Department of Neurology and Laboratory of Neuroscience, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, P.le Brescia 20, 20149, Milan, Italy.
Neurology Residency Program, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
J Neurol. 2023 Jan;270(1):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s00415-022-11404-4. Epub 2022 Oct 2.
Even if electromyography (EMG) is routinely used to confirm the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), few studies have analysed the correlation between electrophysiological parameters and clinical characteristics of ALS. We assessed if the quantification of active denervation (AD) and chronic denervation (CD) provides clinicians with information about phenotype, disease progression and survival in ALS patients.
We studied a cohort of 689 ALS patients recording the following parameters: age and site of onset, survival, MRC scale for muscle strength evaluation, burden of upper and lower motor signs as measured with specific scales (PUMNS and LMNS, respectively), ALSFRS-R, progression rate (ΔFS), MITOS and King's Staging systems (KSS). We performed EMG on 11 muscles, and calculated semiquantitative AD and CD scores for each limb, as well as for the bulbar and spinal regions.
We found a positive correlation between AD and CD scores with LMNS (respectively p = 4.4 × 10 and p = 2.8 × 10) and a negative correlation with MRC (respectively p = 4.5 × 10 and p = 3.0 × 10). Furthermore, patients with higher spinal AD and CD scores had significantly lower ALSFRS-R scores, and higher KSS and MITOS stages. Conversely, only AD was associated to higher ΔFS (p = 1.0 × 10) and shorter survival (p = 1.1 × 10).
Our results confirmed that EMG examination represents not only a diagnostic instrument, but also a prognostic tool. In this context, AD seems to be a reliable predictor of disease's progression and survival while CD better describes functional disability.
即使肌电图(EMG)通常用于确认肌萎缩侧索硬化症(ALS)的诊断,但很少有研究分析电生理参数与 ALS 临床特征之间的相关性。我们评估了主动失神经(AD)和慢性失神经(CD)的定量是否为 ALS 患者的表型、疾病进展和生存提供了临床医生的信息。
我们研究了 689 名 ALS 患者的队列,记录了以下参数:年龄和发病部位、生存、肌肉力量评估的 MRC 量表、特定量表(分别为 PUMNS 和 LMNS)测量的上下运动征象负担、ALSFRS-R、进展率(ΔFS)、MITOS 和 King 分期系统(KSS)。我们对 11 块肌肉进行了 EMG 检查,并计算了每个肢体以及球部和脊髓区域的半定量 AD 和 CD 评分。
我们发现 AD 和 CD 评分与 LMNS 呈正相关(分别为 p=4.4×10 和 p=2.8×10),与 MRC 呈负相关(分别为 p=4.5×10 和 p=3.0×10)。此外,脊髓 AD 和 CD 评分较高的患者的 ALSFRS-R 评分显著较低,KSS 和 MITOS 分期较高。相反,只有 AD 与较高的 ΔFS(p=1.0×10)和较短的生存时间(p=1.1×10)相关。
我们的结果证实,EMG 检查不仅是一种诊断工具,也是一种预后工具。在这种情况下,AD 似乎是疾病进展和生存的可靠预测指标,而 CD 更好地描述了功能障碍。