Ankermann E
Z Gastroenterol. 1987 Jun;25(6):331-7.
Tort liability in medicine is tort liability in profession whatsoever, besides regarding the special relation between the doctor and his patient as well as the unavoidable risk of failure in medical treatment. Recovery only will be granted in case of iatrogen risks. There are only a few decisions, published or otherwise known to the author, referring to damages caused by endoscopy. Away others they deal with deficient information, such as pain during diagnostic measures, risk of perforation and causing a pancreatitis by ERCP. Furtheron there are stated mistakes in medical treatment because endoscopic explorations though necessary were not done, in two cases because liver-biopsy injured other organs, and in one case because the doctor didn't instruct and supervise his medical assistant who was allowed to stomach-lavage. In the future the question must be answered, whether methods of exploration reducing risks and annoyances should be preferred. There must be information about possible alternative treatment to the patient. If thuch alternative less harmful will not be chosed, this might be regarded as a mistake. Apploying new medico-technical machines and methods will influence the due standard of medical treatment, but there will be economic and ethical limits, which have to be defined both by medicine and law.
医疗侵权责任是任何职业中的侵权责任,不过要考虑医生与患者之间的特殊关系以及医疗失败不可避免的风险。只有在医源性风险的情况下才会给予赔偿。作者所知已公布或其他途径知晓的涉及内镜检查造成损害的判决很少。其他判决涉及信息不足的情况,比如诊断措施中的疼痛、穿孔风险以及内镜逆行胰胆管造影术引发胰腺炎的风险。此外,还有因虽有必要但未进行内镜检查而导致医疗失误的情况,有两例是肝脏活检损伤了其他器官,还有一例是医生未对被允许进行洗胃操作的医疗助手进行指导和监督。未来必须回答这样一个问题,即是否应优先选择降低风险和不适的检查方法。必须向患者提供有关可能替代治疗方法的信息。如果不选择危害较小的替代方法,这可能会被视为失误。应用新的医疗技术设备和方法会影响医疗应有的标准,但会存在经济和伦理限制,这必须由医学和法律共同界定。