治疗记录。通过回顾性方法确定最近 12 个月内出生的新生小母牛,并随访至 60 日龄,提取抗菌药物治疗和出售或死亡日期进行进一步分析。采用多元线性回归模型,以每头小母牛-年抗菌药物治疗次数的自然对数为因变量,以分类小母牛管理实践和农场特征为自变量。根据小母牛记录的完整性,从 74 个农场中检索到了 7817 头小母牛的完整数据集。共有 2310 头小母牛至少接受过一次抗菌药物治疗,共记录了 7307 次个体抗菌药物治疗。在抗菌药物使用的原因中,呼吸道疾病(54%)最为常见,其次是腹泻(20%)、发热(3%)和脐炎(2%)。常用的抗菌药物有氟苯尼考(33%的记录治疗)、青霉素(23%)和磺胺甲恶唑-甲氧苄啶(18%),而氟喹诺酮类(4%)和头孢噻呋(1%)的使用较少。(31%的)农场每头小母牛-年抗菌药物治疗次数为 0-1.0 次(中位数:2.2 次/头小母牛-年;四分位间距:0.64-6.43 次/头小母牛-年)。基于加拿大牛的标准计算了每头小母牛-年的定义日剂量(DDD)。在这 74 个农场中,氟苯尼考(1.35 DDD/头小母牛-年)和大环内酯类(0.73 DDD/头小母牛-年)的使用最多,而头孢噻呋(0.008 DDD/头小母牛-年)的使用最少。最终的多元线性回归模型表明,与不喂过渡奶的农场相比,喂过渡奶的农场每头小母牛-年的抗菌药物治疗次数不到一半。许多农场的小母牛在断奶前的抗菌药物治疗次数都很低,而且对人类医学非常重要的药物使用也很低。应该调查喂过渡奶对抗菌药物使用和疾病预防的潜在影响。