Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity, 314505Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Public Health Law Program Host-Site Intern, Applied Research and Translation, Division for Heart Disease and Stroke Prevention, 314505Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Am J Health Promot. 2023 Mar;37(3):300-312. doi: 10.1177/08901171221123311. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
Food service guidelines (FSG) policies can impact the nutritional quality of millions of meals sold or served to government employees, citizens in public places, or institutionalized persons. This study examines state FSG policies adopted January 1, 2015 to April 1, 2019, and uses a FSG Classification Tool (FSG Tool) to quantify alignment with nutrition recommendations for public health impact.
Quantitative Content Analysis.
State Government Worksites and Facilities.
50 states and District of Columbia (D.C.) in the United States.
Frequency of policies and percent alignment to FSG tool.
FSG policies were identified using legal databases to assess state statutes, regulations, and executive orders. Content analysis and coding determined attributes of policies across 4 FSG Tool domains, (1) nutrition standards referenced; (2) behavioral design strategies encouraging selection of healthier offerings; (3) facility efficiency and environmental sustainability; and (4) FSG implementation supports.
From 2015-2019, 5 FSG policies met study inclusion criteria. Four out of 5 policies earned a perfect nutrition score (100%) by referencing nutrition standards that align with the Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) and are operationalized for use in food service venues. Four out of 5 policies included at least 1 implementation supports provision, such as naming an implementing agency, and 2 included provisions that encourage local food sourcing.
From 2015-2019, overall FSG policy comprehensiveness scores ranged from 24% to 73%, with most policies referencing food and nutrition standards that align to national nutrition recommendations. Public health practitioners can educate decision makers on the potential impact of FSG policies on diet-related health outcomes and associated cost savings, as well as other important co-benefits that support locally grown products and environmental sustainability practices.
食品服务指南(FSG)政策可能会影响到向政府雇员、公共场所的公民或机构化人员销售或提供的数百万份餐食的营养质量。本研究审查了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 1 日期间通过的州 FSG 政策,并使用 FSG 分类工具(FSG 工具)来量化与公共卫生影响的营养建议的一致性。
定量内容分析。
州政府工作场所和设施。
美国 50 个州和哥伦比亚特区(D.C.)。
政策的频率和与 FSG 工具的一致性百分比。
使用法律数据库识别 FSG 政策,以评估州法规、条例和行政命令。内容分析和编码确定了 4 个 FSG 工具领域的政策属性,(1)参考的营养标准;(2)鼓励选择更健康产品的行为设计策略;(3)设施效率和环境可持续性;以及(4)FSG 实施支持。
从 2015 年到 2019 年,有 5 项 FSG 政策符合研究纳入标准。5 项政策中有 4 项获得了完美的营养评分(100%),这是通过参考与美国人饮食指南(DGA)一致并针对食品服务场所实施的营养标准实现的。5 项政策中有 4 项至少包含 1 项实施支持条款,如指定执行机构,其中 2 项政策包含鼓励当地采购食品的条款。
从 2015 年到 2019 年,FSG 政策的全面性评分范围从 24%到 73%,大多数政策都参考了与国家营养建议一致的食品和营养标准。公共卫生从业人员可以向决策者宣传 FSG 政策对与饮食相关的健康结果和相关成本节约的潜在影响,以及支持本地种植产品和环境可持续性实践的其他重要共同效益。