文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

慢性腰痛伴多裂肌功能障碍患者的修复神经刺激疗效的 3 年耐久性。

Three-Year Durability of Restorative Neurostimulation Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction.

机构信息

Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

Neuromodulation. 2023 Jan;26(1):98-108. doi: 10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.457. Epub 2022 Sep 27.


DOI:10.1016/j.neurom.2022.08.457
PMID:36175320
Abstract

BACKGROUND: Restorative neurostimulation is a rehabilitative treatment for patients with refractory chronic low back pain (CLBP) associated with dysfunction of the lumbar multifidus muscle resulting in impaired neuromuscular control. The ReActiv8-B randomized, sham-controlled trial provided evidence of the effectiveness and safety of an implanted, restorative neurostimulator. The two-year analysis previously published in this journal demonstrated accrual of clinical benefits and long-term durability. OBJECTIVE: Evaluation of three-year effectiveness and safety in patients with refractory, disabling CLBP secondary to multifidus muscle dysfunction and no indications for spine surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prospective, observational follow-up of the 204 implanted trial participants. Low back pain visual analog scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EuroQol quality of life survey, and opioid intake were assessed at baseline, six months, and one, two, and three years after activation. The mixed-effects model repeated measures approach was used to provide implicit imputations of missing data for continuous outcomes and multiple imputation for proportion estimates. RESULTS: Data were collected from 133 participants, and 16 patients missed their three-year follow-up because of coronavirus disease restrictions but remain available for future follow-up. A total of 62% of participants had a ≥ 70% VAS reduction, and 67% reported CLBP resolution (VAS ≤ 2.5cm); 63% had a reduction in ODI of ≥ 20 points; 83% had improvements of ≥ 50% in VAS and/or ≥ 20 points in ODI, and 56% had these substantial improvements in both VAS and ODI. A total of 71% (36/51) participants on opioids at baseline had voluntarily discontinued (49%) or reduced (22%) opioid intake. The attenuation of effectiveness in the imputed (N = 204) analyses was relatively small and did not affect the statistical significance and clinical relevance of these results. The safety profile remains favorable, and no lead migrations have been observed to date. CONCLUSION: At three years, 83% of participants experienced clinically substantial improvements in pain, disability, or both. The results confirm the long-term effectiveness, durability, and safety of restorative neurostimulation in patients with disabling CLBP associated with multifidus muscle dysfunction. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The Clinicaltrials.gov registration number for the study is NCT02577354.

摘要

背景: 对于与腰椎多裂肌功能障碍相关的难治性慢性下腰痛(CLBP)患者,恢复性神经刺激是一种康复治疗方法,其导致神经肌肉控制受损。ReActiv8-B 随机、假对照试验提供了植入式恢复性神经刺激器有效性和安全性的证据。本杂志先前发表的两年分析表明,该治疗方法可获得临床益处并具有长期耐用性。

目的:评估植入式恢复性神经刺激器对因多裂肌功能障碍导致难治性、致残性 CLBP 且无脊柱手术指征的患者的三年有效性和安全性。

材料和方法:对 204 名植入试验参与者进行前瞻性、观察性随访。在激活后 6 个月、1 年、2 年和 3 年,使用下腰痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)、Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)、EuroQol 生活质量调查和阿片类药物摄入量评估低背痛。采用混合效应模型重复测量方法,对连续结果进行隐性缺失数据的估算,对比例估计进行多次插补。

结果:共收集了 133 名参与者的数据,16 名患者因冠状病毒病限制错过了三年随访,但仍可进行未来随访。共有 62%的参与者 VAS 降低≥70%,67%报告 CLBP 缓解(VAS≤2.5cm);63%的 ODI 降低≥20 分;83%的 VAS 和/或 ODI 改善≥50%,56%的 VAS 和 ODI 改善均达到显著水平。基线时有 71%(36/51)的阿片类药物使用者自愿停药(49%)或减少(22%)阿片类药物用量。在插补(N=204)分析中,有效性的衰减相对较小,且不影响这些结果的统计学意义和临床相关性。安全性状况仍然良好,迄今为止尚未观察到导线迁移。

结论:三年时,83%的参与者在疼痛、残疾或两者方面都经历了具有临床意义的显著改善。结果证实了恢复性神经刺激在与多裂肌功能障碍相关的致残性 CLBP 患者中的长期有效性、耐用性和安全性。

临床试验注册:该研究的 Clinicaltrials.gov 注册号为 NCT02577354。

相似文献

[1]
Three-Year Durability of Restorative Neurostimulation Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction.

Neuromodulation. 2023-1

[2]
Long-Term Outcomes of Restorative Neurostimulation in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Secondary to Multifidus Dysfunction: Two-Year Results of the ReActiv8-B Pivotal Trial.

Neuromodulation. 2023-1

[3]
Five-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up of Restorative Neurostimulation Shows Durability of Effectiveness in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Associated With Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction.

Neuromodulation. 2024-7

[4]
Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain.

Neuromodulation. 2021-8

[5]
ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol).

Pain Ther. 2023-4

[6]
New Therapy for Refractory Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain-Restorative Neurostimulation to Activate the Lumbar Multifidus: One Year Results of a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Neuromodulation. 2018-1

[7]
Real-World Evidence for Restorative Neurostimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain-a Consecutive Cohort Study.

World Neurosurg. 2022-12

[8]
Multifidus dysfunction and restorative neurostimulation: a scoping review.

Pain Med. 2023-12-1

[9]
Restorative Neurostimulation for Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain: Results from a Prospective Multi-centre Longitudinal Cohort.

Pain Ther. 2021-12

[10]
An implantable restorative-neurostimulator for refractory mechanical chronic low back pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.

Pain. 2021-10-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
The complete relief of chronic pain utilizing electromagnetic theory: A retrospective observational cohort study.

iScience. 2025-6-18

[2]
Review of Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025-5-23

[3]
Multifidus Fat Infiltration in Patients with Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type II Treated with Spinal Cord Stimulation: A Preliminary Report.

J Clin Med. 2025-4-30

[4]
An Evidence-Based Consensus for the Use of Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Non-Surgical Low Back Pain: The NEURON Group.

J Pain Res. 2025-3-14

[5]
Precision Rehabilitation After Neurostimulation Implantation for Multifidus Dysfunction in Nociceptive Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain.

Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024-3-21

[6]
A Systematic Guideline by the ASPN Workgroup on the Evidence, Education, and Treatment Algorithm for Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: SWEET.

J Pain Res. 2024-4-13

[7]
Application of restorative neurostimulation for chronic mechanical low back pain in an older population with 2-year follow up.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025-3-5

[8]
Restorative neurostimulation for chronic mechanical low back pain - Three year results from the United Kingdom post market clinical follow-up registry.

Br J Pain. 2023-10

[9]
Low back pain-related healthcare utilization following intraosseous basivertebral nerve radiofrequency ablation: a pooled analysis from three prospective clinical trials.

Pain Med. 2024-1-4

[10]
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery Statement: Restorative Neurostimulation for Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain Resulting From Neuromuscular Instability.

Int J Spine Surg. 2023-10

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索