Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah; Cancer Control and Population Sciences Program, Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Fertil Steril. 2022 Nov;118(5):960-969. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.07.019. Epub 2022 Sep 29.
To evaluate the associations between 10 well-established ovarian cancer risk factors and risk of ovarian cancer among women with vs. without endometriosis.
Pooled analysis of 9 case-control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium.
Population-based.
PATIENT(S): We included 8,500 women with ovarian cancer, 13,592 control women.
INTERVENTION(S): Ten well-established ovarian cancer risk factors.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Risk of ovarian cancer for women with and without endometriosis.
RESULT(S): Most risk factor-ovarian cancer associations were similar when comparing women with and without endometriosis, and no interactions were statistically significant. However, body mass index (BMI) 25-<30 kg/m was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk among women with endometriosis (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00-1.60), but not associated with the risk among women without endometriosis (OR = 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.05) when compared with BMI 18.5-<25 kg/m; an increased risk was observed for a BMI ≥30 kg/m, although there was little difference comparing women with endometriosis (OR = 1.21; 95% CI, 0.94-1.57) to women without (OR = 1.13; 95% CI, 1.04-1.22) (P-interaction = .51). Genital talcum powder use and long-term menopausal estrogen-only therapy use showed increased ovarian cancer risk, but risk appeared greater for those with endometriosis vs. those without (genital talcum powder: OR = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.04-1.84 vs. OR = 1.12; 95% CI, 1.01-1.25, respectively; ≥10 years of estrogen-only therapy: OR = 1.88; 95% CI, 1.09-3.24 vs. OR = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.14-1.76, respectively); neither of these interactions were statistically significant (P-interaction = .65 and P-interaction = .96, respectively).
CONCLUSION(S): The associations between ovarian cancer and most risk factors were similar among women with and without endometriosis. However, there was some suggestion of differences by endometriosis status for BMI, menopausal hormone therapy use, and genital talcum powder use, highlighting the complexity of ovarian cancer etiology.
评估 10 种已确立的卵巢癌风险因素与子宫内膜异位症患者和无子宫内膜异位症患者的卵巢癌风险之间的关联。
卵巢癌协会联盟中 9 项病例对照研究的汇总分析。
基于人群。
我们纳入了 8500 名卵巢癌患者和 13592 名对照女性。
10 种已确立的卵巢癌风险因素。
有和无子宫内膜异位症的女性的卵巢癌风险。
比较有和无子宫内膜异位症的女性时,大多数风险因素-卵巢癌关联相似,且无统计学意义的交互作用。然而,体质指数(BMI)25-<30kg/m2 与子宫内膜异位症患者的卵巢癌风险增加相关(比值比[OR] = 1.27,95%置信区间[CI] 1.00-1.60),但与无子宫内膜异位症患者的风险无关(OR = 0.97;95%CI,0.91-1.05),与 BMI 18.5-<25kg/m2 相比;BMI≥30kg/m2 时观察到风险增加,尽管子宫内膜异位症患者(OR = 1.21;95%CI,0.94-1.57)与无子宫内膜异位症患者(OR = 1.13;95%CI,1.04-1.22)之间的差异很小(P 交互作用=.51)。外阴滑石粉使用和长期绝经后单独雌激素治疗使用显示出卵巢癌风险增加,但子宫内膜异位症患者的风险似乎更高(外阴滑石粉:OR = 1.38;95%CI,1.04-1.84 vs. OR = 1.12;95%CI,1.01-1.25,分别;≥10 年单独雌激素治疗:OR = 1.88;95%CI,1.09-3.24 vs. OR = 1.42;95%CI,1.14-1.76,分别);这些交互作用均无统计学意义(P 交互作用=.65 和 P 交互作用=.96,分别)。
子宫内膜异位症患者和无子宫内膜异位症患者的卵巢癌与大多数风险因素之间的关联相似。然而,BMI、绝经后激素治疗使用和外阴滑石粉使用的子宫内膜异位症状态存在一些差异,突出了卵巢癌病因的复杂性。