文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

用于难治性机械性慢性腰痛的植入式修复神经刺激器:一项随机假手术对照临床试验。

An implantable restorative-neurostimulator for refractory mechanical chronic low back pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.

机构信息

Division of Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.

Hunter Pain Specialists, Newcastle, Australia.

出版信息

Pain. 2021 Oct 1;162(10):2486-2498. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002258.


DOI:10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002258
PMID:34534176
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8442741/
Abstract

Chronic low back pain can be caused by impaired control and degeneration of the multifidus muscles and consequent functional instability of the lumbar spine. Available treatment options have limited effectiveness and prognosis is unfavorable. We conducted an international randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial at 26 multidisciplinary centers to determine safety and efficacy of an implantable, restorative neurostimulator designed to restore multifidus neuromuscular control and facilitate relief of symptoms (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02577354). Two hundred four eligible participants with refractory mechanical (musculoskeletal) chronic LBP and a positive prone instability test indicating impaired multifidus control were implanted and randomized to therapeutic (N = 102) or low-level sham (N = 102) stimulation of the medial branch of the dorsal ramus nerve (multifidus nerve supply) for 30 minutes twice daily. The primary endpoint was the comparison of responder proportions (≥30% relief on the LBP visual analogue scale without analgesics increase) at 120 days. After the primary endpoint assessment, participants in the sham-control group switched to therapeutic stimulation and the combined cohort was assessed through 1 year for long-term outcomes and adverse events. The primary endpoint was inconclusive in terms of treatment superiority (57.1% vs 46.6%; difference: 10.4%; 95% confidence interval, -3.3% to 24.1%, P = 0.138). Prespecified secondary outcomes and analyses were consistent with a modest but clinically meaningful treatment benefit at 120 days. Improvements from baseline, which continued to accrue in all outcome measures after conclusion of the double-blind phase, were clinically important at 1 year. The incidence of serious procedure- or device-related adverse events (3.9%) compared favorably with other neuromodulation therapies for chronic pain.

摘要

慢性下腰痛可由多裂肌功能障碍和退变引起,继而导致腰椎功能不稳定。现有的治疗方法效果有限,预后不佳。我们在 26 个多学科中心进行了一项国际性、随机、双盲、假对照试验,以确定一种可植入、恢复性神经刺激器的安全性和有效性,该刺激器旨在恢复多裂肌神经肌肉控制并缓解症状(clinicaltrials.gov 标识符:NCT02577354)。204 名符合条件的难治性机械性(骨骼肌肉)慢性下腰痛患者和阳性前倾不稳定试验(表明多裂肌功能障碍)患者接受了植入和随机分组,分别接受治疗(N=102)或低水平假刺激(N=102),每日两次,每次 30 分钟,刺激背侧支内侧分支的神经(多裂肌神经供应)。主要终点是比较 120 天时应答者比例(LBP 视觉模拟量表缓解≥30%,不增加镇痛药)。在主要终点评估后,假对照组的参与者切换到治疗性刺激,整个队列在 1 年内评估长期结果和不良事件。在治疗优势方面,主要终点没有定论(57.1%比 46.6%;差异:10.4%;95%置信区间,-3.3%至 24.1%,P=0.138)。预先指定的次要终点和分析结果与 120 天时适度但具有临床意义的治疗益处一致。从基线开始的改善在双盲阶段结束后所有结果测量中仍在继续累积,在 1 年时具有临床意义。严重与程序或设备相关的不良事件发生率(3.9%)与其他慢性疼痛的神经调节治疗相比有利。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/f44ceb490ce0/jop-162-2486-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/1376390d182e/jop-162-2486-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/513b8674816b/jop-162-2486-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/836c078fb9e7/jop-162-2486-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/f44ceb490ce0/jop-162-2486-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/1376390d182e/jop-162-2486-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/513b8674816b/jop-162-2486-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/836c078fb9e7/jop-162-2486-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9a69/8442741/f44ceb490ce0/jop-162-2486-g004.jpg

相似文献

[1]
An implantable restorative-neurostimulator for refractory mechanical chronic low back pain: a randomized sham-controlled clinical trial.

Pain. 2021-10-1

[2]
Long-Term Outcomes of Restorative Neurostimulation in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Secondary to Multifidus Dysfunction: Two-Year Results of the ReActiv8-B Pivotal Trial.

