Suppr超能文献

金黄色葡萄球菌药敏试验中与标准的差异。

Variation from standards in Staphylococcus aureus susceptibility testing.

作者信息

Pfaller M A, Wakefield D S, Hammons G T, Massanari R M

出版信息

Am J Clin Pathol. 1987 Aug;88(2):231-5. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/88.2.231.

Abstract

In an effort to assess the degree of methodologic variation and adherence to current guidelines for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), the authors surveyed the susceptibility testing practices of all 162 microbiology laboratories in the Veterans Administration (VA) system. Completed questionnaires were returned by 136 (84%) of the laboratories. Overall, 96 (71%) laboratories used disk diffusion testing, 54 (40%) used manual broth dilution, and 36 (26%) used an automated method. The percentage of MRSA detected ranged from 0 to 52%, with a mean of 10%. In general, fewer than 60% of laboratories followed the current susceptibility testing guidelines for key methodologic variables such as inoculum preparation, duration of incubation, and medium supplementation. Failure to adhere to these guidelines may result in suboptimal detection of MRSA.

摘要

为了评估检测耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的方法学差异程度以及对现行指南的遵循情况,作者对退伍军人事务部(VA)系统中所有162个微生物实验室的药敏试验操作进行了调查。136个(84%)实验室返回了完整的调查问卷。总体而言,96个(71%)实验室使用纸片扩散法检测,54个(40%)使用手工肉汤稀释法,36个(26%)使用自动化方法。检测出的MRSA百分比范围为0至52%,平均为10%。一般来说,不到60%的实验室遵循了关于关键方法学变量(如接种物制备、孵育时间和培养基补充)的现行药敏试验指南。不遵循这些指南可能导致MRSA检测效果不佳。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验