Gershuny Victoria, Sun Qin, Schrieber Sarah J, Matta Murali K, Weaver James L, Ji Ping, Sheikhy Morasa, Hsiao Cheng-Hui, Vegesna Giri, Shah Aanchal, Prentice Kristin, Deering Jennifer, Wang Yow-Ming, Strauss David G, Florian Jeffry
Division of Applied Regulatory Science, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Therapeutic Biologics Program, Office of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Jan;113(1):80-89. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2760. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance describes how pharmacodynamic (PD) biomarkers can be used to address residual uncertainty and demonstrate no clinically meaningful differences between a proposed biosimilar and its reference product without relying on clinical efficacy end point(s). Pilot studies and modeling can inform dosing for such PD studies. To that end, we conducted a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, single-dose, parallel-arm clinical study in healthy participants to evaluate approaches to address information gaps, inform best practices for analysis of biomarker samples and study results, and apply emerging technologies in biomarker characterization. Seventy-two healthy participants (n = 8 per arm) received either placebo or 1 of 4 doses of the interleukin-5 inhibitors mepolizumab (3-24 mg) or reslizumab (0.1-0.8 mg/kg). A clinical study using doses lower than approved therapeutic doses was combined with modeling and simulation to evaluate the dose-response relationship of the biomarker eosinophils. There was no dose-response relationship for eosinophil counts due to variability, although the mepolizumab 24 mg and reslizumab 0.8 mg/kg doses showed clear effects. Published indirect-response models were used to explore eosinophil data across doses from this study and the unstudied therapeutic doses. Simulations were used to calculate typical PD metrics, such as baseline-adjusted area under the effect curve and maximum change from baseline. The simulation results demonstrate sensitivity of eosinophils as a PD biomarker and indicate doses lower than the approved doses would have PD responses overlapping with variability in the placebo arm. The simulation results further highlight the utility of model-based approaches in supporting use of PD biomarkers in biosimilar development.
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的指南描述了药效学生物标志物(PD)如何用于解决残留不确定性,并证明在不依赖临床疗效终点的情况下,拟议的生物类似药与其参比产品之间不存在具有临床意义的差异。先导研究和建模可为这类PD研究的给药提供参考。为此,我们在健康受试者中开展了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、单剂量、平行组的临床研究,以评估解决信息缺口的方法,为生物标志物样本分析和研究结果提供最佳实践参考,并在生物标志物特征分析中应用新兴技术。72名健康受试者(每组n = 8)接受了安慰剂或4种剂量的白细胞介素-5抑制剂之一,即美泊利单抗(3 - 24 mg)或瑞利珠单抗(0.1 - 0.8 mg/kg)。一项使用低于批准治疗剂量的临床研究与建模和模拟相结合,以评估生物标志物嗜酸性粒细胞的剂量反应关系。尽管美泊利单抗24 mg和瑞利珠单抗0.8 mg/kg剂量显示出明显效果,但由于变异性,嗜酸性粒细胞计数不存在剂量反应关系。已发表的间接反应模型用于探索本研究各剂量以及未研究的治疗剂量下的嗜酸性粒细胞数据。模拟用于计算典型的PD指标,如效应曲线下基线调整面积和相对于基线的最大变化。模拟结果证明了嗜酸性粒细胞作为PD生物标志物的敏感性,并表明低于批准剂量的剂量会产生与安慰剂组变异性重叠的PD反应。模拟结果进一步突出了基于模型的方法在支持生物类似药开发中使用PD生物标志物方面的效用。