Neuromodulation. 2023-1

[3]
New Therapy for Refractory Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain-Restorative Neurostimulation to Activate the Lumbar Multifidus: One Year Results of a Prospective Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Neuromodulation. 2018-1

[4]
Five-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up of Restorative Neurostimulation Shows Durability of Effectiveness in Patients With Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain Associated With Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction.

Neuromodulation. 2024-7

[5]
Three-Year Durability of Restorative Neurostimulation Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and Multifidus Muscle Dysfunction.

Neuromodulation. 2023-1

[6]
Real-World Evidence for Restorative Neurostimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain-a Consecutive Cohort Study.

World Neurosurg. 2022-12

[7]
Durability of the Therapeutic Effect of Restorative Neurostimulation for Refractory Chronic Low Back Pain.

Neuromodulation. 2021-8

[8]
ReActiv8 Stimulation Therapy vs. Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial for the Treatment of Intractable Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain (RESTORE Trial Protocol).

Pain Ther. 2023-4

[9]
Effect of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment vs Sham Treatment on Activity Limitations in Patients With Nonspecific Subacute and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA Intern Med. 2021-5-1

[10]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Novel multimodal mechanical stimulation is superior to TENS to treat and prevent chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2025-8-18

[2]
A Call for Reckoning and Reform in Interventional Pain Medicine and Neuromodulation Research.

J Pain Res. 2025-7-13

[3]
Review of Guidelines for Implantable Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) in the Management of Chronic Pain.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025-5-23

[4]
An Evidence-Based Consensus for the Use of Neurostimulation for the Treatment of Non-Surgical Low Back Pain: The NEURON Group.

J Pain Res. 2025-3-14

[5]
Musculoskeletal ultrasound-guided needle knife therapy in the treatment of refractory nonspecific low back pain: A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024-12-27

[6]
An Algorithmic Overview of Advanced Pain Therapies: A Narrative Review.

Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2025-1-27

[7]
Restorative Neurostimulation Therapy Compared to Optimal Medical Management: A Randomized Evaluation (RESTORE) for the Treatment of Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain due to Multifidus Dysfunction.

Pain Ther. 2025-2

[8]
ISSLS Prize in Basic Science 2025: Structural changes of muscle spindles in the multifidus muscle after intervertebral disk injury are resolved by targeted activation of the muscle.

Eur Spine J. 2025-1-15

[9]
Precision Rehabilitation After Neurostimulation Implantation for Multifidus Dysfunction in Nociceptive Mechanical Chronic Low Back Pain.

Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. 2024-3-21

[10]
Application of restorative neurostimulation for chronic mechanical low back pain in an older population with 2-year follow up.

Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025-3-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
Research design considerations for randomized controlled trials of spinal cord stimulation for pain: Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials/Institute of Neuromodulation/International Neuromodulation Society recommendations.

Pain. 2021-7-1

[2]
Explantation of 10 kHz Spinal Cord Stimulation Devices: A Retrospective Review of 744 Patients Followed for at Least 12 Months.

Neuromodulation. 2021-4

[3]
John D. Loeser Award Lecture: Size does matter, but it isn't everything: the challenge of modest treatment effects in chronic pain clinical trials.

Pain. 2020-9

[4]
Explantation Rates of High Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation in Two Outpatient Clinics.

Neuromodulation. 2021-4

[5]
Systematic Review of Research Methods and Reporting Quality of Randomized Clinical Trials of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain.

J Pain. 2021-2

[6]
Interpretation of chronic pain clinical trial outcomes: IMMPACT recommended considerations.

Pain. 2020-11

[7]
Appropriate referral and selection of patients with chronic pain for spinal cord stimulation: European consensus recommendations and e-health tool.

Eur J Pain. 2020-7

[8]
Effectiveness of spinal manipulation and myofascial release compared with spinal manipulation alone on health-related outcomes in individuals with non-specific low back pain: randomized controlled trial.

Physiotherapy. 2019-11-18

[9]
Changes in Structure and Function of the Back Muscles in Low Back Pain: Different Time Points, Observations, and Mechanisms.

J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2019-6

[10]
Benefits and harms of spinal manipulative therapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

BMJ. 2019-3-13

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索