• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测智能人机交互中的任务表现。

Predicting task performance for intelligent human-machine interactions.

作者信息

Heard Jamison, Baskaran Prakash, Adams Julie A

机构信息

Adaptive Human-Robot Teaming Lab, Electrical and Microelectornic Engineering Department, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY, United States.

Human-Machine Teaming Lab, Robotics Department, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.

出版信息

Front Neurorobot. 2022 Sep 13;16:973967. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.973967. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fnbot.2022.973967
PMID:36176571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9513063/
Abstract

Human-machine teams are deployed in a diverse range of task environments and paradigms that may have high failure costs (e.g., nuclear power plants). It is critical that the machine team member can interact with the human effectively without reducing task performance. These interactions may be used to manage the human's workload state intelligently, as the overall workload is related to task performance. Intelligent human-machine teaming systems rely on a facet of the human's state to determine how interaction occurs, but typically only consider the human's state at the current time step. Future task performance predictions may be leveraged to determine if adaptations need to occur in order to prevent future performance degradation. An individualized task performance prediction algorithm that relies on a multi-faceted human workload estimate is shown to predict a supervisor's task performance accurately. The analysis varies the prediction time frame (from 0 to 300 s) and compares results to a generalized algorithm.

摘要

人机团队被部署在各种任务环境和范式中,这些环境和范式可能具有高昂的故障成本(例如核电站)。至关重要的是,机器团队成员能够与人类有效互动,同时不降低任务绩效。由于总体工作量与任务绩效相关,这些互动可用于智能管理人类的工作量状态。智能人机协作系统依赖于人类状态的一个方面来确定互动如何发生,但通常只考虑当前时间步长的人类状态。未来的任务绩效预测可用于确定是否需要进行调整,以防止未来绩效下降。一种依赖多方面人类工作量估计的个性化任务绩效预测算法被证明能够准确预测主管的任务绩效。该分析改变了预测时间范围(从0到300秒),并将结果与一种通用算法进行比较。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4821/9513063/f74734034a8c/fnbot-16-973967-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4821/9513063/9f988e5b19ee/fnbot-16-973967-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4821/9513063/dafd333fe133/fnbot-16-973967-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4821/9513063/f74734034a8c/fnbot-16-973967-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4821/9513063/9f988e5b19ee/fnbot-16-973967-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4821/9513063/dafd333fe133/fnbot-16-973967-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4821/9513063/f74734034a8c/fnbot-16-973967-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting task performance for intelligent human-machine interactions.预测智能人机交互中的任务表现。
Front Neurorobot. 2022 Sep 13;16:973967. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2022.973967. eCollection 2022.
2
Optimizing Human-Robot Teaming Performance through Q-Learning-Based Task Load Adjustment and Physiological Data Analysis.通过基于 Q 学习的任务负荷调整和生理数据分析来优化人机协作性能。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Apr 28;24(9):2817. doi: 10.3390/s24092817.
3
Human Performance in Competitive and Collaborative Human-Machine Teams.竞争性与协作性人机团队中的人类表现。
Top Cogn Sci. 2025 Apr;17(2):324-348. doi: 10.1111/tops.12683. Epub 2023 Jul 13.
4
Multi-dimensional task recognition for human-robot teaming: literature review.人机协作中的多维度任务识别:文献综述
Front Robot AI. 2023 Aug 7;10:1123374. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1123374. eCollection 2023.
5
Adaptable (Not Adaptive) Automation: Forefront of Human-Automation Teaming.自适应(非自适应)自动化:人机协作的前沿。
Hum Factors. 2022 Mar;64(2):269-277. doi: 10.1177/00187208211037457. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
6
Exploring the effect of automation failure on the human's trustworthiness in human-agent teamwork.探索自动化故障对人机协作中人类信任度的影响。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Aug 23;10:1143723. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1143723. eCollection 2023.
7
Intelligent Agent Transparency in Human-Agent Teaming for Multi-UxV Management.多无人机/无人车管理中人类-智能体协作的智能体透明度
Hum Factors. 2016 May;58(3):401-15. doi: 10.1177/0018720815621206. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
8
Generalized Behavior Framework for Mobile Robots Teaming With Humans in Harsh Environments.用于移动机器人在恶劣环境中与人类协作的通用行为框架。
Front Robot AI. 2022 Jun 29;9:898366. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.898366. eCollection 2022.
9
Teammates Instead of Tools: The Impacts of Level of Autonomy on Mission Performance and Human-Agent Teaming Dynamics in Multi-Agent Distributed Teams.队友而非工具:自主性水平对多智能体分布式团队任务绩效及人机协作动态的影响
Front Robot AI. 2022 May 20;9:782134. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2022.782134. eCollection 2022.
10
Data-driven modeling and prediction of blood glucose dynamics: Machine learning applications in type 1 diabetes.基于数据驱动的血糖动力学建模与预测:机器学习在 1 型糖尿病中的应用。
Artif Intell Med. 2019 Jul;98:109-134. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2019.07.007. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

本文引用的文献

1
EEG-derived estimators of present and future cognitive performance.基于脑电图的当前和未来认知表现估计器。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2011 Aug 5;5:70. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2011.00070. eCollection 2011.
2
The effects of day-to-day variability of physiological data on operator functional state classification.生理数据日常变化对操作人员功能状态分类的影响。
Neuroimage. 2012 Jan 2;59(1):57-63. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.07.091. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
3
Level of automation effects on performance, situation awareness and workload in a dynamic control task.
动态控制任务中自动化水平对绩效、态势感知和工作负荷的影响。
Ergonomics. 1999 Mar;42(3):462-92. doi: 10.1080/001401399185595.
4
Long short-term memory.长短期记忆
Neural Comput. 1997 Nov 15;9(8):1735-80. doi: 10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735.