Rich S S, Annegers J F, Hauser W A, Anderson V E
Am J Hum Genet. 1987 Aug;41(2):249-57.
Complex segregation analysis was performed on 467 nuclear families ascertained through febrile-convulsion probands. The probands were identified as having their first febrile convulsion while residents of Rochester, MN, during the years 1935-64. Parents and first- and second-degree relatives of probands were identified through the Olmsted County, MN, record-linkage system. Diagnoses of convulsive activity were made from review of medical records. The genetic models investigated included both single-major-locus and polygenic models, with likelihoods computed jointly on children and parents as well as being conditioned on parental phenotype. Possible heterogeneity was investigated by means of analyses of frequency of febrile convulsions in the proband. Analyses of the entire data set indicated that the single-major-locus models could be rejected. The most parsimonious model for these data was the pure polygenic (or common familial environment) model with a large heritable component (68% +/- 7%). However, when families were partitioned on the basis of frequency of febrile convulsions in the proband, significant heterogeneity was present. Our results indicated that the polygenic model was strongly corroborated in families of probands with a single febrile convulsion. In families of probands with multiple febrile convulsions, evidence was consistent with a single-major-locus model with nearly dominant seizure susceptibility.
对通过热性惊厥先证者确定的467个核心家庭进行了复杂分离分析。先证者被确定为在1935年至1964年期间居住在明尼苏达州罗切斯特市时首次发生热性惊厥。通过明尼苏达州奥尔姆斯特德县的记录链接系统确定了先证者的父母以及一级和二级亲属。通过查阅病历对惊厥活动进行诊断。所研究的遗传模型包括单主基因座模型和多基因模型,在计算似然性时将儿童和父母的数据联合起来,并以上父母的表型为条件。通过分析先证者热性惊厥的频率来研究可能的异质性。对整个数据集的分析表明,单主基因座模型可以被拒绝。这些数据最简约的模型是具有大遗传成分(68%±7%)的纯多基因(或共同家族环境)模型。然而,当根据先证者热性惊厥的频率对家庭进行划分时,存在显著的异质性。我们的结果表明,在仅有一次热性惊厥的先证者家庭中,多基因模型得到了有力证实。在有多次热性惊厥的先证者家庭中,证据与具有近乎显性癫痫易感性的单主基因座模型一致。